When is a brand name irrelevant?

When is a brand name irrelevant?

How many times does it take for our brand to resonate and come to mind when someone is thinking of [fill in the blank]. There’s so much focus on the fill in blank area that we sometimes forget about reducing the number of times it takes our audiences to associate whatever that blank may be with our brands. Perhaps it is due to the belief that naming a brand is like chiseling in stone, it should never change. We get stuck on the legacy and historical value vs present and future value.

Sure, brands gain value over time and having a long history means a brand has embedded meaning in a large percentage of their target audience. But, when those memories are old in meaning and residing in slightly more experienced brains, perhaps a change is needed.

A brand worthy of this discussion is International Business Machines or, as Gen X knows them, IBM or Big Blue.

The memories are old, the meaning is old, the history is epic and the logo is one of my all time favorites by designer Paul Rand. Some brands are just never going to be young again. IBM is a jumble of letters representing Business Machines that are sold Internationally. How irrelevant can a brand like that be in this age?

I know something that can measure and answer that question, Watson. Yes, let’s turn to Watson in order to calculate the declining relevance of the parent brand, IBM. And then, let’s watch as the teenager runs screaming out of the house yelling “I HATE you, all you talk about is the good ol’ days of punch cards and System/360!”

Watson is a surname and while it may hold some historical baggage of men running companies by men, for men, selling to men; those three old, blue, boring letters it’s associated with help us let go of those potential associations. Watson is a name that embodies intelligence in a modern way. It feels more like a brand focused on the future, versus one stuck in the past. Watson is the next generation and yes, it is getting held behind by the legacy of grandpa’s punch card system.

Which brings us to the next, and potentially more important point, relevancy requires context. A relevant brand name fits into an ecosystem inside the organization and is reflected in the patterns in an industry. In a fast moving industry where constant innovation is essential, the idea of legacy can run counter to the brand’s meaning rather than parallel to it. Working on an old computer is not cool, but putting on an old pair of Red Wing Boots can be. A brand name draws meaning from context, both internal and external.

Whether it’s the next breakfast successor to Toaster Strudels, or a new widget invented by Elon Musk for Tesla, young brands must pull relevancy from how the leadership team will interpret its name. Sure, there’s great research that can be done to understand if a name taps into our unconscious, System One brains, but in the end, the decision makers have to like it enough to give it life.

When brands eventually mature, it is worth considering what pieces of the brand really hold value for today and the future, without bias toward the historical pieces. Just put an old brand into current culture conversations, and feel the awkwardness. “I wonder what Apple will come out with next?” “I can’t wait to see what Tesla will do next.” “I wonder what IBM will do next?”

This author proposes IBM change its name to Watson and start building a more relevant future for the organization and brand.

If you’re looking for an honest viewpoint on your portfolio of names, reach out.

Rebeca Arbona

Giver of Names, Builder of Brands | Crafting strategy-powered names and distinctive brands that stand out in the marketplace.

3 年

Love this, Aaron, but I can't agree. I posted about a related topic recently when IBM announced that the spinoff of their IT Services unit would be named Kyndryl, heaven help us! Moving away from what they should or could have named that business instead, I maintain that the name IBM has so much awareness and positive equity that it overcomes the potentially negative associations of having a legacy name in the technology industry. For starters, even those of us old enough to know the acronym stands for "International Business Machines" don't call up those associations very readily when we think of IBM. It's just IBM. And I'm willing to bet very few younger people know where those letters came from. Also, maybe they're a little bit closer to Redwing shoes than Apple is. IBM isn't a consumer business where "what's next" is as important as expertise and reliability, so maybe an established name isn't as much of a liability. Finally, while I totally agree with you that they could use a shot in the arm of innovative energy, I think IBM's better play would be to make that so and talk about it, within the vessel of all the equity and awareness they have. I'd rather have people reconsider what IBM stands for through a different symbol of reinvention than a name change.

回复
Melissa Freeland

Strategic Marketing Leader | Expert in Finding Creative Solutions to Business Challenges | Innovator that Drives Results

3 年

Aaron Keller Loved the read and the thoughts.... One necessary exercise is actually determining what the company formerly known as IBM is now and where they're going. You need a firm grasp on their strategic direction.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Aaron Keller的更多文章

  • Think & Link; Portia Hart

    Think & Link; Portia Hart

    We have, as humans, amazing opportunities to intersect with people doing inspired things in the world. We can choose to…

  • For Creative Meetings, Try Nordic Style Sparring

    For Creative Meetings, Try Nordic Style Sparring

    The brightness of my monitor jolts me awake, reflecting my groggy morning look. It’s 8 a.

    2 条评论
  • Welcome to the season of experiences.

    Welcome to the season of experiences.

    We have long wondered what would eventually cause the decline of Black Friday and all the inconspicuous consumption. It…

    1 条评论
  • Expo West, Observations and Approaches

    Expo West, Observations and Approaches

    This is for the one or two person marketing team carrying the entire load alone, we are here for you and can be your…

    10 条评论
  • Heading West for Expo

    Heading West for Expo

    Our work takes us all over the world, where we can identify opportunities for our clients to further their…

    2 条评论
  • Purpose: Think & Link

    Purpose: Think & Link

    Our purpose remains unwavering, even as our format evolves and the prominence of our guest speakers continues to grow…

    3 条评论
  • Our New Home

    Our New Home

    The spaces you occupy create the views you enjoy and the views inspire the creative work you produce. Capsule has had…

    39 条评论
  • Where we find inspiration.

    Where we find inspiration.

    In a recent conversation with a client the question came up, "where do you find all your inspiration and creativity?"…

  • A Big "If"

    A Big "If"

    Minnesotans have an opportunity of Silicon Valley proportions. But we’re not going to capitalize on it.

    9 条评论
  • Feeding the Startup Addiction

    Feeding the Startup Addiction

    Let’s go way back to the founding of Capsule in the year Prince made famous. We had a pair of investors when we first…

    9 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了