When AI Plays Favorites: Navigating the Grey
Prashant Kushwaha
Making Sense in a Noisy World - Brand Marketing | Digital Marketing | Social Media Management | Startups | Generalist
As technological advancements continue to transform the way we interact with the world, new possibilities emerge for creativity, communication, and innovation.
However, with every new development, there are also risks and challenges to consider. The case of generative AI is no exception.
With any powerful technology, there is always the risk that it will be misused or abused for malicious purposes. A prominent example of misuse would be the case of deep fakes, where generative AI has been used to create convincing fake videos and images that can be used to spread disinformation, defame individuals, or cause harm.
To address these concerns, it is important to implement guidelines and limited censorship that can help prevent the misuse of these new technologies.
With that being said, it is equally important to ensure that these restrictions do not become oppressive or marginalize free expression. This can be a delicate balance to strike, as we must consider the potential benefits and harms in different contexts.
Selective Bias and Intended Censorship in Generative AI
Selective bias occurs when the data sets used to train the AI tool are not diverse enough, which can lead to the AI tool reproducing the same biases and prejudices found in the data.
领英推荐
Intended or purposeful censorship occurs when the creators of the AI tool intentionally exclude certain types of data or limit the scope of the tool to avoid certain types of output, such as offensive or controversial content.
These issues are particularly relevant in generative AI tools, such as text-to-image or language models, which are designed to generate content based on the data they are trained on. If the data is biased or censored, then the output generated by the tool is also likely to be biased or censored. This can have negative consequences for society, such as reinforcing stereotypes or limiting the diversity of ideas and perspectives.
Possible Approach
?