What’s Wrong with this Picture?

What’s Wrong with this Picture?

What’s Wrong with this Picture - Don't Need to Guess

Imagine the results to be under Command & Control to a fixed schedule.

And yes the Program Manager is the RTE with no Architectural Runway background; just the list of Features.

Sprints are 2 week Projects

DevOps is a Team

QA Release is the Gatekeeper

And on... and on.

Konstantin Dvornicenko

LeSS Practitioner, ICP-ACC, ICP-ATF, CSM, OKR enthusiast

5 年

Just curious. What is the reason of change of original SAFe roles and cut off of levels? By this it looks like changed in purpose. Note, I am not going to discuss whether SAFe is good or not. Why these changes? Do you have real implementation like this? Would you like to create precedence for blaming?

回复
Bohdan Fejtek

Managing Consultant, Director at Group Integration Office @UBS

5 年

It’s safe, which explains everything to community.

回复
Simon Gould

Software Delivery Lead at Cigna UK HealthCare Benefits

5 年

The really sad thing is it doesn't have to be that way. Many of the ideas and principles are sound. They fail because the wider context enforces bad practice. I.e. the organisation is unwilling to change how it operates and RTEs are expected to be managers, centralised dev ops teams are spun up as gatekeepers, there is no architectural runway, no real dev ops - e.g. snowflake deployment environments. Like any framework it's the correct application of the principles (not the strict application of the process) that make them work. SAFe isn't bad, it just usually done badly

Phil Cutcliffe

Leads tech teams and product teams | Agile and DevOps Specialist

5 年

Seriously? did you just alter the Scaled Agile framework diagram and replace the agile bits with waterfall terms?

Olufemi S.

Business Coaching & Consulting | Digital Transformation Expert| Gen AI | Gen BI |Information Security | Consulting | Business Agility | Project Management | Data Governance & Management |

5 年

#ProcessHeavy

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Clemente Garcia的更多文章

社区洞察