What's so hard about innovation?

What's so hard about innovation?

The human species has done fairly well due to our creativity and problem solving capabilities. Yet, many established organisations find it challenging to improve their offering and renew their way of doing things. Moreover, and perhaps more alarmingly, on our quest to create a better future, we have created severe social and environmental problems that are now threatening that same future. So what is it that makes it challenging to innovate, and ultimately take on the challenges to create a truly better and sustainable future? What are the barriers to overcome in order to release the full potential for positive change through innovation?

After many years in different types of organisations and roles, I have observed a number of characteristics I believe are central in the understanding of innovation:

1. Innovation is future-oriented and risky. Even incremental innovation on well-defined challenges means improving or developing something new for the future. There is always some uncertainty about how that future will look, to what extent your innovation efforts will succeed. This means you need to deal systematically with uncertainty and risks to succeed consistently with innovation. To what extent is uncertainty embraced and risk taking rewarded in your organisation?

2. Radical innovation requires learning and change. If your ambitions are high, and you aim for radical innovations, you are not likely to have the knowledge, answers and perhaps even behaviours needed to succeed. This gap not only increases the feeling of uncertainty and risks, but also creates confusion and often resistance as a natural consequence. How well are you prepared for and tackling this feeling and behaviour as individual, team and organisation?

3. Innovation requires openness and collaboration. Great innovations are often a result of collaboration and cross-fertilisation across people with different backgrounds, perspectives and talents, and are normally executed through cross-functional teams. At the same time, most organisations are structured and managed to optimise efficiency based on functional specialisation and excellence. How much time are you expected to spend on team and cross-functional activities that could foster and drive great innovations in your organisation? To what extent do you collaborate externally, offering opportunities for new insights, ideas and perhaps even joint innovation opportunities?

4. Innovation needs investments. Innovation can happen by luck or coincidence, but normally requires dedication, patience and willingness to invest time and resources. How well does that fit with short-term growth and profit expectations typically set by management, owners and stock markets, and how well does innovation stack up against more short-term activities such as cost saving and sales initiatives? What is on top of the agenda of your organisation?

5. Innovation needs a meaningful purpose. A desire to earn more money is not a good starting point for innovation, as it does not provide any direction nor meaningful inspiration for creativity. Neither does an existing organisational setup, as it easily makes you more blind than open towards new needs and alternative solutions. On the other hand, if you have your main stakeholders and their needs at the centre of your innovation efforts, and people identify with and are passionate about them, you can create vast amounts of energy, drive and creativity. How purposeful and inspiring are the goals of your organisation and innovation efforts?

To me, these five points represent a baseline understanding of innovation. They also offer some ideas about how to start improving your innovation efforts, with support from better knowledge, understanding and relevant frameworks.

What are your reflections on the barriers for innovation, and how to manage them in order to turn them into opportunities?

David Cerny

Management Consultant | Business Area Co-Lead | Organize Smarter | Powered by Collective Intelligence

1 年

H?kan K?reby - h?r ?r en take p? innovation som vi pratade om. L?t oss forts?tta prata om hur vi kan nyttja portf?ljstyrning f?r att fr?mja innovation!

Christian Fredriksson

Business & People Development

2 年

This is a post that has aged well! Well written Thomas Kirkegaard!

all part of a big process the world is getting faster and going all the process of redesigning the designer, to prepare people in the era of vocational training the knowledge gained momentum and start directing prepare and seek to exploit less is to produce more, earn more live more. all you may need thanks to technology being applied properly, or is not the case of constant innovation but true long-term innovations with higher profitability and quality.

回复

Great article. At its heart, many companies struggle with the question of how to build innovation into daily practice, with emphasis on engaging the consumer into new products or services. Many firms become entrapped in their legacy and 'the innovator's dilemma' but in my opinion companies like Johnson & Johnson and DSM shows that many stalwarts are capable of escaping from this captivity by engaging the market to pave the road to new opportunities. Take a look at https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/P964

Jan Radcliff

Somewhere in the middle of a creative storm

9 年

You have to start teaching innovation in the classrooms. The earlier the better. Open classrooms for creative learners, and let them explore science and math, and other studies in an unrestricted environment. Foster innovation early on.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Thomas Kirkegaard的更多文章

  • Boosting well-being and clarity in nature

    Boosting well-being and clarity in nature

    Have you ever felt more calm, focused, and creative after spending some time in nature? If so, you are not alone. There…

    2 条评论
  • Building breakthrough organisations by upgrading leadership and governance

    Building breakthrough organisations by upgrading leadership and governance

    How might we upgrade leadership and governance to build resilient and high-performing organisations; capable of…

    5 条评论
  • The Great Reboot

    The Great Reboot

    What if our current human systems are not fit for purpose in the face of accelerating sustainability challenges and…

    5 条评论
  • Please welcome the Chief Regeneration Officer

    Please welcome the Chief Regeneration Officer

    Our language shapes our mindsets and vice versa. In the face of accelerating sustainability challenges, many existing…

    2 条评论
  • From Systems Thinking to Systems Feeling and -Healing

    From Systems Thinking to Systems Feeling and -Healing

    What if our most pressing and complex sustainability challenges are rooted in a disconnect from our feelings and lack…

    33 条评论
  • Systemic approaches to sustainable development offering guidance and hope

    Systemic approaches to sustainable development offering guidance and hope

    The recent 26th UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) was a sad reminder that we are making poor progress in our efforts…

    11 条评论
  • Strategies inviting culture for breakfast

    Strategies inviting culture for breakfast

    How can we facilitate more meaningful strategy development that better help organisations enhance their culture and…

    12 条评论
  • Are our organisations lost at sea?

    Are our organisations lost at sea?

    While humanity’s house is on fire, as climate activist Greta Thunberg puts it, many organisations look like ships on…

    8 条评论
  • What future do you want to create?

    What future do you want to create?

    How can you better navigate times of turbulence and create meaningful progress? I believe there are three cornerstones…

    4 条评论
  • How can we be the best version of ourselves?

    How can we be the best version of ourselves?

    I believe that “growing into connected and meaningful being” is the essence of being at our best; as individuals…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了