What’s the “Right” CAC These Days? The One You Can Afford

What’s the “Right” CAC These Days? The One You Can Afford

To get all the best SaaStr content delivered directly to your inbox weekly, subscribe for free?here .

There are two great SaaS companies I’m working with right now.?Both have a sales-driven process, selling to SMBs.?Both have a CAC payback that is very short — around 90 days.?Both have roughly the same number of employees (roughly 50).

One is cash-flow positive.?The other is burning a ton of cash.?A ton.

No alt text provided for this image


How can that be??What are the differences between these 2 seemingly similar SaaS startups selling to SMBs?

  • Churn.?The higher the churn, the lower your CAC needs to be to survive.
  • NRR.?The cash-flow positive one has 130% NRR from SMBs and has several years of existing customers to renew.?Renewals and 130%+ NRR are very cost-effective drivers of cash flow.?It just takes a few years for the power of renewals and a high NRR to really kick in.
  • CLTV Measurement.?Each of these two startups measures CLTV value differently.?Do you include upsells in Year 1??Projected revenue??This can flatter your CAC metrics.
  • Including — or not including — customers also acquired for free, in your CAC measurement.?If you include customers acquired outside of paid spend, the blended CAC goes way down!

Now, let’s take a look at Jamin Bell of Altimeter Capital’s data.?The average public SaaS company has a 25 month CAC payback.?That’s over 2 years!

No alt text provided for this image

Of course, the public SaaS companies have huge installed bases with no new direct CAC to maintain their existing $100m+ ARR bases.?It’s OK if CAC goes up at scale, up to a point, so long as your CLTV is long and your NRR is high.?If you are keeping customers for a decade, it’s OK if your 10,000th customer costs a bit more to acquire.?The 9,999 before are generating a ton of cash at that point.

Still it raises a question — what is a “correct” CAC these days for startups, especially those without unlimited capital???The reality is the answer is a CAC that fits your revenue plan?and?your burn rate budget.?Zoom is an extreme example.?They managed their CAC for paid customers so that their losses were precisely … $0.?Put differently, yes Zoom is and was viral and acquired a ton of customers for free.?But it also spent a ton on marketing, up to a point.?That point was whatever was left so that the company stayed at a 0% operating margin (neither profit, which they couldn’t use at the time, nor losses, which Eric Yuan could afford but didn’t want).?More on that?here.

No alt text provided for this image

I have no magical insights, and we can’t all skate to the puck quite like Zoom did, but working across 30+ growing SaaS companies, here are a few learnings and thoughts:

  • In the end, any marketing program that performs is worth it — if your NRR is 100%+.?Once churn is under control, almost any marketing program that acquires you happy customers is worth it.?Even if the ROI isn’t huge at first, just get better at it.?If you are keeping customers for a decade, and your NRR is high, almost any marketing channel that works is worth it.
  • Marketing just needs a fixed budget at the end of the day to hit its plan.?CAC is a critical metric, but as we see above, it can be gamed quite a bit.?Make sure you and marketing agree on a fixed budget to deliver a set amount of pipeline / leads / revenue.?Like Zoom, they should spend it as best they can.
  • If your burn rate is low, let the CAC grow.?If you aren’t burning much, don’t put so much pressure on CAC.?Close the customers now.
  • If your burn rate is high, your CAC is likely higher than you think.?See the above example.?Don’t trust a raw CAC number.?Dig in to understand what’s really happening if your burn is high.?That’s almost always a sign your effective CAC is higher than you think.
  • There’s nothing magical to a 12-month CAC.?It does have some nice venture math in terms of $$$ invested vs. $$$ out — in theory.?But it doesn’t really tie to a burn rate, or NRR, or much of anything.?The right CAC is one where you spend on any program that performs, up to a point.?And that point is your budget.

No alt text provided for this image


Most importantly, as CEO, you have to dig in more.?How sales, marketing, and digital costs?really?all interact is confusing.?You have to know the budget, know the burn, and know where cash flows.?Or you can end up with a sales team that seems efficient, a marketing team that seems to be efficient … and an overall business that is burning way, way too much cash.

I’ve seen it too many times.

--

The Official SaaStr Podcast : The Best of the Best delivered 2x each week straight to your iPhone!

No alt text provided for this image
Jason Lawson

I help B2B SaaS Revenue Leaders transform their Pipeline and Sales with Partner-Ecosystem led GTM strategies

2 年

Yes! And the higher CAC you can afford, the greater chance you have of winning in your market.

Carl Ferreira

?????? ?????? ???????? ???? ?????? ?????? ???????

2 年

Those 2 year CAC payback periods are from the "growth at all costs" playbook. We will see CAC payback averages plummet I think. Under 12 to 18 months will be the new average in to years but you add some really helpful context. Rarely is 1 metric the whole story. Short CAC payback and low burn you should be scaling your marketing spend as your leaving money on the table

Nikola Leger

Rolling up agencies & tech at breakneck speed, building the first Growth as a Service platform & ramping up a circular economy #better-together

2 年

The most useful part for us is having someone with your breadth of experience, authority and credibility simply establish how CAC often ends up being gamed and what heuristics can help to see through some of the smoke and mirrors. Incentive is behavior and any metric that can be gamed will be. Sometimes consciously, something even unwillingly but it will happen. As sure as water flows through the river bed... That's why it's so key to make sure we measure what matters. And reward behaviors that promote a healthy growth. It takes years and sometimes decades to be able to look at the dashboard holistically and know where the critical path lies and what levers to push or pull when. Such a unique voice in the market. Thanks for all the precious insights and keep em' coming. ?? It always lends a lot of credibility to our positions, assumptions or insights when they match your experience. Thanks for sharing Jason! You rock! ??

Rick Eldee

SaaS Finance | Equity Investor

2 年

The "right" CAC is where your LTV/CAC is optimized to be at least 3x or greater. - LTV = Annualized Customer Value x Implied Customer Lifetime in years - Annualized Customer Value = (New ARR x Gross Margin) / New Logos - Implied Customer Lifetime = 1 / Annualized churn & downsells If LTV/CAC is less than 3x, either: - get more new logos - increase average deal size via pricing or product innovation - improve gross margins - lower churn - if you can't do any of the above, just dial back & spend less on CAC until you get better a ROI from your GTM team

Parsa Saljoughian

VP, Strategic Finance @ WHOOP | ex VC @ IVP, Growth @ Snap

2 年

Just posted this one. More oriented towards consumer but the point on cash efficiency still holds true on enterprise. https://medium.com/parsa-vc/the-importance-of-cac-payback-in-todays-market-environment-db025df33d5b

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jason M. Lemkin的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了