What's the ONE factor that determines your startup's success?
A variant of this post originally was authored by me on YourStory.
After a decade of investing and incubating startups, Bill Gross and his team at Idea Labs did research to figure out the top attributes that determine if an idea will succeed. It is nicely captured in this TED talk. They studied a lot of factors, including: team, market, idea, timing, business model, investors/funding, and more.
And, the numero uno parameter that determines a startup’s success – timing!
Yes, you’ve probably heard, in many a context, its all about the timing – in sports like tennis, cricket; in performing arts like theatre, music, standup comedy; in investing into assets like startups, public markets, real estate and more.
But timing, in startups?
Even if it is true, how is one supposed to “plan” for timing?
I admit it is hard but you can improve the odds. Hint: start with a deep understanding of the customer. At Prime Venture Partners, we have seen hundreds if not thousands of startups over the years. We have noticed that entrepreneurs spend a lot of time on thinking about the idea, product, and even the business. However, they don’t spend enough time thinking about the customer and both their “readiness” to solve this problem and how much it will move their needle in their business or personal lives.
We have been using a simple framework (see image above) to help with this and are hopeful it will help startups as well.
Step 1: Identification
It starts with identification if the customer has a “real” problem. Is it a problem worth solving? Note, at this stage, it does not say anything about how “meaningful” solving this problem is or how important it is for them vis-à-vis other problems they are facing. It just states that this is a real problem.
You may think that this “framework” will not apply to new, breakthrough products for which there is no precedent – e.g. iPods, iPhone, AirBnb rooms, Segway Scooters, Mosaic Browser, Gmail, and more. Of course, who has
If I had asked my customers what they want, they would have said faster horses.
-- Henry Ford
Of course, this is the WRONG question to ask. What you really want to ask customers is about their context, their problems, their business (and even personal) lives. Being an entrepreneur or innovator, you will find proxies for user pain or user demand; alternatively, you may have a 10X technology breakthrough that could trigger an innovation. Lot of technology driven companies ride a wave of technology to come up with breakthrough solutions that are not imaginable by the typical customer.
It behooves the entrepreneur to ensure they are attempting a problem worth solving.
Step 2: Realisation
It is a real problem, perhaps even a meaningful one, but does the customer realise he has a problem. Let me illustrate with an example. Lets say you are working on an “anti-counterfeiting” protection solution for FMCG food products. Do the consumers realise they have a problem with their “branded” noodles or their hot chocolate? While, no customer will say he want a counterfeit or otherwise defective product, how aware is the customer that this is a real problem? Even if he does realise that it’s a problem, how important is this problem for him to solve?
There are a “large” set of problems which fall in this category of “nice to have” problems. In investor-speak, it is often called the “Vitamin” vs the “Pain Killer” problem.
Solving for “Pain” determines the “urgency” and the “impact” of the problem. This is particularly important for an early stage startup. For most startups, you will not have the time, energy, or capital, to solve a problem that is neither urgent nor important to the customer.
Step 3: Discontent
One of the better places to start solving a problem is where a customer has a problem, has realised that it has it and has already attempted to solve it by some means; it could be using an a different product, or a “jugaad” (makeshift) solution, or by making some process improvements or whatever else. This is the missing step.
Let us take an example. Let’s say you are solving for fraud at currency exchanges. The customer is using various physical machines to verify the validity and accuracy of the cash that has been tendered for exchange. For the sake of discussion, lets say it is 99.999 percent accurate. You now need to answer two questions:
1. Is the customer unhappy or unsatisfied in some way with the present solution?
The customer may be dissatisfied on a variety of factors. It may be that the “throughput” of the currency bills verified is not good enough; or, that the number of different currencies is not supported or that, the odd crumpled bill “jams” the process. You get the idea. You need to look for that “chink” in the armor.
2. Do you have a 10X solution? Is your solution 1000 percent better than the current state of the art? Not 20 percent better, nor 30 percent cheaper, but 1000 percent percent better?
It could be 10X+ on accuracy, volume, cost, or whatever dimension. The reason this matters enormously for an early stage startup, is that you want to make rapid, quick inroads into customers’ adopting your solution. You don’t want to be stuck in “me too” solutions or a “feature matrix” comparison or an endless pursuit of free or paid pilots where the customer is doing “research” through you.
Keep refining your customer, problem, and solution together till you have a “compelling” concept.
Opportunity
Once your problem satisfies existence, realisation, and discontent, you have a problem that is both important and timely; and a solution that’s 10X better. That will lead to organic demand. It will lead to referrals.
You have a problem worth solving. I will write a subsequent post on what are some other hurdles you need to jump to evaluate if the “prize” is worth winning – that will include market size, business model viability, team, and other attributes.
Startups are hard to build because both the problem and solution are unknown.
Eric Reis
Identifying and validating an early startup idea is hard; it behooves you to have some wind behind your back.
(Amit is a Managing Partner at Prime Venture Partners, an early stage Venture Capital firm based out of Bangalore, India. Prime VP invests in category creating, early stage companies founded by rock star teams. Prior, Amit has held leadership positions at Makemytrip, Google and IBM. He is also deeply engaged with the early stage startup ecosystem in India and actively volunteers with iSpirt, TiE and NASSCOM. Find his other blogs on LinkedIn and tweets at @amitsomani)
Co-Founder at GreenStitch.io | Visiting Faculty, IIT Delhi | Enabling Sustainable Fashion Ecosystems
2 个月I completely agree. Success often hinges on being early enough to innovate but not too early to be misunderstood.
HDFC life
4 年Your thinking bourn a success how much Time involve you for positive thinking that is success. Like first thinking mind success, second implementation stage further
Engineer | Laboratory Specialist | Researcher ??Industry 4.0 ?? Ciber-Physical Systems ?? Digital Twin
5 年Amit Somani, great article, congrats.
Architect HyBIST. CEO STAG. Co-Founder Pivotrics.
5 年Interesting to note that timing is key. Given the way you have beautifully setup the problem, when it becomes a real pain and if one has a brilliant solution it is THE time. Thank you for a great read @Amit.
Digital/Cloud Solution Architect | Open to Outside IR35 contract roles | AI/ML and Cloud Solution Expert
5 年Amit, I greatly enjoy your articles. They are filled with pragmatic advice and delivered in an amazingly friendly tone ??