What’s next for Asia’s banks?

What’s next for Asia’s banks?

Asia’s banks rose to prominence in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, when Asian policymakers set in motion massive stimulus and low funding costs allowed them to flood the region with cheap loans.

While credit in the US and Europe grew, at best, by 1% on average from 2009 to 2012, the Asia ex-Japan region gobbled up an average 19% more credit per year during that period. China led all markets with 25% average growth.

Our ROE decomposition analysis suggests this debt boom helped banks boost their return on equity (ROE) by 3.3 percentage points over the three-year period. Lower credit costs added another 0.9 percentage points to ROE. But with the money flowing in, cost discipline was thrown to the breeze – non-interest expenses ballooned, cutting 0.4ppt from ROE. The shift toward more capitalized balance sheets chipped another 0.4ppt from ROE.

Consequently, valuations flipped from trading at an average discount of 14% to global peers from 2000 to 2006 to an average premium of 43% from 2009 to 2012. At the peak in 2012, Asian banks accounted for around half of global banking profits – a substantial rise from less than a third in 2006. The region's banking giants became global heavyweights, and they remain at the top echelon of the global banking industry today.

But things started to go south in 2012. By 2010, the region started to show signs of overheating following years of rapid growth of cheap credits. Average inflation for the region more than doubled from 2.9% in 2009 to 5.9% 2011, forcing regional policymakers to tighten monetary policy. This marked the start of a multi-year decline in Asia ex-Japan banking profitability, which peaked in 2011–12. Though the rate hikes were reversed in the subsequent years for most economies, the structural decline in credit growth continues today.

Loan growth slowed and net interest margins plunged, and as economic growth started slowing and commodity prices crashed, asset quality deteriorated. China, Singapore, Indonesia and Thailand recorded nearly 30– 50bps of net non-performing loan (NPL) formation per year from 2014–16, while India's NPL formation swelled by nearly 200bps – a trend that continued until last year. As a result, Asian banks' loan-loss provisions skyrocketed and ROEs fell by 4.8ppt.

No alt text provided for this image

For many, the advent of digital banking was a saving grace. Banks in China, Singapore, Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan led the digital banking charge, helping to reduce the costs of transactions by 40%–60% (our estimates) and boosting revenues through cross-selling opportunities. Nonetheless, the damage wrought forth from the economic backdrop caused valuations to derate by about 30% from 2012–18 to trade nearly at parity with global peers.

Looking into the future, the outlook looks brighter in the near term than in the long term. Although the sector's earnings growth is slowing both structurally and cyclically, it's still attractive relative to the region – we forecast 7%–8% average growth during 2019–20, versus 5%–6% for the broader MSCI Asia ex-Japan (AxJ) Index. Valuations are attractive – the sector's ROE of around 11.5% is above the MSCI AxJ's, yet its price-to-book and price-to-earnings ratios are 20% and 30% lower – and its average dividend yield of around 3.7% is above the MSCI AxJ's 2.8%. And unlike other sectors that are directly exposed to rising trade barriers, the impact on financials should mostly come from second-round effects.

So, over the next 3–6 months, we are constructive on select financial names.

We favor Asia's insurance leaders, which are well positioned to capitalize on the secular growth in the industry; banks in markets less exposed to trade uncertainties, such as India, Indonesia and the Philippines; and attractively valued banks in Singapore.

But while the region's financial industry might be resilient in the near term, its longer-term outlook isn't so rosy. Growth is moderating for most economies in Asia, uncertainties from US-China trade tensions are weighing on business confidence and investment appetite in the region, and inflation – which correlates with nominal interest rates (and therefore bank profits) – is likely to remain anchored at low levels over the medium term.

Meanwhile, the rise of fintech companies adds competitive pressure. China's two major tech firms, for example, have increasingly ventured beyond the low-margin payment business and into margin-accretive segments in consumer lending, insurance and wealth management. Not only do these initiatives provide additional stream of revenues, they help keep customers inside their ecosystems. As such, these trends raise disintermediation risks for incumbent banks.

Against this backdrop, we believe the pace of consolidation in the industry may accelerate over the next decade. Large, adaptable and technologically superior banks will likely be able to safeguard their market share and margins, while the smaller, rigid ones may gradually lose relevance. Thus, in the years ahead, digital bank leaders with sizable IT spending and proven track records in leveraging digital technology should be well positioned to rise above their peers.



Written by Delwin Kurnia Limas, CFA, Analyst

?Please visit ubs.com/cio-disclaimer #shareUBS


Hi?u Nguy?n

Nhan viên at C?ng ty 379

5 年

ky quan trong ky quan?https://athenacomplex.vn/

回复

Thanks for sharing.

In an era of ultra-low interest rates, Asian banks that generate?a significant proportion of their?revenue from non-interest income (i.e. fee income from both the corporate and consumer) are?also worth a?look?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Min Lan Tan的更多文章

  • The ‘she-conomy’ is thriving, but gaps remain. What’s next?

    The ‘she-conomy’ is thriving, but gaps remain. What’s next?

    Below is a commentary I wrote that was published by The Straits Times here. Since the United Nations officially…

  • The art of (the trade) war

    The art of (the trade) war

    Of all the disruption and brinkmanship unleashed by President Trump in the first month of his second term, the most…

    3 条评论
  • Trump 2.0: Policy disruption unleashed

    Trump 2.0: Policy disruption unleashed

    Below is a commentary I wrote that was published by The Straits Times here. In 2020, then US President Donald Trump…

    2 条评论
  • Once bitten, twice shy

    Once bitten, twice shy

    The year of the snake—traditionally associated with wisdom and intuition in the Chinese zodiac—is beginning on a…

    1 条评论
  • Five for '25

    Five for '25

    One year ago, investors entered 2024 with plenty of big questions. Chief among them were who the next president of the…

  • Roaring 20s: The next stage

    Roaring 20s: The next stage

    Since the start of the 2020s, global equity markets are up by 50%, US nominal GDP has increased by 30%, and US…

    3 条评论
  • Mind the retirement gap to secure financial independence

    Mind the retirement gap to secure financial independence

    Below is a commentary I wrote that was published by The Straits Times here. What does it take to retire with…

  • Game changers

    Game changers

    Just months ago, global markets were grappling with an increase in US unemployment, stubborn inflation, and worsening…

    10 条评论
  • The heat is on for energy transition investors

    The heat is on for energy transition investors

    Below is a commentary I wrote that was published by The Straits Times here. One hundred trillion dollars.

    4 条评论
  • Bulls to boars

    Bulls to boars

    It’s been another bullish year so far for global equity markets. But as investors head into the final quarter of 2024…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了