What’s in a Name? How Addressing People Shapes Professional Relationships Globally
Smita Mishra
PMP? RMP? PMI-CP? Certified Project Manager | Enhancing Organizational Efficiency through Best Practices | PMI-ATP Trainer PMP, PMI-CP | Mentor | Coach
“Smita, can I ask a question?” “Ma’am, could you please explain that point again?”
These are just a couple of ways participants address me during my training sessions. Over the years, I’ve noticed a fascinating pattern: participants from countries like Australia or the US often use my first name, while those from India and several Asian countries prefer “Ma’am.”
This got me thinking—does the way we address people really impact work relationships and collaboration?
The Global Name Game
Working across borders means navigating more than just time zones—it’s about understanding cultural nuances.
? First Name Basis: Encourages openness and informal communication (common in the USA, Australia).
? Last Name with Titles: Reflects respect for hierarchy (prevalent in Japan, Germany).
? Sir/Ma’am Usage: Symbolizes politeness and deference (frequent in India, Middle Eastern countries).
But here’s a personal thought: Sometimes addressing someone by their first name, especially a senior professional, can unintentionally hurt their ego or be perceived as disrespectful. It's a reminder that while global trends lean toward informality, cultural and personal preferences matter deeply.
Why Does It Matter?
?? Impacts Communication: Using the preferred form of address invites open dialogue.
?? Builds Trust and Rapport: Cultural sensitivity enhances team harmony.
?? Boosts Productivity: Respectful environments foster better collaboration.
?? Enhances Inclusivity: Making people feel valued creates a sense of belonging.
My Personal Experience:
During one of my global training programs, a participant from Japan hesitated to use my first name despite my encouragement. I adapted, and the participant became more engaged and forthcoming. Sometimes, small adjustments make a world of difference.
This wasn’t my first encounter with cultural nuances in communication. I remember when I was new to the Delhi-NCR region of India, Hindi not being my mother tongue, I naturally spoke in a more formal tone using words like "Aap" and "Ji" to show respect. Once, when I said "Aap lijiye" to a senior colleague, he pointed out that in the local context, it sounded overly formal—something typically used in personal relationships. I felt awkward but took it as a learning opportunity. Over time, I adapted to using names and local conversational styles, which helped me connect better with my colleagues. This experience reinforced the importance of understanding not just how we address people but also the local language and cultural preferences in an organization.
How Can We Navigate This?
?? Observe and Adapt: Notice how others address each other.
?? When in Doubt, Ask: “How would you like me to address you?” is a simple yet powerful question.
?? Lead by Example: State your preference but respect theirs too.
Final Thoughts:
Names carry more than just letters—they hold respect, culture, and relationships. Being mindful of how we address each other isn’t just about etiquette; it’s about empathy and connection.
?? What’s your experience? Have you ever noticed how being addressed differently affected your interactions? Share your thoughts in the comments!
Presales Solution Architect| SIAM Consultant | ITIL Consultant | PMP | Stakeholder Management | Process Excellence
1 周Insightful dear ??