What’s With All the Unicorns?

What’s With All the Unicorns?

The number of tech unicorns — companies valued at over $1 billion — is growing fast.?According to The Economist, there were about a dozen eight years ago, and now it is up to 750 today. These firms are now valued at a combined $2.4 trillion, and funding for these companies has increased exponentially from a year prior. What is going on?

The report claims that a spending spree by VCs that cashed out of startups after IPOs and acquisitions, as well as more competition between investors, are pushing up valuations.?I think that is indeed a factor.?I also think there is an oversupply of capital looking for investment, for while an asset-light digital economy has less need for capital than an asset-heavy industrial economy, we keep managing our enterprises to maximize shareholder returns.?

But set all that aside for the moment.?If we are not living inside a bubble, if the current valuations do not represent irrational exuberance, then what does account for the current herd of unicorns??In a phrase, category power!

A company’s valuation represents its shareholders views of how much in future returns it is expected to generate.?In established categories, this is largely determined by track record, as seen from the impact of quarterly earnings reports.?But in disrupted categories, as the adverts like to say, “Past performance is no indicator of future results.”?Most of these unicorns, after all, have never shown a profit.?So, it is not performance that is being valued—it is power.?

When you double click on sources of enterprise power, you generate a hierarchy, as illustrated on the slide below:

No alt text provided for this image

Unicorns are being valued almost exclusively on category power.?That’s because it is the highest form of power in the stack, the one that has the greatest impact on future returns.?Electric vehicles, last mile delivery, telemedicine, work from home—all are disrupting traditional categories, meaning massive amounts of spending will migrate away from the current set of incumbents and to the emerging set of challengers.?This is rational.

What is not rational is the notion that the majority of these unicorns will actually survive.?In each of these categories, there is going to be a battle for company power that will end with “gorilla takes most,” “number one chimp does good,” and “monkeys are left scrambling.”?How many future gorillas can there be??Well, how many do we have now??I can name maybe up to ten, but I can’t get to twenty.?Ten more gorillas seems like a real stretch, then add ten to twenty chimps, and you still have over 700 monkeys in waiting.?

So, I do see a reckoning coming.?But like every other visionary there ever was, when I closed my eyes and looked into the future and saw what had to happen, I forgot to look at the calendar to find out when!

That’s what I think.?What do you think?

Follow Geoff on LinkedIn | Infinite Staircase Mailing List

__________________________________________________________________________

Geoffrey Moore | Infinite Staircase Site | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube

Bill Lee

Co-Creator and Host, GROW: Profitable Growth | Co-Founder, Revolution for a Customer Revolution | Founder, Center for Customer Engagement | Consultant | Speaker | Author (HBR-31 publications) |

3 年

Geoffrey, could that $2.4T valuation be considered reasonable as the present value of future earnings from the eventual winners of the categories (like the ones you mentioned) whoever they turn out to be?

回复
David Holt

"Good writing is good thinking."

3 年

No-one can see the future. Not even for a second. It's not that we are not often right, but rather that we don't know when we are going to be wrong. Few people have predicted the rise and fall of entire industries that were all taken for granted in their own finite lifetimes. (Much less individual companies.) Some had it right, but had no idea when. Some made the wrong prediction many times and finally it came true in quite a bit of detail. Richard Feynman, Warren Buffett, and many others have said this in various ways.

回复
Matthew Battaglia

AZ Tech Roundtable Host - 20 Yr Broadcaster + Biz Owner / Interviewing Top Leaders on Biz, Tech, Investing & More / Insights for Entrepreneurs, Bus Owners & Execs / Economic Knight + KFNX GM

3 年

It is too early to tell. This could literally be a VC investor bubble raising valuations to partner w a SPAC to get a IPO payout, or Hope a larger tech co acquires the ‘Unicorn’. Obviously some great co’s will come out of this and be huge. There are many tech companies that have gone public last few years that are not even profitable (see Uber). The sex appeal of tech and the fear of missing out has driven up speculation for a century + ( see Railroad bubble)

回复
Rakesh Cheerla

Technologist & Product Manager

3 年

Perhaps view this $2.4T from the lens of re-inventing all these categories/verticals, and not just category expansion. We do see a lot of partnering, but value and profitability will move to the newer firms. The legacy firms that are not destroyed will be much less profitable. Tesla & SpaceX are good examples to emulate in every category.

回复
Charles Moore

Go-To-Market & Strategy Leader

3 年

The on-demand economy has arrived and A.I. / robotics driven solutions are starting to really show their value.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Geoffrey Moore的更多文章

  • Objective Morality

    Objective Morality

    Without a belief in a divine source, how do atheists justify the existence of objective moral values and duties? By…

    19 条评论
  • Question #2: Existence of Consciousness

    Question #2: Existence of Consciousness

    What is the atheist explanation for the existence of consciousness and subjective experiences? By Geoffrey Moore Author…

    15 条评论
  • Life-Cycle Marketing—Where Are We?

    Life-Cycle Marketing—Where Are We?

    By Geoffrey Moore Author – The Infinite Staircase: What the Universe Tells Us About Life, Ethics, and Mortality As the…

    13 条评论
  • 10 Tough Questions Atheists Often Encounter

    10 Tough Questions Atheists Often Encounter

    By Geoffrey Moore Author – The Infinite Staircase: What the Universe Tells Us About Life, Ethics, and Mortality This is…

    37 条评论
  • Disruptive Innovation—The Game is Changing

    Disruptive Innovation—The Game is Changing

    By Geoffrey Moore Author – The Infinite Staircase: What the Universe Tells Us About Life, Ethics, and Mortality We’ve…

    60 条评论
  • How does culture form?

    How does culture form?

    By Geoffrey Moore Author – The Infinite Staircase: What the Universe Tells Us About Life, Ethics, and Mortality We are…

    11 条评论
  • Zone to Win: Organizing within Zones—Some Lessons Learned

    Zone to Win: Organizing within Zones—Some Lessons Learned

    By Geoffrey Moore Author – The Infinite Staircase: What the Universe Tells Us About Life, Ethics, and Mortality Zone to…

    9 条评论
  • Can we choose our emotions, or do they happen to us?

    Can we choose our emotions, or do they happen to us?

    By Geoffrey Moore Author – The Infinite Staircase: What the Universe Tells Us About Life, Ethics, and Mortality This is…

    27 条评论
  • What about “Non-Founder Mode”?

    What about “Non-Founder Mode”?

    By Geoffrey Moore Author – The Infinite Staircase: What the Universe Tells Us About Life, Ethics, and Mortality Last…

    17 条评论
  • How does language shape our thoughts?

    How does language shape our thoughts?

    By Geoffrey Moore Author – The Infinite Staircase: What the Universe Tells Us About Life, Ethics, and Mortality This is…

    20 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了