Whatever, Your Construction Contract is Soo 2007! An Overview of the Substantive Changes in the 2017 AIA-A201
Sweeney Law, P.A. www.sweeneylawpa.com Ph (954) 440-3993

Whatever, Your Construction Contract is Soo 2007! An Overview of the Substantive Changes in the 2017 AIA-A201

For over one hundred years, the American Institute of Architects (AIA) have been publishing construction documents that are used from coast to coast in the United States and are among the most popular and consistently utilized throughout the construction industry. The AIA issues amendments to their construction documents every ten years; the most recent revisions occurred in 2017. The AIA-A201, titled General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, addresses the costs incurred during a project for site management, material handling, and project management. The AIA-A201 is designed to be used with other AIA contract forms, such as a stipulated lump sum or cost plus with a guaranteed maximum price. The 2017 AIA-A201 contains many minor revisions as well as substantive revisions. Below is a brief overview of the substantive revisions implemented.

Insurance and Bond Exhibit. In the prior version of the AIA-A201 all of the insurance and bond requirements were provided for in the general conditions. Now the insurance and bond requirements are provided for in an exhibit, the AIA-A102, as well as in the general conditions, section 11 of the AIA-A201. Accordingly, parties need to be cognizant to carefully review both to ensure that there are no inconsistencies. The advantages of having the insurance and bond requirements as an exhibit allows for greater flexibility in the type of insurance product, the coverage provided, and the party responsible for payment. Additionally, the AIA-A102 can be specifically tailored to meet the insurance and bond requirements for any type of construction project. 

Notices Can Be Sent Via Electronic Transmission. Recognizing that it is the twenty-first century, the AIA-A201 now allows for notices to be sent to parties via electronic transmission provided that a method for electronic transmission is set forth in the contract between the parties. However, any notices of claims are required to be served by certified or registered mail, or by courier providing proof of delivery. This is going to be a potential pitfall for parties that do not carefully review the notice requirements pursuant to the contract, I am confident that there will be some improper notice of claims submitted by parties that fail to recognize that electronic transmission will not be sufficient.

Contractors Can Be Required to Submit Release and Waiver of Liens With Applications For Payment. Contractors can now be required to provide releases and waivers of liens from subcontractors and material suppliers if it is requested by the owner or architect. Many smaller subcontractors and material suppliers often times have enough issues with preparing their own applications for payment. They will now have to have the waivers and releases of liens carefully prepared and reviewed along with the submission of their applications for payment. This requirement can be potentially be very problematic to smaller contractors and material suppliers that do not have a lot of project management experience. 

Minor Changes in the Work. Minor changes in the work are changes that do not change the contract sum or the time for completion of the contract. In the event that the architect orders minor changes in the work that the contractor reasonably believes will change the contract sum or the time for completion, then the contractor must notify the architect. After notifying the architect, the contractor has the right to not proceed or implement the change in the work.

Owner Must Provide Evidence of Financial Arrangements. While the prior 2007 version provided for evidence of the owner’s financial arrangements, the 2017 AIA-A201 has more extensive language regarding the owner’s ability to pay for the labor, materials, and/or services rendered to the project. This is a clear response to the recent recession that devastated the construction and real estate industry. Prior to the commencement of work and upon written request by the contractor, the owner shall provide reasonable evidence that the owner has the ability to pay for its obligations under the contract. After the commencement of work and upon written request by the contractor, the owner must provide evidence of financial arrangements only if one of the following occur: the owner fails to make payments under the contract; the contractor identifies in writing a concern regarding the owner’s ability to make payment when due; or a change in the work performed under the contract materially changes the contract sum. If the owner fails to provide the reasonable evidence of its ability to pay for the work then the contractor can refuse to proceed forward with the work or even suspend work. Any financial documentation provided by the owner under these circumstances is to remain confidential, absent a subpoena, court order, or the like. This provision is geared towards protecting the contractor and not the owner. Owner’s may potentially lose some of their bargaining power or negotiating arguments when they are forced to disclose financial information. Additionally, I am very curios to see in practice what will be considered as reasonable evidence of the ability to pay, there are likely going to be creative arguments about what constitutes reasonable evidence. Moreover, if the owner doesn’t have the money to pay for all of the work under the project, then they are going to be potentially forced to get creative with their reasonable evidence.

Termination for Convenience Compensation. Termination for Convenience allows the owner to terminate the contractor without cause. In the prior general conditions, the payment to the contractor that is terminated for convenience was for reimbursement for reasonable overhead and profit for work not executed. In the new general conditions, the owner is responsible to pay the contractor for the costs attributable to termination of the subcontracts, and the termination fee, if specified for.

Sweeney Law, P.A. Regularly Handles Construction Contract Preparation & Negotiation

Brendan A. Sweeney, Esq., of Sweeney Law, P.A., has drafted, negotiated, and litigated millions of dollars of construction contracts for all different sectors of the construction industry. From public entities, general contractors, subcontractors, to residential homeowners. Brendan A. Sweeney, Esq., is an AV Preeminent Martindale Rated Attorney, that has been recognized as a Florida Legal Elite Rising Star Attorney in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. If you have any Florida construction law questions and/or issues then contact Sweeney Law, P.A. at (954) 440-3993 immediately to protect your rights. www.sweeneylawpa.com.


Joe Samnik

Consulting Forensic Arborist with 58 Years' Experience | Named as expert witness in over 1,000 litigated cases | Litigation support | Wrongful death and personal injury valuations

6 年

The very same holds true for Landscape specificity Brendan. New and revised Standards are now in the marketplace. Many, if not all developers and owners representatives discover this the hard way. And I speak of 7 figure numbers. The attorneys representing owners need to be aware of these Standards before contracts are awarded. And our educated brethren in the landscape architectural community are not necessarily aware of or up to date on these Standards. Thanks so much for the post Brendan.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了