What would be the future of Bangladesh?
Shahinul Khalisdar
Tax Advisor | Business Advisor/ Taxation Expertise/ Enrolled Agent (EA)/Master of Science in Taxation (MST)/ Author
It is common sense that when people have deep identity crises, they cannot have clear objectives. In my personal experience with Bengalis, Bangladeshi Bengali intellectual level is limited to Mujib and Zia and some cases, Maulana Bhashani and Rabindranath Tagore, making millions of lies and fabricated stories about them.
Their mythical enemy is Pakistan, who raped 200,000 Bengalis and killed 3 million Bengalis, but they have no evidence to provide except disrespecting others, whereas they were officially Hindu Raja and Zamindars Proza from 1793 to the East Pakistan Estate Acquisition Act 1950. Muslim League liberated them from Proza now Muslims are their prime enemy. To my understanding, it seems that being Proza was better for them than being Muslim.
After the Muslim League enacted the East Pakistan Estate Acquisition Act of 1950, property rights were granted to Proza. Prior to 1947, Bengal was ruled by over 15 thousand Hindu Rajas and Zamindars. After 1947, it was administered by the East Wing of Pakistan as an East Bengal Provincial Administrative Government. There was no formal governmental system in place; it was organized into Parganas. The East Bengal Provincial Government became the East Pakistan Government in 1955, and later, the East Pakistan Government transitioned to the Bangladesh Government in 1972 through a provincial governmental order.
From 1969-75, the country went through serious challenges. The economy collapsed, and people were dying of starvation, gang war, land grabbing, lawlessness, gang rape, and social unrest; of course, these types of social environments were good for a few people. All slum thugs like the lifestyle of slum. The lips service lover of Mujib, fraud, criminals and corrupt bureaucrats was highly beneficial by renaming East Pakistan to Bangladesh but not the general public.
Muslim countries, including leaders such as King Faisal, Sheikh Zayed, and Sheikh Sabah, provided aid to help the starving Bengalis instead of merely feeding the people. They erected “Sriti Shoudho “and thousands of Bengali memorials throughout Bangladesh, including in every school and college, and viciously propagated anti-Muslim propaganda.
President Ayub Khan sent East Pakistan to the UK through the voucher program and student exchange program between 1962 and 70; with one voucher, ten people went to the UK, and one student, exchange three students, went to the UK. Now, they are proud of Bengali and claim they sent billions of dollars for Bengali independence.
Shah Azizur Rahman negotiated a Kafil System with UAE, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia to send people outside of the country to earn foreign reserve; Bengali said their Bongobondhu gave them passports outside of the country. Pakistani did not want them to have a passport.
The USA brought some Bangladeshi by lottery program the OP 1, DV1,2, 3 Bengali say Pakistani did a conspiracy to stop Bangladeshi to the USA. ?
领英推荐
The primary sources of Bangladesh’s income are remittance and garments; if you know all the facts, what do you predict? All corrupt bureaucrats, criminals and street gangs will loot the country.
Bangladeshi Bengalis always compare with the USA and Europe. Common sense, the U.S. is the third-largest country, though its landmass is not contiguous. With a small population during the 19th century, the USA welcomed Europeans who had the knowledge to migrate to the country. They worked 12-18 hours a day. Additionally, the USA had slaves working, and the country also used to professionally maintain ethics that allowed people to trust the USA. Whereas Bengalis were Proza, with no financial resources, a large population, and a small country, how can we compare Bangladesh with the USA?
During the 17th century, most European countries were colonizing the world and accumulating wealth through business monopolies and colonization while also focusing on knowledge and innovation. Meanwhile, Bengalis were consuming Panta Bhat and were not allowed to gain knowledge. How can we compare the development of Bangladesh with that of Europe?
Bangladeshi Bengali have deep identity crises. According to the main Islamic central teaching, “Monotheism,” you cannot consider any Bengalis as Muslim. They are direction contradiction to “Monotheistic Belief” and culturally worse. ?
Let me give you an example: I went to an Arlington, VA masjid to perform I?tikāf first thing I heard was a guy saying this guy will pay and laughing. As a performer of I?tikāf, not a single Bengali showed a very basic Islamic etiquette. They did not even serve me the food they did not even understand how to respect a Musafir. Some Arabian countries do not allow I?tikāf due to its responsibility of taking care of a Musafir, not because they dislike I?tikāf; almost all Masjid in Middle Eastern countries, the government takes care of the burden, not the public. When a nation does not have a basic understanding of courtesy, etiquette, and manners, What hope do you have?
They only know pathological lies and loot the country.
In 1971, who was the hardcore fighter for Bengali nationalism? Why is Mujib considered the father of Bengali nationalism instead of Siraj Sikder, the leader of the Purbo Banglar Communist Party? Is communism synonymous with Bengali nationalism? I am completely confused.