What works in Teaching: Discovery Learning or Explicit Instruction?

What works in Teaching: Discovery Learning or Explicit Instruction?

I am learning how to juggle three balls for the first time. I was trying to relate the concepts of working memory and cognitive load theory with a concrete example and learning how to juggle three balls made a perfect sense to me.

And, I also wanted to experiment on myself. First, I would try to learn juggling by watching a few juggling experts on youtube. Then try to figure it out myself on how it’s done. In other words, I wanted to take the The Ekalavya way of learning archery. I made sure not to click any tutorial videos with “Learn how to…” or “Juggling for beginners…” Tempting thoughts though.

Week 1:

Some of the videos I watched are:

Video 1: Juggling 3 Ball Trifecta

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2nSZKeczHk

Video 2: KRIS KREMO (MALABARISTA)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtGNxp4mvoM

Video 3: World Juggling Day Festival 2016 in Japan?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRSq-qZQLF4

So, after almost a week of watching the experts and trying to emulate them — without any guidance or instruction — I couldn’t still figure it out. Except for a few flukes here and there.

I could not grasp the idea or technique on how to throw the three balls up in the air and catch them in a perfect sync. I slowed down the videos so that I could exactly see the way they would throw the first ball.. and the second ball.

Nope. Not helpful at all.

I felt like I have “fossilized” and crossed far beyond the point of learning any new skills. May be if I was younger, I could learn it easily. May be if I had different set of balls. May be.

Week 2:

After a week of failure, feeling overwhelmed and feeling dumb, it was now time for me to watch the tutorial videos.

And, right out of the bat, I realized that: no one starts with the three balls. How could I make such a mistake!

So here are the tutorial videos I watched (and rewatched and rewatched):

Video 1: By Josh Horton, a gold medalist in the world championships of juggling.


Oh bummer. The first step is the Body Position — and not about the balls.

Josh breaks down the complex skill of juggling into the fundamentals and I started practicing the ‘rudiments’.

Video 2:

“Dropping is a part of it. A big part of it.” — Tayler Glenn

Wait… what !!!

The more I watched these tutorials, the more I could visualize internally the minute/concrete mechanism of how to throw and catch the balls.

I even started practicing for 5 mins, just before I went to sleep… expecting that I would also practice this in my dreams. (Laughable, I know.)

And, now my practice routine was something like this (along with a timer)

Step 1: Warm up with a single ball, without dropping it [ 2 mins]

Step 2: Now with two balls, starting with the right hand.

Throw. Throw. Catch. Catch [2 mins]

Step 3: Switch, starting with the left hand.

Throw. Throw. Catch. Catch. [2 mins]

Step 4: Now right to left. Left to right. [2 mins]

I did this for 3 days, with just two balls. I resisted trying this with all the three balls. And it did pay me well.

Step 5: Next step is to master The Flash: Two balls on the right hand. One ball on the left. Start with the right. Throw. Throw. Catch. Catch. End up with left hand having two balls. [2 mins]

This is where I struggled a lot. To the level of frustration.

Step 6: The Cascade Flash. Now it was about stacking up the counts while not losing the patience at all.

Okay, this is me practicing and improving just a little every day.

— — —

So, that was my little experiment on trying to learn juggling through ‘discovery’ process vs through the tutorials — the ‘explicit instruction’ way. My best timing so far is 15 secs. Yeah just 15 secs but this is a massive gain when compared to what I could do (or couldn’t do) in the first week.

In many ways, I could experience the cognitive load going crazy on my working memory during the first week. But after practicing the rudiments, and taking it one step at a time, I was able to unburden my working memory — and surprisingly, I started to enjoy the whole thing. Even though I am yet to reach the state of flow, I am sure that with more practice each day, I will be able to juggle three balls for more than a minute.

Now let me tie everything to the theory.

Which one is better? Discovery learning or Explicit Instruction?

The?research?clearly points: the nature of instruction depends on the level of the learner (novice or expert)

Explicit Instruction is way too helpful when the learner is a novice, and has no prior-knowledge/experience. And, as the learner moves up, gains more knowledge, increases the competence, discovery learning is more appropriate.

What does this mean for the teachers?

Without trying to nerd out on Cognitive Science and Human Cognitive Architecture, here’s my conclusion:

When the students have no or little prior knowledge, start with Explicit Instruction. And, when they have gained enough background knowledge, scaffold & move ahead with “Guided” Discovery Learning.

The Ekalavya Way, even though it looks so flashy/trendy these days among teachers, school leaders, and parents, does not really work with the beginner level students. So be aware. Discovery looks fun but fun doesn’t always mean learning.

Disclaimer:

# I was only giving 20 to 30 mins each day. If I had given more time, the result could be a different. Better. Or, worse even.

Eman Riyadh Al-Qaisi

Assistant Professor(PhD)in English CMMA, linguistics at university of Diyala and PhD.in English Philology from Jaén university/Spain.

4 年

Thank you for sharing!

Biliz Maharjan

Writer | Co-founder at Creato Ink | Founder of NepBloggers

4 年

A very interesting experiment, Umes dai. This has made me think about how I learn stuff. Turns out I'm the "explicit instruction" learner. I'm going to try discovery learning aba. And, mix them as well. Thanks for this insightful post. P.S. aba malai pani juggling garna manlagyo hai..haha

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Umes Shrestha的更多文章

  • Collaborative Learning or Shared Ignorance?

    Collaborative Learning or Shared Ignorance?

    First, I want to confess that “group work” and “group discussion” are huge parts of my teaching. Without them, I would…

  • Is teaching an ART or a SCIENCE?

    Is teaching an ART or a SCIENCE?

    Teaching is a SCIENCE. Teaching has scientific elements in so far as how it works and how learning happens.

    1 条评论
  • Teaching as Communication

    Teaching as Communication

    Most teaching is Communication It goes without saying that a teacher “must” be a good communicator. From being a…

    1 条评论
  • Three Illusions of Learning - Part 3

    Three Illusions of Learning - Part 3

    3. Illusion of Competence Just because someone thinks he/she knows it, doesn’t mean he/she understands it, and also…

  • Three Illusions of Learning - Part 2

    Three Illusions of Learning - Part 2

    2. Illusion of Understanding I’m sure you have seen a bicycle.

  • Three Illusions of Learning - Part 1

    Three Illusions of Learning - Part 1

    This is a three-part series in which I will share with you three most common yet lethal illusions of learning that both…

  • 10 Instructional Principles Teachers Can Learn From Karate

    10 Instructional Principles Teachers Can Learn From Karate

    A few days ago, I had an interesting opportunity to observe a karate training session at a dojo in Tokha, Kathmandu. It…

    7 条评论
  • "Feel Good" Teaching

    "Feel Good" Teaching

    I remember, once while I was studying in Grade 7, our teacher came to the class. He confessed, “Today, I have not…

  • Comments and Reflections

    Comments and Reflections

    That I've received on my latest podcast episode A few weeks back, I had a pleasure to sit down with Sushant Pradhan…

  • Quick Access vs Learning

    Quick Access vs Learning

    Whenever educators claim that, "We can just google information whenever we want. Therefore, we don't need to teach…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了