What will we learn, when we no longer need to?
Have a look at this video:
It’s a deep learning AI that takes all the hard work out of creating art from simple sketches. Scribble something, and the computer does the rest. As the authors suggest, this has applications ranging from architecture to game creation. Could we create movies this way? Probably (based on some I have seen recently).
Now even a six-year old can be an architect. Wait, what?
Stand back and consider the next logical step: why sketch at all? Why not simply say ‘Alexa, I want a big building – more windows – spiral stairs. More glass. I want it to fit between those two buildings.’ Alexa takes care of all the details. How much would you pay someone who can do that? Are you getting the picture?
This is not science-fiction. We already accomplished it with taxi-driving; we’re doing it with food (‘Alexa, get me a pizza’). But what does it all mean? Where is it leading?
Human history can be seen as an extension of homeostasis – the mechanism that drives organisms to seek better conditions. Learning was big leap forwards – not only could organisms remember the bad places, it even allowed us to build better places. Homes, nests, hives. Eventually it enabled us to create systems that removed the need to learn at all – for example, automatically translating other languages.
You can already buy skills. Have a look at the screenshot below. Note that in this interface 'Your Skills' does not mean 'The skills you have' but 'The AI skills you are renting'. Of course, it's early days.
In our future world, AI means that almost any job can be done by anyone – meaning businesses don’t have to pay people nearly so much – dramatically reducing their resourcing costs. Some businesses have already started using pigeons in place of people (turns out pigeons are actually pretty smart). All you need to do is pair them up with AI.*
If (as I have argued elsewhere) learning is driven by our cares – what will we learn in a world where all of our cares are instantly taken care of?
In answering these kinds of questions, humans are optimists; they like to imagine that (other) people will always want to learn. So let me ask you a simple question: what ancient skills that are no longer needed are you currently learning?
*This is science fiction ;o)
A mind model | brain signal signatures | classifiers | BCI
5 年I think the "intelligence" of AI is very tiny compared to a human. In fact I would argue a computer, or sequence of computer code, does not display intelligence or understand anything. Programs are run, output produced true. But it then takes a human to come along and interpret its output. Only then is meaning created. Meaning is in the minds of human beings. A human creates the meaning of a machine process or output. Computers do not understand anymore than a lawnmower understands how to cut grass, or knows it is good at it.
Equipping leaders and businesses to navigate our increasingly complex world.
5 年Everything
I help managers to enable their people to perform better in their roles
5 年worth bearing in mind that most of the Victorian polymaths who discovered and invented so much were usually people of 'independent means'....they did it for kicks!
?? Neurodiversity Without the Nonsense | Helping Businesses Move Beyond Awareness to Real, Measurable Change | Speaker | Coach | Trainer - DM or click below ??
5 年Could we ever get to a position, as we become ever more symbiotic with tech, where we simply download our learning needs? "I know Kung Fu" - Neo (The Matrix) ??
CLO at 360Learning / Host of The Learning & Development Podcast
5 年As somebody who likes doing new things but hates being a novice, I’m excited by this. It means I could ‘do’ loads more new stuff!