What Venture Capital has to Offer in the new Health Care System

What Venture Capital has to Offer in the new Health Care System

Healthcare is too expensive in the U.S. because of a lack of consumer shopping for best price and a lack of transparency that is needed for shopping.

Regardless of whether you’re a fan of Obamacare or Trump/Ryancare or something else, you’re probably upset about who is paying for what and who has access to what healthcare options at what price. Those arguments will be worked out over time, but they are all missing the main point:

Way before Obamacare came along, we set ourselves up for failure by creating a system where consumers make some of the most costly consumer choices of their lives accounting for 18% of GDP without any care about what the price tag is. Even if someone did care, it is next to impossible to find out the cost of a procedure before you have it because of a lack of transparency in medical care costs. 

It’s basic economics that consumers make choices to consume goods and services at the greatest value to them. Value may be entirely price oriented, and it may include other issues such as quality, convenience, prestige, etc. In the U.S. HealthCare system consumers don’t know the price of healthcare, and they don’t directly pay the costs, so they don’t care. If you have a market where the consumers don’t care about the prices, then the natural shift for the demand curve will be to the right. Consumers will continue to buy even when prices get higher and higher.

NONE OF THE PROPOSALS FOR THE NEW HEALTHCARE PLAN TAKE CONSUMER CHOICE INTO ACCOUNT.

Venture Capitalists who have been in the life science and healthcare investment sphere for the past few years have seen incredible innovations in this space. These innovations bring new levels of consumer choice to healthcare consumption and have designed behavioral models that reward healthcare consumers for shopping for the best price. 

Here are just a few examples of innovative companies that can help change the face of healthcare in the U.S.

Spoke Health, for example, offers consumers an option to use whatever provider they choose, but rewards them for using lower cost providers. Consumers who choose the Spoke Health provider pay no co-pay and may even receive a cash rebate for having the procedure done at the preferred provider vs. more expensive alternatives. The system further rewards the payers by pre-purchasing surgical procedures at low cash prices. Spoke Health insures transparent pricing and rewards consumers for making economical choices in a market where price has been shown to have no relation to quality.

Test Appropriate cuts billions from health care spending by using a digital healthcare technology solution to limit the amount of needless tests performed by hospitals and doctors.

Orderly Health is another company that provides transparency to consumers and informs them about their coverage, authorized procedures and the lowest cost providers, which results in lower co-pays for consumers and drastically reduced costs for payers.

Blast Resolve is a telemedicine company that is helping to reduce massive costs to stroke patients by making diagnosis of strokes possible in the field or in an ambulance, reducing time to care in the critical moments when blood is not flowing to the brain. Delayed treatment for stroke costs U.S. patients over $70 Billion

CirrusMD gives consumers fast, high quality care through a text, voice and video telemedicine system. Providers can diagnose and treat many healthcare issues remotely, thus keeping patients out of the emergency room which is the most expensive point of care. For just a few dollars per patient per month, CirrusMD saves healthcare systems millions every year. Just like we’ve all become used to buying products online at Amazon and others, we’ll soon come to think of telemedicine solutions as the preferred medium for our healthcare interactions.

There are hundreds of other companies who are solving problems in healthcare and reducing costs. Congress would do well to learn from them and build some of the following solutions into the new healthcare bill:

1)     Require complete transparency for all medical procedures from providers who accept insurance.

2)     Create economic incentives to consumers to choose lower cost providers.

3)     Incentivize the use of telemedicine to speed up time to treatment and reduce costs.

There are dozens of other recommendations that could come from healthcare startups. Overall, a great strategy for congress would be to increase funding for startups that can show dramatic healthcare cost reductions.

Ballard Pritchett

Accelerate business innovation and prevent data breaches by protecting your company data with i4 Ops-Zero Exfil, the new standard.

7 年

It is an old idea that "free markets" and "competition" are the answer to all economic riddles. The first problem with this idea is that the only really "free" markets are like the street bazaars you would have found in Damascus over the past few thousand years, and open outcry auctions. Virtually all modern markets are "managed" and "regulated" because other models externalize costs and damages onto the larger economic environment, and do not require the parties to the market transactions to recognize the complexities that surround their conduct of "business." Do you want to buy a ticket from an airline with no regulatory obligations? Can you wrap your head around an auctioneer calling out, "I have $10,000 for this superbly transplantable kidney. Do I hear $11,000? $11,000? Do I hear $11,000?" Let's be honest here. Most prescriptions of market economics just do not fit the realities of the health care arena very well, regardless of how much one might be a "believer" in this version of Capitalism. The conditions necessary under market economics theory for a free market (Willing buyer and seller, equal information, equal power, buyer using own money to purchase from seller, multiple bids and offers available, no external interveners, et al.) do not exist often - and never when you seek medical help for your child with a newly-broken limb. The power dynamics in health care are not ever equal, and in most circumstances you have little or no time to shop. The primary strength of "free" markets is to resolve prices for commodities when everyone faces similar choices. They are not a universal economic panacea. So why do people keep advocating "free market solutions" for healthcare? Maybe ask "What is in it for the Free Market Healthcare advocate, besides just an old love affair with an old idea?" Healthcare economics is difficult. As Professor Trump discovered, "Who knew that healthcare was so complicated?" The current system is a mess because it is assembled out of a set of old ideas that do not work well on their own, and work worse when cobbled together as they are. For my money, the intrinsic complexity of healthcare decisions and resource allocation is made worse by third party insurance, and further compounded in difficulty if employers are in the health insurance purchaser role. I now live in a place (New Zealand) where the healthcare system delivers equal or better quality service with less stress and less social tension at half the cost. Doctors from around the world are eager to come work here. Citizens are grateful for their hospitals and access choices (public and private). What's not to like?

回复
Keith Smith

Medical Director at Surgery Center of Oklahoma

7 年

Imploring legislators to "require price transparency" from providers sounds great but will sow the seeds of confusion as legislators will undoubtedly auction exemptions to the biggest health systems opposed to showing their prices upfront. More devastatingly, this type of mandate will afford those who pay for a seat at the table to actually re-define "price transparency" to better fit their desires to remain price opaque. Inviting Uncle Sam, the architect of everything wrong with this industry, to the free market revolution is illogical and counterproductive, in my opinion. Market pressure, like that resulting from large self-funded health plans paying 100 % of the medical bills of their employees/beneficiaries who patronize price-transparent physicians/facilities, makes more sense and avoids government predictably screwing things up. The largest self-funded plans in the country are those of the state governments, so if they want to help in this movement, they should encourage their employees (by paying their medical bills at 100%, as is happening here in Oklahoma) to seek out non-price-gougers.

Rocky Pruitt

Entrepreneur and Investor

7 年

Keith Smith Josh Umbehr, MD you may find this interesting.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Peter Adams的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了