What tech taught me about advertising
"I want you to find a bold and innovative way to do everything exactly the same way it's been done for 25 years."

What tech taught me about advertising

We all know that a change in marketing and advertising is needed.

But how?

After a few years on the client-side (in the tech world and helping apparel brands to transform to digital/tech-first), my approach to leading advertising and the ad business is now entirely different.

To be clear: while my creativity and strategy have evolved - and it's the core to who I am - it's my business approach that I've changed dramatically.

From a business pov, let's talk about what industries have fared better than most during this heartbreaking and tough period. Tech. (Nike and a few other powerful and robust brands have also done well). Need proof, read Scott Galloway's recent No Mercy/No Malice email. I love Scott's pull-no-punches style of thinking and writing. https://www.profgalloway.com/bats-and-amazon

But how does FAANG (Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google - stolen from Scott), continue to rise? What are the lessons I learned? How do I lead now?

Focus on inputs. Report on results

I have participated in agency leadership meetings for over a decade. The usual agenda: i. Finances. ii. New business iii. News and updates. iv. E-Sat, C-Sat, etc. iv. Staff loses/hires vs. other random topics (creative, media, strategy).

From my experience, financials (revenue, sales numbers) are a result and are reported upon, but are not a business driver. In the apparel world, product design, manufacturing, distribution/sales appointments, seasonal trends, and showings (inc. online/offline store traffic) drive the business. In advertising, especially creative shops (whatever the medium), creative is the leading business driver - you can't bill for the work until the work is delivered. So we need to measure inputs (drivers) to the work. Don't get wrong, you need to know the COGS, etc., and financial reporting is a way of ensuring margins and profits.

Think about it from an athlete's point of view. If you wanted to sprint 100m under 10 seconds. You don't measure your finish time. You break the 100m into sections. 1) Pre-race heart rate and warm-up. 2) Response time out of the starting blocks. 3) Time to full velocity 4) Optimal stride length. 5) Time to vertical running. You get the idea.

(And advice to new creative leaders, make friendy with the CFO.)

Short term versus long term

Advertising has backed itself it a corner where the long-term doesn't matter. Amazon sacrifices the short-term over the long-term and has built-in mechanisms for long-term success.

Have you ever wondered how Amazon invents and creates at a phenomenal pace? At the heart of the company is a process called "working backward." It is sublimely simple. The innovation owner writes their idea into a narrative form (quick brief) that highlights the problem/solution, the value proposition, and customer scenarios via faux testimonials. The document takes the shape of a future-based (12-18 months), one-page Press Release, with a series of FAQs following (a total 6-page PRFAQ). The builds a mechanism of how the product/idea will be launched and forces the team to deliver a clear narrative of the objective, describe it without ambiguity, and align everyone. This WSJ blog says it best. https://blog.usejournal.com/why-amazon-continues-to-redefine-landscapes-at-an-unmatched-pace-the-prfaq-2cf0d03bef1c

Roadmaps, Business Plans and Goals

As mentioned, technology companies are great at building mechanisms. And for all my years in the ad business, I've never seen a roadmap as I saw in tech. Every team builds a yearly roadmap (business plan) in narrative form, as well as outline input goals, and a P&L (based on inputs). The rigor is staggering, and an exacting level of importance and structure is placed on these plans and the monthly reporting on goals (green, yellow, red). It's a living document. Roadmaps and Business Plans in advertising tend to be lacking in substance from my experience, and are revenue-based. (See above for goal setting and leadership agendas.) 

Organizational structure - built for fast fails

Sadly, advertising is not good at failure. While we talk about giving people room to fail, we seldom do. Tech companies are built for fast fails. Amazon talks about the difference between "two-way doors" and "one-way doors." Committing resources to an invention (an idea) into some new space can be tricky and an opportunity to fail. It's similar to going through a doorway and uncovering that you don't like what's on the other side. With two-way doors, you can quickly retreat, and you have learnings (failings) you can takeaway. 

Organizational structures are incredibly flat in tech. Advertising, on the other hand, is traditionally hierarchical by nature. Flat organizations in the creative business have several key benefits.

  • Employees have an elevated level of responsibility in the organization (they are making big business decisions for their clients after all).
  • The excess layers of management are removed, therefore improving the coordination and speed of communication.
  • And fewer levels of management allows faster and easier decision-making process - importantly, a flat organization will enable ideas to rise to the surface and be approved quickly.
Which org structure do you think let's good ideas rise to the surface?

I remember years and years ago, I was working inside a large agency, and we thought we had a cracker idea. So we showed our CD, who showed their Group Creative Director, who showed their Executive Creative Director, who showed their Global Chief Creative Officer. And along the way, through rounds, versions, and presentations, the idea lost its meaning, timing, and energy. The reason start-ups and independent agencies can be so creative is that they don't have the layers.  https://www.forbes.com/sites/innovatorsdna/2017/08/08/how-does-amazon-stay-at-day-one/#d71755c7e4da

An agile approach to creating and tweaking

Advertising systems, finances, media, and creative (outside of CRM and dynamic creative), is generally built around a legacy approach. And a linear/waterfall system: you make something, walk away and move on to the next shiny object. Yet, my Mac software is version 10.15.4, Catalina (an improvement upon improvement upon improvement). We need to find new ways to engage customers. And even media needs a refresh: while 2020 may be different, the Up Front and New Front media negotiations are constructed under the same premise.

The End

Advertising and marketing are not dead. We just need to alter. Ideas are still ideas. But we need to look outside of our realm to see how others succeeded. Even look at the rise of consulting firms. They are serviced based like advertising - why have they risen?

Matthew Gingrich

Senior Director - Strategic Accounts at Getty Images / Agency Strategy

4 年

Such an interesting and relevant take that seems to be continually affirmed as time marches on (see: https://www.adweek.com/agencies/how-the-lessons-of-quarantine-will-reshape-advertisings-creative-process/). As an outsider who has served agencies nearly their whole life it's been a curiosity that the agency and brands have been at pseudo odds with one needing sales and the other measuring engagement. COVID, the Facebook boycott and more will be an unfortunate experiment of what value ad spending actually had for many. We've known an ad industry evolution was coming (and necessary) but how fast and who will play - or won't - and wins will be very interesting.

回复
Supriya Sharma

Product Marketing @ EssilorLuxottica | Product Positioning & Messaging | Storyteller | Medical Devices | MedTech

4 年

Thoroughly enjoyed reading this article. Thank you for sharing anthony reeves! What a wonderful insight into your journey and learning.

回复
Mike Haile

Founder @Haile Solutions & AgencySoft | Chartered Accountant | Project Management Professional helping professional services businesses maximize their bottom line

4 年

I read your article before I looked at your profile because a lot of the things that you describe remind me of my experiences in agencies. The obsession with revenue The quarterly reviews The endless dissection of variances vs estimates and so on You raised some excellent points. Thanks for sharing

Matt Williams

Chief Cookie Officer, OpenFortune ??

4 年

anthony reeves very much enjoyed this, and invaluable insight/links to Amazon’s way of thinking. Thanks!

回复
Alistair Ross

Creative Partner | Co-Founder at LogicLogicMagic? | mMBA Marketing

4 年

I grew up in the world of sport where training squad hierarchy is based on weekly performance. Olympians, while given respect, still had to walk the walk. Flat structures and transparency are critical to team success. 22 years in ad agencies watching the pseudo-competitive people dynamics always made me laugh in comparison.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Anthony Reeves的更多文章

  • TikTok: not all song and dance.

    TikTok: not all song and dance.

    Isn't Tiktok where people dance? TikTok has shaken off the perception that it is a social dance app and is an…

    3 条评论
  • People First. Strategy Second.

    People First. Strategy Second.

    Tommy Rivs is the epitome of an ultra runner. Simple, baggage-free, and humble.

  • Advertising: What business are we in?

    Advertising: What business are we in?

    What gives Adweek the right to call Ryan Reynolds a 2020 Brand Visionary. Sure, the guy is a talented actor and an…

    13 条评论
  • Amazon: Friend and Foe

    Amazon: Friend and Foe

    If you’re looking for something scratch your head over, take a look at Amazon’s recent leap into fashion. On the one…

    2 条评论
  • Small is the new big?

    Small is the new big?

    The fetid internal state of many companies begs the question: do brands want to change? And is now the time for them to…

    3 条评论
  • Isolation, Creativity & EQ.

    Isolation, Creativity & EQ.

    Are we having a flat spot in creativity right now? It is easy to see how advances in technology have redefined the way…

    4 条评论
  • D&I: 47% will have slight or some effect.

    D&I: 47% will have slight or some effect.

    If there's one industry that should be able to garner faith and belief, it's advertising. That's what we do for brands.

    14 条评论
  • Post-COVID-19: what's in store for brands, media, and creative?

    Post-COVID-19: what's in store for brands, media, and creative?

    Slipping on my Amazon hat, the above question is wrong. The question should be: Post-COVID-19: what's in store for…

    12 条评论
  • Post-COVID-19: Nothing will change

    Post-COVID-19: Nothing will change

    If you think that Americans will change their behavior post the COVID-19 lockdown, you've got another think coming. [I…

    9 条评论
  • Diversity: a white male problem.

    Diversity: a white male problem.

    What do white men have to do with diversity? Unfortunately, everything. In the Fall of 2013, I stood on Mission Street…

    22 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了