What Talent leaders get wrong about their own job search process…and what to do instead
Growth by Design Talent
Designing and delivering recruiting solutions for high growth companies.
Over the last several weeks, I’ve heard from a number of people who are less than six months into working at a new company and think they may have made the wrong decision. Surprisingly, the majority of these were Talent/Recruiting leaders. This seems counterintuitive—you would think we would be better at evaluating new opportunities as subject matter experts in all things hiring! Let’s talk about why this happens, and what you can do about it.
Why is this happening?
There are several factors that I think are behind this heightened issue for Recruiting leaders:?
What can you do about it??
Although they’ve probably helped thousands of candidates through their own career moves, many Recruiting leaders I speak to are not thinking about their next role in an objective and structured way, but rather making reactive and emotional decisions without first taking the time to map out what they value in their next role.?
The main piece of advice I give them is: Before taking conversations or calls about a next role, step back and build an objective framework. This is not a new concept; as talent leaders we do it all the time with hiring managers and the executive team, but when it comes to ourselves, we often fail to apply it.?
Give your search the same rigor that you would if you were running a structured leadership search for a hiring manager.
Structure will also help mitigate bias (which, as relationship builders, we are particularly prone to) and optimize for what actually matters most to you. Taking the time to reflect and write it down is invaluable—and put it somewhere you can reference it again when it’s decision time.
Before you begin interviewing—rely on a framework
I like to use a simple 2X2 chart. The two columns are the tangible role/company aspects and the intangible culture/environment characteristics. The two rows are a stack ranked list of must haves (non-negotiables) and nice to haves (bonuses), with no more than 5 non-negotiables in each column.
When it comes to the company and role, the tangible aspects are the things about the role and place you work that you can pretty easily compare to other opportunities, sometimes even in a quantifiable way. These might include:
When it comes to culture and environment, the intangible aspects are things that are often more feeling based, or aspirational. These might include:
While you’re interviewing—ask consistent questions
The answers that fill in your 2x2 will help you determine what information you need to gather before, during, and after any conversations with your next company, whether it’s an exploratory chat, a formal interview, or a reference check on the company.
Similar to a recruiting process, having a standard set of questions that you ask will help you get a better signal. The goal is to compare your new opportunities to this framework rather than to one another or against your current role.?
Brendan Browne also recently wrote a great post about this growing trend and shared some important questions Talent leaders should be asking when interviewing.?
You can be sure that they are doing references on you, so be sure to do the same. Talk to others who have worked for or with the founder(s) and Head of People.
Once you get an offer—don't forget to negotiate
By using this framework, you’re more likely to get an offer that you’re not only excited about, but that’s a good fit for you on a deeper level. But once you have the offer in hand, a related phenomenon we often see is Recruiting leaders who don’t properly negotiate their own offers.?
Partially this stems from the fact that when Recruiting leaders do make a position change, it may be to a very different opportunity; they might be changing level or going to a dramatically different stage of company, so it can feel like comparing apples to oranges. The second driving factor is that leaders don’t ever want to be the candidate someone dreads working with — the impossible negotiator. Unfortunately, this sometimes means they avoid the conversation completely. And last, while Recruiting leaders have their finger on the pulse of the roles they hire for, they often don’t have a good sense of the market for their own peers.?
We closely monitor market trends on recruiting leadership compensation and if you’d be interested in participating and receiving the aggregated data, take this brief survey and we will share with you current compensation benchmarks.
To find the right role, be a great hiring manager…for yourself
With so many opportunities out there, and the high personal and professional costs of switching companies, it’s well worth the time to hold yourself to the same standard you would for any hiring manager you’d work with.
This framework will give you the ability to concisely communicate what you’re looking for in a next role, the confidence to say yes or no to an initial conversation, and the tools to optimize the very little discretionary time you have to spend on a role change. While this is broadly applicable to anyone, Talent leaders are especially equipped to do the upfront work and diligence in the process. With a little prep work and reflection, you can find the right role to grow in, for the next chapter, whether that’s two years, or ten!
Adam Ward is a Founding Partner at Growth by Design Talent - a talent advisory firm that provides foundation consulting, training, and retained search focused on Recruiting leaders for high growth companies. If you’d like to learn more or are considering a new leadership role, reach out to us: [email protected]. If you would like to receive future recruiting industry insights, you can subscribe to our monthly newsletter here.?
Recruiting exceptional talent for AKQA ?? Let's connect!! ??
3 年Great read, and I love the grid exercise for alignment! ??