What is Systems Engineering?

What is Systems Engineering?

I am often asked “what is systems engineering?”. My detailed reply if called for is along the lines:

Systems engineering is a set of principles and supporting methods, based on systems thinking, for the successful engineering of solutions to problems. The approach is based on related process elements that are selected and integrated for use in response to a given set of circumstances to maximize the value delivered to applicable stakeholders, having regard to uncertainty.

Mastery of systems engineering spans requirements analysis (requirements capture and validation), physical (structural) design, logical design (the logic of how the system is to work), effectiveness evaluation and decision making (the conduct of trade studies), specification of system elements, system integration (building the system in development), verification of work products (job right?), validation of work products (right job?), integration into the engineering of specialty engineering disciplines, and systems engineering management (management of the engineering where a systems approach is being used).

Together these process elements, applied recursively and with degrees of iteration dependent on novelty, complexity and stability of need, embrace the totality of systems engineering practice, when applied to social, socio-technical and technical systems, including systems for development, production, maintenance, retirement, disposal, and other system life cycle processes, as applicable.

Do you view SE the same or differently?

Jean-Luc WIPPLER, Ph.D.

Senior Crazy Architect, Systems Thinker at Cap Gemini Engineering

3 年

Note: My purpose is not to criticize Robert's proposal, but rather to share my frustration with you. I have come across many definitions of what systems engineering is. Unfortunately, I have to admit that none of them is really operative, let alone performative. With the benefit of hindsight, I have drawn the following summary, classifying them into three categories: Those of the type "systems engineering is a problem-solving approach" and with various adjectives to specify the type of problem (complex, system, etc.). And so, in a certain sense, systems engineering is synonymous with plain engineering, meditation or reflection, political commitment, associative commitment, etc. ?? The one of the type "systems engineering is a set of activities, methods, techniques, ..." and sometimes by explicitly listing: requirements engineering, design, integration, verification, validation, and so on. It is then curious, for an approach that claims to be based on systems thinking, to dwell on the specification of elements, sometimes in an extensive way, rather than on the interactions between these elements, and thus on the expected emergences. On the other hand, any genius, or any art, can also be defined as a set of activities, methods, techniques, ... A third interesting category trumpets systems engineering as a "comprehensive, multidisciplinary, holistic, recursive, systemic and systematic effort, ..." This gives a hint of what it should be, but not how it is done. It does not give clues about what is the essence of systems engineering work.

Pete Dietert

Software, Systems, Simulations and Society (My Opinions Merely Mine)

3 年

I totally agree with everything said. But for a simpler explanation to non-practioners, I would go with something like, "It's deliberately and meticulously gathering, organizing, and arranging the key concepts about a problem or situation, with careful consideration for the outcomes and consequences of those concept arrangements." Admittedly that definition is a bit too artsy for practitioners, but it seems to sit well with intelligent non-practioners.

Sergey Tozik

Systems Integration Scientist - Start Integrated, Stay Integrated

3 年

I would say that Systems Engineering is an "art and science" of integrating technologies into solutions for problems. Technology without problem is R&D (startups are notorious for this) , solving problems without technology is management or politics.

回复
Adam Balfour

Founder and CEO of Human Factors Solutions AS, Norway

3 年

All Systems are ( should be) designed to serve a purpose. And that purpose is to serve people. So SE is all about designing systems that serve a human need.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Robert Halligan的更多文章

  • Integrating PM and SE: Summary of Articles Originally

    Integrating PM and SE: Summary of Articles Originally

    SyEN 54 – June 21, 2017 Main challenge of the book: how to successfully bring together two established and valued…

    7 条评论
  • Form Follows Function - A Gem of Wisdom?

    Form Follows Function - A Gem of Wisdom?

    Often I hear professionals from various technology and application domains and of different experience levels…

    6 条评论
  • Making sense of the OCD, CONUSE, OpsCon, CONOPS alphabet soup

    Making sense of the OCD, CONUSE, OpsCon, CONOPS alphabet soup

    Making sense of the OCD, CONUSE, OpsCon, CONOPS alphabet soup Understandably, a great deal of uncertainty and confusion…

    5 条评论
  • Avoiding Unintended Interactions Between Elements of a System Solution

    Avoiding Unintended Interactions Between Elements of a System Solution

    A client this week asked me a question along the following lines (I’ve edited the question a little to protect the…

    7 条评论
  • Reflections on the INCOSE International Symposium 2021

    Reflections on the INCOSE International Symposium 2021

    I have a saying, “The two best ways of spending a week on systems engineering are firstly to participate in PPI’s 5-day…

    2 条评论
  • Why should risk never be weighted?

    Why should risk never be weighted?

    In engineering and in life, level of risk often differs between solution alternatives, so we need to factor risk into…

    5 条评论
  • Reflections on the INCOSE IW2021

    Reflections on the INCOSE IW2021

    By any criteria, the INCOSE International Workshop 2021 (IW), delivered virtually, was a great success for the 689…

    6 条评论
  • Systems Engineers or Systems Engineering, Part 2

    Systems Engineers or Systems Engineering, Part 2

    In June 2020 I posted a brief article questioning the distinction between systems engineers and other engineers. In…

    23 条评论
  • Q&A From my Webinar: V&V and the Wedge Model(TM)

    Q&A From my Webinar: V&V and the Wedge Model(TM)

    Q1? Are there legitimate opportunities to use Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) to reduce the Verification &…

    7 条评论
  • VOC is Great! QFD is not!

    VOC is Great! QFD is not!

    A client asked me during the week why I do not advocate the use of Quality Function Deployment (QFD). I feel the answer…

    4 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了