What is intranet success?
https://balloonsdelivered.com.au/balloons/letters-numbers/

What is intranet success?

Consider your intranet successful if:

  • 60% or more of your intranet target audience view content at least once a day (where the intranet is not the default organisational browser home page), and
  • 24% or more of the intranet target audience contribute content at least once a day (contributions can include posting a comment, updating a page, contributing to a discussion, uploading a document).

At least these are the numbers according to a recent survey completed by 218 participants. The survey consisted of 2 intranet adoption questions and 3 demographic questions.

Note: Assume these numbers are for a normal working day. If your intranet software provides you with average unique daily visitors, don't forget to factor non-working days into your calculations. 

Adoption questions and results

Below are the questions related to intranet adoption.

Q1. “In your opinion, what percentage of employees would need to VIEW content on the intranet at least ONCE A DAY for you to consider it to be successful? Note: Assume that the intranet is NOT the default organisational browser home page and that employees would need to explicitly go there to view content.”

Q2. “In your opinion, what percentage of employees would need to CONTRIBUTE content (eg. post a comment, update a page, contribute to a discussion, upload a document) to the intranet at least ONCE A DAY for you to consider it to be successful?”

To calculate the 60% and 24% figures, I multiplied the number of responses for each option by the midpoint of each percent range and then divided the total by the number of responses. The results are as follows:

The three demographic questions were:

  • How do you define an intranet? An intranet includes...(select all that apply)
  • How large is your organization (# of employees)?
  • What is your role in relation to intranets?

We can use these demographics to further analyse the numbers to see if there are any variations based on how people define an intranet, the size of their organisation and their role in relation to intranets..

Intranet definition

How often an intranet is viewed and how often employees contribute content depends to a large extent on how an intranet is defined. For example, if co-authoring, document management and email is considered to be part of the intranet, you would expect content contribution to be much higher.

This survey question asked participants to define an intranet by selecting from a range of options. Based on these responses, we can analyse a variety of scenarios depending on what functionality is included. The results were as follows:

So does it make a difference to the results if we exclude certain functions from the intranet?

Let’s say the ‘typical’ intranet includes all the functions that received 50% or more of vote. So if we exclude all responses that include one or more of the options that fall below the 50% mark (eg. Calendars, Co-authoring, etc), we are left with 30 responses. The results are as follows:

While the sample size is relatively small, we could say a ‘typical’ intranet requires only 50.7% of the target audience to view content at least once a day with 13.1% contributing.

Similarly, what if we excluded email and discussion groups from the response?

Again, though it’s a small sample size, the results vary from the overall response.

It’s possible to perform many of these ‘what-if’ type scenarios. To help people and organisations carry out their own analysis, I have created a Google sheet that contains all the survey responses:

Intranet Adoption Success - worksheet

Anyone can access this sheet, download to a spreadsheet and then filter various functions to see what the impact is on the benchmark percentage.

This makes it possible to exclude the functions that are not included in your own intranet and create a benchmark tailored specifically for your organization.

Size of organisation and intranet role

I used the same filtering approach above to see if there was any impact in relation to the size of the organisation and role in relation to the intranet.

The results indicate that expectations tend to decrease for larger organisations, with the percentages becoming lower as organisation size increases. From 68% of employees viewing content for organisations with 0 - 100 employees down to 55% for organisations with more than 10,000 employees.

The role of survey participants had virtually no influence on expectations.

What does it all mean?

How do you determine the success, or otherwise, of your intranet? It’s the million dollar question and there are many ways to answer it. What business value does it add? How does it contribute to the business? How important do end users think it is? How much time does it save? Are employees more engaged and more productive than they would be without the intranet?

This benchmark of course doesn’t provide the answers to all of these questions. It simply provides a rough idea for how much end user activity people perceive a “successful” intranet would generate. But perceptions count for a lot.

I have written before that a good case can be made for linking increased frequency of intranet use with increased value to the organisation. So while a benchmark based on the opinion of 218 people is perhaps not the most scientific way to calculate intranet value or success, it’s not a bad place to start. And it’s a much better option than having nothing at all for the intranet team to aspire towards,   which seems to be the case with many intranets.

What do people think? Is 60% of employees viewing content each day a reasonable measure of intranet success? Is it realistic? Is it achievable? Has anyone achieved it?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Andrew Wright is the founder of the Worldwide Intranet Challenge (WIC), the world's largest benchmark of intranet end user satisfaction.

If you are interested in benchmarking your intranet against more than 200 other participating organisations, why not consider participating in the Worldwide Intranet Challenge online benchmarking service. You could have a personalized benchmark report on your desk within 2 weeks.

Mike McMinn

CTO / CMO / Co-Founder at MyHub Intranet Solutions Limited

8 年

Thanks, great piece, so much so that we've referenced and linked to your article in our latest blog post on https://www.myhubintranet.com/best-intranet-solution-4-easy-steps/

Kanwal Khipple

We are hiring; CEO @ 2toLead, Angel Investor ??, Microsoft 365 and Business Applications MVP

9 年

Thank you for sharing this and great to see so many of those in the industry that I admire providing their insights. For the dozens of portals we've launched since 2toLead's inception, we are metric-first. Providing insights into usage for individual/group/corp has been so valueable to customers. Agree that Intranets are expensive but what's probably more expensive is organizations making decisions based on passive metrics rather than seeing real time impact.

回复

Good to see quality evidence based commentary and feedback from one of the leading intranet specialists.

Frantisek Kohanyi MCP

Retired #SharePoint #SharePoint Online #M365 Professional

9 年

Very useful

回复
Daan Hannessen

Global Head of Knowledge Management at Shell

9 年

Thanks Andrew, interesting findings indeed. I would like to add two thoughts: - I would consider that 60% of visitors per day successful if I would only know how large the operational group of an organisation is represented in that 60%. Far too often I see claims of intranets being successful because of a high daily visitors rate, only to discover that the majority of those visitors are coming from the back-office/functional groups. Now there is nothing wrong with these staff members visiting your intranet but most intranets are set up to support the front-office/client facing/fee earning groups in the organisation. And if that is the case, you would want to know if that 60% really represent that part of the business, right? - Daily contribution is certainly a good method for measuring success of an intranet but, again, I would like to add one condition: it is a valuable number if those contributions are done entirely voluntarily, not by some gaming incentive (ie the more you contribute, the more points/stars/bonuses you earn) or management push. Thanks, Daan

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Andrew Wright的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了