What Is Stress Testing?
In business, stress testing is a technique used to test the resilience of institutions and investment portfolios against possible future financial situations. The financial industry customarily uses such testing to help gauge investment risk and the adequacy of assets and evaluate internal processes and controls. In recent years, regulators have also required financial institutions to carry out stress tests to ensure their capital holdings and other assets are adequate.
Key Takeaways
Understanding Stress Testing Across Industries
Stress testing is widely used across various industries to test the resilience and reliability of systems, processes, and products. For example, stress testing is employed in the engineering and manufacturing sectors to determine the limits of materials and components. This can include subjecting materials to high levels of pressure, temperature, or mechanical strain to understand their breaking points and ensure they meet safety and performance standards.
Software stress testing involves pushing applications to their limits by simulating high traffic, processing large amounts of data, or running the software for extended periods to identify potential failure points. This type of testing helps developers ensure that applications can handle real-world demands such as high user loads during peak usage times without crashing or slowing down.
In healthcare, stress testing can take on a more literal meaning. Medical stress tests, such as those used in cardiology, involve placing the human body under physical stress to monitor how the heart and other systems respond. This type of testing is used to diagnose diseases. By monitoring the body's response to stress, healthcare providers can make informed decisions about patient care and treatment plans.
Stress Testing In Financial Institutions
Companies that manage assets and investments commonly use stress testing to determine portfolio risk , then set in place any hedging strategies necessary to mitigate against possible losses. Specifically, their portfolio managers use internal proprietary stress-testing programs to evaluate how well the assets they manage might weather certain market occurrences and external events.
Asset and liability matching stress tests are widely used, too, by companies that want to ensure they have the proper internal controls and procedures in place. Retirement and insurance portfolios are also frequently stress-tested to ensure that cash flow, payout levels, and other measures are well aligned.
Regulatory Stress Testing
Following the 2008 financial crisis, regulatory reporting for the financial industry—specifically for banks—was significantly expanded, focusing on stress testing and capital adequacy, mainly due to the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act .
Beginning in 2011, new regulations in the United States required the submission of Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) documentation by the banking industry. These regulations require banks to report on their internal procedures for managing capital and carry out various stress-test scenarios.
In addition to CCAR reporting, banks in the United States deemed too big to fail by the Financial Stability Board—typically those with more than $50 billion in assets—must provide stress-test reporting on planning for a bankruptcy scenario. In the government’s most recent reporting review of these banks in 2018, 22 international banks and eight based in the United States were designated as too-big-to-fail.
Currently, BASEL III is also in effect for global banks. Much like the U.S. requirements, this international regulation requires documentation of banks’ capital levels and the administration of stress tests for various crisis scenarios.
领英推荐
Stress testing involves running computer simulations to identify hidden vulnerabilities in institutions and investment portfolios to evaluate how well they might weather adverse events and market conditions.
Types of Stress Testing
Stress testing involves running simulations to identify hidden vulnerabilities. The literature about business strategy and?corporate governance?identifies several approaches to these exercises. Among the most popular are stylized scenarios, hypotheticals, and historical scenarios.
Historical Stress Testing
In a historical scenario, the business—or asset class, portfolio, or individual investment—is run through a simulation based on a previous crisis. Examples of historical crises include the?stock market?crash of October 1987 , the?Asian crisis of 1997, and the?tech bubble ?that burst in 1999-2000.
Hypothetical Stress Testing
A hypothetical stress test is generally more specific, often focusing on how a particular company might weather a particular crisis. For example, a firm in California might stress-test against a hypothetical earthquake or an oil company might do so against the outbreak of war in the Middle East.
Stylized scenarios are a little more scientific in the sense that only one or a few test variables are adjusted at once. For example, the stress test might involve the?Dow Jones ?index losing 10% of its value in a week.
Simulated Stress Testing
As for the methodology for stress tests, Monte Carlo simulation is one of the most widely known. This type of stress testing can be used for modeling probabilities of various outcomes given specific variables. Factors considered in the Monte Carlo simulation, for example, often include various economic variables.
Companies can also turn to professionally managed risk management and software providers for various types of stress tests. Moody’s Analytics is one example of an outsourced stress-testing program that can be used to evaluate risk in asset portfolios.
When performing stress testing, things may break. This could actually be seen as a good thing, as the testing process revealed a process or product deficiency that can now be addressed before final implementation.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Stress Testing
Stress tests are forward-looking analytical tools that help financial institutions and banks better understand their financial position and risks. They help managers identify what measures to take if certain events arise and what they should do to mitigate risks. As a result, they are better able to form action plans to thwart threats and prevent failure. For investment managers, they are better able to assess how well managed assets might perform during economic downturns.
To perform stress tests, financial institutions need to create the framework and processes for which the tests can be performed.1 This restructuring is complex and is often associated with costly mistakes. For example, it's possible that the test scenario does not represent the types of risks a bank may face. This may be due to insufficient data or the test designer's inability to create a relevant test. In the end, the results of the test may lead to the creation of plans for events not likely to occur. This misrepresentation can cause institutions to ignore the risks that are possible.