What to say at work about this weekend’s violence
By Charles Chesnut and Ethan McCarty
This weekend we witnessed a tragic act of political violence: an assassination attempt against former President Trump, which injured him and others and took the life of an innocent rally attendee. This shocking event has dominated the news and many personal conversations over the past two days. And it comes immediately before the four-day Republican convention, which will inevitably amplify the discussion.
How should organizations respond? How should we talk about or take action related to the upcoming presidential election? At Integral we’ve been thinking about these issues for a long time; in fact, we recently published a guide to these very issues. For now, let’s focus on the immediate questions our clients are asking.
Should we say anything?
In recent years, businesses and other organizations have weighed in on political and social issues. Some, like Harvard University, have stepped back somewhat, announcing that they will only comment on subjects related to their core mission. Meanwhile, more than 50% of the American workforce believes they have the right to speak with colleagues about social and political issues and feel comfortable doing so. Whether your organization should make a statement is a decision for you to make; here are some factors to consider:
What should we say?
There are a few obvious statements that should lead off any message about the assassination attempt; they are the messages we’ve already heard from business and political leaders and they’re worth repeating and amplifying:
With those things said, we recommend pivoting to “what this means for us.”
These messages might include:
领英推荐
What should we not say?
You don’t need to acknowledge “negatives,” because that will only reinforce them in employees’ minds. For example, we would advise against saying things like:
We also advise against any commentary on the behavior of political actors, even if you’re trying to be neutral. What you think is neutral can easily be perceived as “false equivalence” by interested parties. For example, avoid statements like:
How can we best navigate the next four months?
As mentioned above, Integral has published a guide to addressing this question, and it includes links to a number of external resources as well.
We've thought a lot about politics in the workplace, not only in working with clients but by doing our own independent research.? We’re here to discuss this with you and share ideas at any time.