What is a Radio Brand?

What is a Radio Brand?

Cumulus Media confirmed that New York City’s iconic FM radio station 95.5 PLJ will sign off for the last time on Friday, May 31. Clearly, there was no longer a profitable business to be made using FM radio broadcasting technology to aggregate and monetize the PLJ audience. (It was purchased by Education Media Foundation, the owners of K-LOVE Christian radio, earlier this year.)

Radio stations change ownership all the time and, as you know, media M&A has become a blood sport in the past 24 months. Still, this particular sign-off signals something significant – the end of a brand.

Apples to Apples in the Big Apple

From sign-on to sign-off, promoting tune-in was the central focus of all of PLJ’s on-air and cross-channel advertising. Contests, requests, value-added promotions… if you can think it up, PLJ has tried it over the years. They spent hundreds of millions of dollars promoting tune-in, but they weren’t building a brand; they were simply offering a better choice to people who were already using (or were likely to use) FM radio technology to access musical entertainment. The competition was other radio stations – not the internet, not the web, not the recorded music business – just other radio stations.

The strategy was clear: “If you’re a radio listener and you like to listen to what we play, please remember to tune in.” PLJ’s promotional efforts were laser focused on AQH (average quarter hour) ratings against its radio competitors; they completely ignored other ways that people might be accessing musical entertainment. PLJ was a radio station. Full stop.

What About PLJ, the Brand?

It’s pretty easy to argue that outside of broadcast radio, the PLJ brand has no value. Could you start a streaming service called PLJ and have anyone outside of the NY metro area even recognize it? Was there unique content or a unique delivery mechanism that set PLJ apart from every other radio station that played similar music and had similar DJs?

Since 1983, PLJ has been programmed with Top 40 or Hot AC (Adult Contemporary) content. These musical formats are a commodity. They are available commercial free on Music Choice, Spotify, Pandora, Amazon Prime Music, Apple Music, Google Play Music, to name a few. Objectively, PLJ had nothing special to offer.

What fascinates me is that even though PLJ has been promoting itself relentlessly for the better part of 36 years, the best it can hope for as it rides off into the sunset is to sell a few commemorative T-shirts.

Could PLJ have survived as a radio station? Probably not. Could the PLJ brand have been leveraged to build a profitable audience delivery system using the internet or wireless broadband networks? Doubtful. Is there a well-defined PLJ audience that can be leveraged post-sign-off? We’ll never know.

Things to Think About

What business was PLJ in? PLJ was a radio station. It made money by estimating the size of its audience, taking a best guess at the value of each audience segment, and selling advertisers access to those segments at the highest possible price. Take the delivery technology out of the equation and there is nothing left.

How many other content distribution companies are so inextricably linked to their delivery mechanisms that they could not survive a technological transformation? Could, for example, Waze’s display advertising model survive in a world where self-driving cars are programmed to get from place to place with no drivers to look at the screen? How long will printed newspapers be profitable to print? How prepared are newspaper companies to transform into digital competitors? Can they? Will you care how the self-driving car you buy performs? You’re not going to drive it.

There are many brands that transcend specific distribution channels, merchandise, and service form factors, but there are many others that are in significant danger of becoming irrelevant as the technology they have dominated becomes obsolete. So long, PLJ… we hardly knew ya!

Author’s note: This is not a sponsored post. I am the author of this article and it expresses my own opinions. I am not, nor is my company, receiving compensation for it.

About Shelly Palmer

Named one of LinkedIn’s Top Voices in TechnologyShelly Palmer is CEO of The Palmer Group, a strategy, design and engineering firm focused at the nexus of technology, media and marketing. He is Fox 5 New York's on-air tech and digital media expert, writes a weekly column for AdAge, and is a regular commentator on CNBC and CNN. Follow @shellypalmer or visit shellypalmer.com or subscribe to our daily email https://ow.ly/WsHcb

Robinson Roca

Managing Director, Network Infrastructure and Managed Services - Helient Systems LLC, Cisco Champion 2019-2024, CCNP/CMNA/et al.

5 年

This station is a staple of NY culture. It will be sorely missed.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Shelly Palmer的更多文章

  • The Famous “P&G Memo”

    The Famous “P&G Memo”

    Want to be a better strategic thinker? For most businesspeople, the time-tested P&G (Procter & Gamble) Memo is a great…

    7 条评论
  • Uber and Lyft Are Doomed

    Uber and Lyft Are Doomed

    Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are about to dramatically change the world of on-demand car services. Viewed through that…

    29 条评论
  • I Don’t Have Time for the Truth!

    I Don’t Have Time for the Truth!

    I was checking out my Twitter feed the other day and I came upon a tweet from Richard Dawkins. He is one of my favorite…

    2 条评论
  • You’re Worried about Facial Recognition? WTF?

    You’re Worried about Facial Recognition? WTF?

    In a rare show of bipartisan unity this past Wednesday, Republicans and Democrats on the House Oversight Committee…

    2 条评论
  • A “Duty of Care” for Facebook

    A “Duty of Care” for Facebook

    French regulators have recommended requiring a “duty of care” for big social networks, meaning social networks should…

    3 条评论
  • Digital Transformation Is Seriously Misnamed

    Digital Transformation Is Seriously Misnamed

    Our main business is helping big brands, big media, and big tech with their digital transformation journeys. This is an…

    8 条评论
  • An EPCOT for the 5th Industrial Revolution: Showcasing the Possible

    An EPCOT for the 5th Industrial Revolution: Showcasing the Possible

    In 1877 Thomas Edison invented the phonograph. He liked to demonstrate his device by allowing people to speak into the…

    1 条评论
  • Music by AI – A Warning Label Is Now Required

    Music by AI – A Warning Label Is Now Required

    Last week, The Verge asked the question, “AI is capable of making music, but does that make AI an artist?” Wow, is that…

    6 条评论
  • The Next Great Decoupling: AI Takes Control

    The Next Great Decoupling: AI Takes Control

    Last night I binge-watched the latest three episodes of Star Trek Discovery, which set up the season 2 finale – spoiler…

    211 条评论
  • China Has Already Won. But We’re Fighting the Wrong Fight!

    China Has Already Won. But We’re Fighting the Wrong Fight!

    While I was in China this past week, Google dissolved its 10-day-old AI ethics council. Why? Because of AI bias, a…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了