What Is Project-Based Learning?
XQ Institute
XQ's mission is to transform America's high schools so every student can succeed.
Project-based learning allows students to learn by doing. Here's everything you need to know and how to get started in your classroom.
Let’s start with some stories.
Now here’s a pop quiz:
In each of these stories, students:
As is true of many multiple-choice test questions, the correct answer is “all of the above.” Because they’re all features of project-based learning (PBL), which students experience regularly at XQ schools as well as other schools committed to more meaningful, engaged learning experiences? They probably would not have that kind of experience at a traditional high school, although PBL is growing in popularity and is on its way to becoming an important feature of 21st-century education.
[
]
Despite signs of change, however, most high schools in the U.S. (and their equivalent in other countries) are still operating on the “factory model” of education that began in the late 19th century. Students move through the “assembly line” of separate subjects, in separate classrooms, on a regular bell schedule, sitting passively as teachers fill their heads with knowledge and accumulating credits based on seat time and a minimal level of competency. XQ schools are different; they are based on design principles that challenge the factory model, and a project-based approach to teaching and learning is a key part of many programs.
What Is Project-Based Learning??
Here’s a definition from PBLWorks/Buck Institute for Education, a leading advocate for PBL and a provider of materials and professional development:
“PBL is a teaching method in which students gain knowledge and skills by working for an extended period of time to investigate and respond to an authentic, engaging, and complex question, problem, or challenge.”
However, educators have defined PBL in different ways throughout its history and many stereotypes about it still exist, which we’ll address later in this article. People may commonly conceive of project-based learning as simply doing some sort of “hands-on” activity at the end of a unit. Or they may think of it as a way to apply what students have already learned through traditional instruction. Both conceptions are limited.
The basic idea is that students learn by doing. They don’t just passively absorb knowledge delivered by a teacher, they gain it actively. Educator John Dewey, an early proponent of this approach, put it this way in Democracy and Education: “Give the pupils something to do, not something to learn; and the doing is of such a nature as to demand thinking; learning naturally results.”
A key concept for understanding PBL is that it creates a “need to know” for students. When students ask, “Why are we learning this?” the answer is typically, “because you’ll need to know it later (for the next course, the next grade level, for college, etc.)” or “because it’s on the test.” Neither answer is very motivating for students; they’re extrinsic. In an authentic project, students see the application very clearly; “we’re learning this because we need it to accomplish this important task or answer this meaningful question.” This gives them a more powerful, intrinsic motivation to learn.
In the three project snapshots mentioned at the top of this article, students were motivated by an authentic need to know; they learned science, history, and civics, used math, read, wrote, presented their ideas, and created media. They gained 21st-century skills like critical thinking, communication, collaboration, problem-solving, and creativity.? Consider another example from Iowa BIG, an XQ school in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. High school students planned and carried out an ambitious project that involved several academic subject areas with the intention of celebrating and bringing together their community. Their motivation to learn is clear, as you can see in this video:
PBL’s Relationship to Other Educational Practices
PBL is generally tied to constructivist theories of learning, bolstered by brain research, in which students actively construct knowledge rather than passively receive it. PBL is also associated with inquiry-based learning, service learning, and place-based learning—all of which can include a project of some sort. We should note that “PBL” also stands for problem-based learning, a close cousin of project-based learning.
Project-based learning also connects to other prominent 21st century practices in education, like:
Defining High Quality PBL
As educators become more interested? in project-based learning, some of its advocates worry that it will become a fad if it is not done well and does not deliver the promised results. They’re right to be worried; PBL is not a simple teaching method and it’s not hard to find examples of poor execution (see the “doing projects” section to follow). Lack of rigor is a common problem with how PBL is implemented. Some projects become merely a fun activity instead of a standards-focused, in-depth learning experience worthy of the time it takes.
Thankfully, educators have come up with good guidelines. The Gold Standard PBL model, created by the Buck Institute for Education, is one well-known example of an attempt at quality control. Another is theFramework for High Quality PBL, established in 2018 after a collaborative process that included PBL experts and prominent PBL school networks.
The HQPBL Framework lists these six criteria for what students should experience in a high-quality PBL project:
The Difference Between Projects and Project-Based Learning
Many teachers and school leaders will say, “we do projects” and believe that’s PBL. But they’re not the same. Here are some typical examples of what students do when they “do projects,” not PBL:
These kinds of projects can serve a valuable purpose. They’re engaging, perhaps, and students might learn something or reinforce what they’ve already learned. But these projects do not feature all six of the criteria in the High-Quality PBL Framework. Dewey made the important point that what students are asked to do must “demand thinking.” In short, the learning has to be rigorous. That’s one of the main differences between simply “doing projects” versus the much more in-depth process of project-based learning. The table below shows additional differences.
领英推荐
Stereotypes About Project Based Learning
Despite the recent growing interest in project-based learning, the term comes with baggage attached from the past. Here are some common stereotypes about PBL, followed by a more nuanced and contemporary view:
Stereotype #1: In PBL, students pick a topic they want to study, do research, and present information.
There may be occasions when this type of project is appropriate, but the topic and the research process should connect to important learning goals. And there should be an authentic purpose for presenting the information, in a particular medium, to a particular audience (unlike the U.S. president “project” above). Most PBL projects should be designed by curriculum specialists or the teacher, or co-designed with students, with the topic and products selected for specific standards and instructional purposes.
Stereotype #2: In PBL, the teacher acts mainly as a facilitator and does not directly “teach” the content; students learn it on their own.
The role of the teacher does shift in PBL, but not entirely. The teacher still provides a structure for the project, monitors and coaches students regularly, and directly builds students’ knowledge and skills as appropriate. Students may learn some of what they need to know and find answers for their inquiry questions through research, using online resources, or interviewing experts or other people beyond the classroom. But the teacher should use their judgment about the best way for students to learn what’s needed for a given project. Sometimes, the best way is for the teacher to just teach it.
Stereotype #4: In PBL, students always create a tangible (or digital/media-based) object that is the “project.”
Think of a “project” you might do in your everyday life as an adult. It might be to create something tangible, like a wall of family photos, a vegetable bed, or a new play structure for the kids. But it could also be an event, like a party or a wedding. Planning a vacation or painting a room is a project. Same goes for PBL projects; some involve creating physical objects, but some culminate with a presentation, a performance, a service, or an event. The process is the most important part of the experience; that’s where the learning happens.
Stereotype #5: In PBL, the focus is on “soft skills” and it is not effective for teaching “content.”
It’s true that, in the past, some students’ PBL experiences did emphasize engagement over learning and were more about collaboration, creativity, and “independent learning skills” rather than academic knowledge and skills. (Not that these 21st century success skills are not valuable, as we’ll discuss in the next section.) However, recent conceptions of PBL, like the Gold Standard PBL model and the HQPBL Framework, put academic learning goals at the center. Projects should be designed to teach specific standards and disciplinary concepts and skills, and the research on PBL supports its effectiveness, when done well. For example, in two studies released in 2021, third graders and high school A.P. students whose teachers used a PBL curriculum had higher test scores in science and social studies than students who were taught traditionally. In another study from 2020, researchers found that second grade students from low-income families who were taught with PBL had higher test scores in literacy and social studies.
Why Project-Based Learning Is Important
Simply put, the goals of project-based learning are (a) to improve outcomes for students, and (b) to make school more engaging. These goals are linked, of course: the purpose of greater engagement is to promote better learning. We’ll discuss the outcomes piece in a moment, but first I’ll explain why I like to put both goals front and center.
Student Engagement and Project-Based Learning
When I was a high school teacher, I was acutely aware of how bored students usually are by traditional instruction. Students know how to play the game and (most) are willing to go along with the familiar routine of lectures, textbooks, worksheets, and homework assignments. But they’re not engaged by much of it.?
In a 2018 survey of high school students, about a third said they were bored “most or all of the time.” Only a quarter said they were “barely ever or never” bored in school. There’s data suggesting students grow more disengaged as they move from elementary to secondary grades. In a 2016 Gallup poll, 74 percent of fifth graders reported feeling engaged in school, compared with only 32 percent of 11th graders.
However, high quality PBL can make a big difference by motivating students with projects that address real-world issues, directly connect to potential career interests, or that speak to young people’s lives, cultures, and identities.?
Three other aspects of PBL make it engaging for young people.
One is the public product. In traditional instruction, only the teacher typically sees a student’s work–or sometimes their peers if it’s a presentation or something displayed in the classroom. Sharing work with people beyond the classroom ups the stakes for students; no one likes to look bad in front of an audience or present a shoddy piece of work to someone whose opinion you care about. If students have been in contact with experts, stakeholders, real-world organizations, or anyone else beyond the usual classmates and teacher during a project, they want to do well.
Then there’s the technology angle. Projects often include the use of tech tools for communication, collaboration, and creation, which most young people today enjoy using.
Finally, most projects involve teamwork, which tends to engage people. Students stay engaged because they don’t want to let their team down, find it rewarding to think and create together, and feel a sense of pride in group accomplishment. This isn’t true of everyone, of course; some students, and adults too, find it challenging to work with others and prefer going it alone. I’d argue that they need some collaborative experiences, too.
Student Outcomes and Project-Based Learning
The research on PBL has seen mixed results over the years, often due to widely varying quality of implementation and lack of agreement about what is high-quality PBL. However, more and more studies are showing it leads to better academic outcomes, when designed and implemented well. As outlined by Getting Smart, the goals of project-based learning are to:
Equity and Project-Based Learning
There are additional important reasons for a project-based approach beyond the benefits to individual students.?
The first is equity. A common myth about project-based learning is that it’s not for all students. Some teachers and school or district leaders might say, “our students are not ready for PBL” because they have low test scores, and need to be taught “the basics” first, with an emphasis on test-prep. Or they might say their students are too undisciplined and cannot handle the independent, self-directed nature of project work.?
Typically, educators who raise these objections are talking about students from lower-income families and BIPOC groups. Other groups for whom PBL is often deemed inappropriate include English Learners and special needs students.
However, research has shown PBL can work for all students. As the above-referenced study of second graders found, project-based learning can have a statistically significant and positive impact on student achievement among high-poverty, low-performing elementary schools, where most participating students were from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups.
With the right support, PBL can even be a force for educational equity, for several reasons:
Finally, PBL is important for teachers too. Many teachers today feel dispirited by the drive to improve test scores through mandated direct instruction, using off-the-shelf materials. They see the faces of their disengaged students. For teachers who learn to do PBL well, however, it’s a different story. They see students who are excited and motivated to learn. They’re asking questions, pursuing answers, connecting their learning to the world outside the classroom, and creating high-quality work they’re eager to share publicly. According to Finkelstein in a 2010 study, “Effects of problem based economics on high school economics instruction,” teachers who use PBL report being more satisfied with their teaching methods–and I’ve heard teachers say it’s the way they’ve always wanted to teach.
Seeing is Believing for Students in Project-Based Schools
Another challenge to project-based learning is that students don’t have much experience with it. Students who have been taught throughout their school years in the traditional way may even resist PBL if they are suddenly introduced to it. They may only equate “learning” with listening to teachers talk, taking notes, reading textbooks, and memorizing material for tests. That was the case at Crosstown High, an XQ school in Memphis, Tennessee. But as you can see in the following video, 9th graders there learned a lot more with a PBL approach than they thought they had, and were surprised by their high scores on the state’s standardized test.
Regardless of the reason you are interested in learning more about project-based learning, we hope you’ve been inspired by examples like those shared above. Learn more about approaches to meaningful, engaged learning and high schools leading the way.
Project-based learning is a gem in cultivating curiosity and real-world skills! ?? Aristotle once said - The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet. PBL is that fruit, offering students a taste of practical knowledge. Dive in, explore, and watch your classroom transform! ??#EducationEvolution #PBLPower #LearningByDoing
Senior Advisor, Policy Research & Development at New York State Education Department
1 年h/t Amalia Schiff--thanks for bringing this to my attention!