What Politicians are Getting Wrong about Free Trade
The attacks against trade agreements overlook their wide-ranging benefits.
You’ve probably noticed that free trade isn’t getting much love these days. I read the other day that bashing trade has replaced kissing babies as the most popular behavior among presidential candidates. The writer was only half-joking.
When candidates seem unanimous in their disdain for agreements that would lead to new jobs and help exporters grow their businesses, I have to take a stand for reason and reality.
UPS supports trade agreements because they help make the world a safer, more prosperous and more fascinating place in which to live. In the business world, trade creates more competition. That not only benefits consumers, who have more products to choose from, but it also levels the playing field for small- and mid-sized enterprises – helping them compete with companies that have far more exporting experience and far greater resources.
The Trans-Pacific Partnership, which is awaiting final approval, is the largest and most substantial free trade agreement in history. It connects 12 global economies and 800 million consumers across the Americas and the Asia-Pacific region.
By eliminating thousands of taxes in the form of tariffs that countries place on Made-in-America products, TPP makes sure American businesses can compete in the world’s fastest-growing regions.
By eliminating over 18,000 taxes—in the form of tariffs—that various countries put on Made-in-America products, TPP makes sure our farmers, ranchers, manufacturers and small businesses can compete—and win—in some of the fastest-growing markets in the world.
The World Bank estimates that by 2030 TPP will raise GDP by an average of 1.1 percent and will boost exports more than 10 percent for 12 member countries. In addition, the Peterson Institute for International Economics forecasts that delaying TPP by one year would cost the U.S. economy $77 billion.
Trade and e-commerce
Even though international online shopping is the new normal, trade agreements have failed to keep pace. Outdated customs rules, a lack of transparency about the rules of trade and so-called “data protectionism” hinder businesses from taking full advantage of the digital economy.
The TPP was crafted with digital trade in mind. It establishes standards to make sure trade expands as fast as the Internet demands.
Based on forecasts, digital trade will continue to gain momentum. That’s because traditional retailing is being disrupted by two unstoppable forces: consumers with unlimited expectations and technologies with unprecedented capabilities.
Online sales topped $1.6 trillion worldwide in 2015 — including a 35 percent increase in the Asia-Pacific market, the fastest growing region in the world. In 2015, e-tailers grew more than 11 percent vs. brick-and-mortar’s 2 percent.
While domestic e-commerce is predicted to grow four times the pace of GDP through this decade, global B2C will grow seven times the rate of GDP growth during the same time.
Trade is our business
UPS is playing a major role in the e-economy. Increasingly, it’s a bigger and bigger part of our business.
Trade is not a choice. It’s an inevitability. The only variable – and it’s a crucial one – is how our companies and our nation are positioned to compete and win.
Our company is in the business of helping our customers connect to a world of opportunity through the strength of our network and our people. That puts us at the center of the e-economy.
In full disclosure, trade is good for us. Our business sees a spike every time a trade agreement is passed. We also add or secure a job for every 22 packages that cross a border using our network.
The benefits of trade extend to every segment of the economy and every level of society. In fact, there’s a large body of economic research showing that the sharp increase in global trade since World War II has contributed to increases in life expectancies, women’s rights and household incomes – and declines in child labor, poverty and military conflicts.
At UPS, we tend to be pragmatists. When you’re delivering 18 million packages a day – as we do on average – you see the world as it is. Complete with challenges and opportunity.
Pragmatism also means that we cannot make simplistic arguments. Simply saying “Trade is good – period” is not good enough. We must do everything we can to create equal opportunities for those who are not able to participate in modern commerce or who are displaced by the pace of change.
We’re at a critical juncture in the history of commerce. There has never been more trade policy activity, never more momentum. Never more need to get trade agreements, starting with TPP, over the finish line.
Reality says we must think and act beyond the rhetoric of protectionism and fear.
The world economy and the consumers who support it are sending a clear message. The world will divide between those who listen and those who don’t. It’s time to choose a side.
David Abney serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of UPS. This commentary was adapted from a speech delivered at the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce’s Global Impact Awards event on April 20, 2016.
FELLOW CIPS (UK)
5 年The impact of free trade in the world economy is enormous but the restrictions we are beginning to experience is causing a lot of concern hope we stop a while and ponder what the end results will be if we push further the envisaged restrictions on world trade.Solomon Okon, FCIPS,Managing Consultant, Nisskam &Associates Ltd?
I serve as Manager - Distribution Strategy & Excellence at Masco
8 年Trying to explain widely diffuse benefits (lower consumer goods prices) and concentrated costs (manufacturing job losses) is a tough task in the 24 hour news cycle. On net, the benefits for the hundreds of millions of US consumers outweighs the job losses over time. Trade is a long-term strategy and investment. Sadly, neither political party has the will/guts/honesty to explain this to the public. I appreciate Mr. Abney for weighing in on such an important issue for my generation.
Regional Sales Manager - Ophthalmics @ SUN PHARMA | Leading, motivating, developing team
8 年That's great perspective. I am curious, when you say "also add or secure a job for every 22 packages that cross a border using our network", are you using "job" in the sense of employment or task?
Head of Investments at Koev Brothers Private Investor Group, Veteran
8 年Trade is a wonderful concept and has existed since the dawn of time. Shady deals like the TPP, however, are the next step for the multinationals and conglomerates to establish their dominance over nations and their citizens. Praising such agreements is not just a great PR tool for many global C-Suite executives, it's more than that, it will assure them an amazing golden parachute after their few years reign is up. This leads to more wealth-concentration at the top while the rest (99%) of Americans have to "compete" globally by not being a burden to their employers. This happens when they accept: - to forever live in the Rat Race - lower-paying, part-time meaningless jobs (the good ones were outsourced long ago) - end of overtime and previously-enjoyed benefits - corporations to pollute their environments, water and food supply - to lose the freedoms and liberties they once had Don't worry, the Government will step in and protect its people from the global predatory, power and profit-hungry corporations. That happens in the ideal world, though. In reality, the public servants lack the courage, drive and determination to stand up for the interests of the people they are entrusted to represent. More info on the TPP below https://www.citizen.org/TPP https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trade-deal-confirms-advocates-worst-fears_us_563b9061e4b0411d306ff765
Assisting B2B-OEM leadership to grow profits by supplying Productivity, Longevity, Availability and Capability Solutions [PLACS] impacting the lifetime value of the assets populating the Installedbase.
8 年Most countries employ economic systems in which the government controls directly or indirectly the enterprises supplying products and services; it is their right to have different economic models than that of the US, but this can lead US companies to be at a distinct disadvantage. The primary disadvantage is that "zombie" enterprises (e.g. based upon GAAP reporting enterprise would not qualify as an on-going business) can be supported by the government due to cronyism, preventing social unrest due to loss of jobs, strategic efforts at entering markets whatever the cost or others. My suggestion regarding trade policy between the US and ANY nation; if you want to do business with the US an enterprise MUST be audited and conform to GAAP as an on-going business. This is simple and effective; all we want is that products and services imported in the US play by the same rules as US-based companies.