What Part of No Don't You Understand?
Alec Baldwin in David Mamet's Glengarry Glen Ross, 1992

What Part of No Don't You Understand?

I have no idea who first snapped off the classic response to pests of all sorts, “What part of no don’t you understand?” But I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it was aimed at a salesperson, probably a graduate of Alec Baldwin's training class at Glengarry Glen Ross University.

I’ve always thought that the correct response to the rhetorical barb was to beat an immediate and hasty retreat. However, I may be wrong about that when it comes to sales.

In their book, When Buyers Say No: Essential Strategies for Keeping a Sales Moving Forward, sales consultants Tom Hopkins and Ben Katt parsed “no” and found that it can have a variety of meanings. It might indicate that the buyer has unanswered questions and concerns about the offering, or might not be sure how it compares to the alternatives in the marketplace. Maybe the buyer isn't clear about the benefits of the offering or doesn’t like the logistics or timing or terms of the deal. Or maybe the buyer just doesn’t like the salesperson—a big factor in any sales arena that requires an ongoing relationship.

The upshot of all this, write Hopkins and Katt, is that if you’re a sales professional, you better figure out exactly what the prospective buyer means by “no” before you head for the door. To steal a line from John Belushi's inspiring rallying call in National Lampoon's Animal House, the sale isn't over until you decide it is.

The challenge is how you manage the buyer's “no.” If you treat it like an objection and try to overcome it, chances are good you’ll get handed your hat. Being asked to make a decision at the end of the close creates discomfort in the buyer, and too often, salespeople compound that discomfort by becoming unlikeable in response to a negative answer.

“How do salespeople become unlikeable after the close?” ask Hopkins and Katt. “They become tense. Their facial expressions reflect unhappy feelings of disappointment or impatience. Even worse, they become subtly belittling, implying with their nonverbal communication that anyone with commonsense would have said yes by now.”

This jives with something I read in another good book, Conversational Intelligence: How Great Leaders Build Trust, by the late Judith E. Glaser. “Most people assume meaning is embedded in the words they speak,” wrote the executive coach and organizational anthropologist. “But according to forensic linguists, meaning is far more vaporous, teased into existence through vocalized puffs of air, hand gestures, body tilts, dancing eyebrows, and nuanced nostril flares.”

Glaser accompanied reps at a drug company on their sales calls. She found that when doctors raised objections about the products they were being sold, the salespeople usually communicated their displeasure with nonverbal cues, such as stiffened bodies, pained facial expressions, and tense tones of voice. The doctors, in turn, responded by stiffening up themselves and trying to end the sales calls. Unsurprisingly, reports Glaser, the company where these reps worked was ranked 39th among 40 pharmaceutical firms in terms of sales effectiveness.

Interestingly, the authors of both books offer similar solutions to negative buyer responses. Hopkins and Katt say that you should run through their “The Circle of Persuasion” again. That’s their generic four-step sales process: establishing rapport, identifying needs, presenting solutions, and closing questions. So, the first step after hearing “no” is to reestablish rapport by letting the buyer “know that it is okay that he didn’t immediately say yes.” In Glaser’s case, she taught the pharmaceutical salespeople to reframe buyer resistance as “simple requests for more information.” This shifted the focus of the call “to relationship before task” and significantly bolstered sales.

The bottom line: When it comes to sales, the way you respond can go a long way to determining whether the question, "What part of no don't you understand?" is a dead end or an invitation to a mutually beneficial engagement.


[An earlier version of this article was published in strategy+business. ? 2014 PwC. All rights reserved.] 

Yuliya Shtaltovna

Professor of Intercultural and International Management, Program Director of International Business Management (B-IBM & MIBuMe), Researcher

5 年

To my understanding, when it comes to this phrase it means that either party of the dialogue has decided to come into the open aggression phase. If we are speaking of sales, it shouldn't be the aim to come to a conflict point, therefore the means and tactics of the sales process were not chosen wisely. Anyway, communication matters! Thanks for the article, Theodore!

Tim:? not a great recruiting movie for young sales people.? The rest of us have received the steak knives!

Shawn Pelletier

Acting National Asset Class Manager Electronics and Informatics at Canadian Coast Guard/Garde c?tière canadienne

5 年

This is great advice

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Theodore Kinni的更多文章

  • 'Singular Achievement' Is an Oxymoron

    'Singular Achievement' Is an Oxymoron

    In May 2017, historian Walter Isaacson, formerly CEO of the Aspen Institute and CNN, came to my hometown to deliver the…

    47 条评论
  • Inside Mexico's Anemic Economy

    Inside Mexico's Anemic Economy

    Searching for Modern Mexico: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the New Global Economy by Nathaniel Parish Flannery…

    48 条评论
  • Disney CEO Robert Iger’s Testimonial to Empathy

    Disney CEO Robert Iger’s Testimonial to Empathy

    In June 2016, Bob Iger was in China overseeing preparations for the opening of Shanghai Disneyland. It was the…

    131 条评论
  • No Purpose? No Problem

    No Purpose? No Problem

    “I’m not here to give you the standard commencement about finding your purpose. We’re Millennials.

    485 条评论
  • Peter Drucker’s Advice to Aspiring Leaders

    Peter Drucker’s Advice to Aspiring Leaders

    Five time-proven practices from the pioneering management thinker There aren’t a lot of business books from more than a…

    315 条评论
  • Complex or Complicated? The Difference Matters to Leaders

    Complex or Complicated? The Difference Matters to Leaders

    You probably use the words 'complex' and 'complicated' interchangeably. Most of us do.

    43 条评论
  • Are You Paying Lip Service to Work-Life Balance?

    Are You Paying Lip Service to Work-Life Balance?

    Most CEO memoirs suggest that their families are getting the short end of the stick The statistics on paid time off in…

    37 条评论
  • Loki the Trickster Isn't a Model Leader

    Loki the Trickster Isn't a Model Leader

    Thirty years ago, the business world had a fling with chaos theory—the idea that systems, like markets and companies…

    14 条评论
  • Marty Sklar on Walt Disney and His Wonderful World

    Marty Sklar on Walt Disney and His Wonderful World

    Marty Sklar passed away a year ago today. He was a legend in the Walt Disney Company (literally) and among Disney…

    35 条评论
  • What Experience Would You Like With That?

    What Experience Would You Like With That?

    An annotated tour of the literature on customer experience Greetings from Williamsburg, Va., an outpost on the new…

    8 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了