What if our universe was always here and the rules and laws of reality itself triggered the Big Bang, that the universe’s own rules forced it to exist

That is almost what I say. I don’t say that the universe was always there because you might think that I am saying that the Universe, with all stars, planets, etc, was already there 14 billion years ago or a trillion years ago. People would laugh if I were to say that.

So, your statement lacks details… clarification… One cannot really understand what you are saying without creating their own model of reality.

I explain the creation of the Universe by postulating a precursor of Space - which I am going to call Q…:) (to be cute).

So, Q is a quantum system with canonical coordinates (dimensionality, metric) and canonical conjugates (rate of dimensionality change, rate of metric change). This is easy to understand since they map to x and p (position and momentum). As with any Quantum System, Q is subject to the Heisenberg Principle.

So, when the Universe (a spatial manifold with a given dimensionality and containing matter - which I explain to be made from deformed space) is around, the fluctuation persists because of an entropic barrier to recombination.

For you to understand what is an entropic barrier to recombination, remember the rhyme:

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall.

Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.

All the king’s horses and all the king’s men

couldn’t put Humpty together again.

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall.

Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.

All the king’s horses and all the king’s men

couldn’t put Humpty together again.

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall.

Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.

All the king’s horses and all the king’s men

couldn’t put Humpty together again.

Now consider that Q created a 4D Spatial Manifold (always one extra dimension to what we think to be the Universe dimensionality) and a Heisenberg-Principle-Dictated-Metric-Fluctuation.

I chose to represent this 4D object (the Initial Hyperspherical Metric Fluctuation live in a 4D Spatial Manifold) with a 2S orbital (a 3D Object) because it contains a node separating two regions.

The node represents the separation between CONTRACTION AND DILATION.

Dilation should be in the inner layers and contraction in the outer layers, exactly like in Prince Rupert Drop:

Was the Creation of the Universe an Entropic Explosion - A Hyperspherical Prince Rupert’s Drop

Watch the video and you will realize that I am providing a clear physical analogy to the mechanism for Universe creation. No bullshit.. no hand-waving… just the facts

A little later:

Now it should become clear why I used the reference to Humpty Dumpty. The Outermost Contraction Layer (a smooth region of a 4D spatial manifold where space was contracted), fragmented and gave rise to the Blackholium (a 4D spatial object containing FLAT HYDROGEN - a precursor to neutrons and, eventually, to hydrogen). Blackholium's name was coined because it is a Black Hole with a specific shape (hyperspherical shell) .

As you might expect, as it expands, it becomes the Neutronium (a Neutron Star Density hyperspherical shell) full of neutron matter.

Since the probability of a given Universe depends upon both the size of the metric fluctuation (which maps to its total mass) and the dimensionality. If you consider a given size (a given n-D radius), the probability scales with the volume of the initial n-D hyperspherical metric fluctuation:

I calculated that volume as a function of dimensionality and PREDICTED THE DIMENSIONALITY DISTRIBUTION OF UNIVERSES:

Here, I explained why the Universe has four spatial dimensions by calculating the probability of universes of different dimensionalities.

So, my theory is so advanced that it predicts the probability that our universe is like ours… and it is not infinitesimal (as in the multiverse bullshit). It is 11%!!!!

You can see our universe (n=4), right next to the peak probability.

I also used the CMB to predict the Galaxy Density across the observable and unobservable universe.

The Big Pop Cosmogenesis - replacement to the Big Bang

Big Pop Article

HU - The Big Pop Cosmogenesis Equation of State

Marco Pereira's answer to According to the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory (HU), where is our universe within the hyperspherical hypersurface?

I even located Earth in the 4D Map and named the region after my late Mother!

You might be surprised how much scientists don’t know, and I do…:)

Don’t feel bad for them. It is willful ignorance. They spent 18 years censoring my work because I debunked Einstein’s Relativity…:)

That might cost Mankind’s future because my theory provides the simple path to an Asteroid Defense System…. On the other hand, their censorship was for a good cause… preserve their statuses and Einstein’s good brand…:) It is all about the Benjamins…:)

IN SUMMARY

You are right about the Universe having rules that allow it to be created, and you are partially correct about “SOMETHING” always being there.

You are wrong to call that something the “Universe.” It is not. It is a precursor to Space.

I provided the rules, predicted Universe distribution, and calculated our universe size (initial 4D radius).

So, you got a B+

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS:

Martin Goldberg, Ph.D. , Dr. Domenico Meschino,Award Winner Author, Political Scientist,

Let's evaluate the arguments. The first thing to notice is the reference to Hugh Everett III. The problem is that Hugh Everett didn't understand Quantum Mechanics at all. He considered it OK to forget Schrodinger's equations and discuss the Universe's wave function as if the Universe were a Quantum Object.

That is wrong. Quantum Mechanics only exists while phase is preserved. Any dephasing event (a.k.a. observation) eliminates the uncertainty in the system. This means that if you have a 1 kg body where collisions occur every 15 femtoseconds and electronic collisions every attosecond, that is the time frame when that body is quantum mechanical.

Of course, the frequency will increase if you have a larger body. That is what distinguishes classical objects from Quantum Mechanical Systems.

So, there is no potential that is applied to the Universe as a whole... the Universe is not a quantum system. The same goes for the Schrodinger's Cat. That is a nonsensical idea...:) I am sure Schrodinger eventually disavowed the Thought Experiment.

That said, it is still around us, spreading nonsense.

Martin Goldberg, Ph.D. Said: If there were other universes, you wouldn't know.

In principle, that might be true. However, the argument loses strength when one considers my model. In my model, I make matter out of deformed space. This means that one doesn't need to think about "Energy" and talk about "Energy is Forever" because there is something that precedes Energy.

It is easy to consider a deformed region of space in which the center is dilated, and the outer regions are contracted. The energy to contract the outer regions comes from the energy released when dilating the inner regions.

It is easy to see that such deformation of space or anything would recombine and leave undeformed space.

In my theory, the universe exists just because this Initial Hyperspherical Metric Fluctuation PARTIALLY recombined. Had it fully recombined, there wouldn't be any matter. In HU, particles come out from the fragmentation of the Outermost Contraction Layer (OCL).

After the fragmentation, a Blackholium is formed, and all particles start surfing the Inner Dilation Layer (where the negative energy is located).

Notice that I mentioned negative energy because the IDL and the fragments (particles) will eventually recombine, and the Universe will be flat again. Since the observable Universe clearly has positive energy (despite of the BS by theoreticians), HU provides a clear source of negative energy.

In other words:

• There are models (e.g. Universe bubbles or island that are so far apart that you will never know about their existence - as Martin said).
• That said, such a model is even worse than the Big Bang., which is pure crap. The reasons are many:
• It doesn't tell you where the energy comes from... A model where a finite amount of energy is magically created is better than a model with an infinite amount of energy.
• No mechanism is proposed for the formation of bubbles or islands. It is much more complicated than the creation of a Metric Fluctuation, which is part of the current view of space. Today, we say that particles come in and out of existence in a vacuum. This is supported by the Heisenberg Principle. My theory proposes the same mechanism, but instead of particles, the fluctuations create the precursor of particles (a contraction layer).

IN SUMMARY

Martin

There are many models of the universe and many of them might have bubble universes, multiverses, parallel universe....etc.

They can be ordered according to QUALITY.

The Multiverse/Many World Interpretation of QM proposes that the universe is created every time someone makes a decision (or whenever anything makes a decision). That is idiotic.

Their support comes from a poor understanding of Quantum Mechanics and the "Fine Tuned Universe."

It just happens that there is no fine-tuning in the universe.

I derived the value of the Fine Structure Constant (one of the Cosmological Constants that is supposed to be fine-tuned).

I showed that the formula that yields the interconnnected value of alpha is such that

This formulation, where the dilation field decays in circles, is the one that creates an alpha that maps to the fine structure constant.

Another possible formulation, is to decay the field in hyperspheres. The "area" is 2 pi**2 R**3. where one uses R normalized to the Compton Wavelength of a Hydrogen Atom. If the intermediate states of the Fundamental Dilator didn't have any latency, R would be 1. If they have latency (they should), R is larger than one.

The value of alpha if there weren't any interaction in the universe would be 1/124.025 instead of 1/137

I used the discrepancy to find the latency associated with the four coherence states, which account for 3.38% of the Compton Period.

In other words, at worst, my theory derives the Fine Structure Constant FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES, with a 3.38% discrepancy. In reality, HU uses the Fine Structure Constant to find out that we only interact 1.69% of the time.

In other words, The Fine Structure Constant is the MOST MYSTERIOUS NUMBER, only in poor theories.