?? What is going on at OpenAI?
via @GavinSBaker on X

?? What is going on at OpenAI?

This was originally published earlier today in my newsletter Exponential View. If you become a paying member of Exponential View before Monday, 30 September, you will get a year of free access to one of my favourite AI research tools, Perplexity Pro.


Most of the top players have left OpenAI. CTO Mira Murati announced her departure on Wednesday, alongside VP of Research Barret Zoph and Chief Research Officer Bob McGrew. OpenAI is turning into a for-profit benefit corp and Sam Altman will get equity worth billions for the first time. The truth is, we don’t know what is going on at the organisation. But today I want to share some considerations to help us think about state of the firm.

1. OpenAI is NOT falling apart.

The claim that OpenAI is en route to a corporate calamity is, at best, clickbait. OpenAI is one of the fastest-growing companies in history. It doubled its ARR to $3.4 billion in the first six months of the year. If you’ve ever run a company, you’ll know how difficult it is to get anywhere near this growth rate. It’s got revenue resiliency from corporates and consumers directly. It signed a deal with the US government on AI research and testing. If that’s a train wreck, I’d like to know what a well-run train looks like.

2. OpenAI is becoming part of the national-security complex.

In January, the company changed its terms of service to remove the prohibition on using its products for the purposes of “military and warfare”. That same month OpenAI announced they were working with the Pentagon on open-source security software. We may not like it, but OpenAI is changing. There are many, many talented technologists who would not want to work at Palantir. The same may be true for OpenAI in 2024; Sam, and the board around him, may be willing to break the culture to complete this transition.

3. Sam’s part and the OpenAI dream.

Do employees trust Sam Altman? We don’t know. Perhaps his top executives don’t trust him, don’t like his choices, or just wanted a bigger slice of the pie.

While some successful tech firms, like Google and Microsoft, had stable leadership for years, others were full of drama. Consider Apple and Uber.

Karen Hao in The Atlantic characterises the latest departures as “Altman’s consolidation of power nearing completion.” That makes some sense… OpenAI has essentially abandoned its initial not-for-profit mission and the checks on its unalloyed power that structure offered.

It’s unseemly, of course. I was among many who heard directly from Sam about this novel ownership structure (see our public conversations in 2020 and 2023). Perhaps the stakes are too high for OpenAI to innovate in corporate governance that way. And if not the stakes, then it’s clear the potential payday is big enough to erase those promises from history.

4. No one knows how to run this kind of business, actually.

OpenAI and its ilk are a new kind of business. No one, not even Sam Altman, knows how to run it (yet). The company is building a technology that could impact initially every single one of the billion or so people who work at or near a desk. What other company has forced a reinvention not just of its industry, but also the semiconductor and energy industry? It’s ChatGPT that is a direct line to the revival of nuclear as a real contender in the US energy system (I’ll write more on this in the Sunday newsletter). There is no precedent.

5. Solo albums are more prolific.

The reports of burnout and turf wars are not surprising for a company that’s changed so drastically within two years. But there’s another way to look at this. Key players leaving could be reflective of a vibrant market, a market with more precedent for people to go off and start their own thing. We didn’t see this happening in the dot-com bubble where the cycle time was 5-7 years.

Cycles are much faster now – and there’s excitement around the opportunity to build something of your own at a time when AI use is shaping up. The decision worked out for the employees who left to found Anthropic (the latest rumours have its valuation floating around $40 billion), Ilya Sutskever who raised $1 billion for his new startup. Even Fei-Fei Li, best known for her academic and non-profit work, raised $230 million for her new AI startup (already valued at more than $1 billion).

Edmund Ayuk Bawak Egbe

Civil Engineer/Construction Manager @ Next Gen Developers | Project Management

5 个月

Truly Interesting update.

回复
Otmane El Hidaoui

AI & Data Transformation Leader | Ex-BCG, Accenture | Strategy & Execution

5 个月

Completely agree, Azeem—performance metrics look strong, but the talent leakage is significant. The question is, how will this impact OpenAI’s ability to sustain innovation? Will the ‘magic’ continue without these key players?

Dr. Paul Smith

Atmospheric Scientist | Climate Science | Ex-ICOS | Terra.do Fellow

5 个月

Maybe the three people who left were replaced by AI...

Michele Turpin

Solutions Principal @BairesDev | CHIEF | Advisor @USFCA ~ Women in Leadership | Advisor @AmotionsAI

5 个月

But why use this particular phrase: "Even Fei Fei ...". What do you mean by prefacing it with "Even"? ??

回复
David Friedman

Writing at davefriedman.substack.com

5 个月

There is tension, I think, between those who want to pursue OpenAI's original research-focused mission, and those who want to focus on building a business. And to the extent that investors funnel billions of dollars into OpenAI, business concerns start to become more prominent than research concerns. Wrote a bit about it here: https://davefriedman.substack.com/p/openai-is-not-dying

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Azeem Azhar的更多文章

  • ?? What's the deal with Manus AI?

    ?? What's the deal with Manus AI?

    Six things you need to know to understand the hype The online discourse around Manus AI typically falls into three…

    8 条评论
  • AI’s productivity paradox

    AI’s productivity paradox

    I want to play a game of counterfactuals..

    11 条评论
  • Why the AI surge isn't like 1999

    Why the AI surge isn't like 1999

    Economist Paul Krugman sees parallels between the late-90s tech bubble and today’s AI frenzy. In my conversation with…

    4 条评论
  • What OpenAI’s Deep research means for search

    What OpenAI’s Deep research means for search

    Originally published in Exponential View on 4 February OpenAI released yet another add-on on to its growing suite of AI…

    4 条评论
  • ??DeepSeek: everything you need to know right now.

    ??DeepSeek: everything you need to know right now.

    My WhatsApp exploded over the weekend as we received an early Chinese New Year surprise from DeepSeek. The Chinese AI…

    38 条评论
  • ?? Stargate & DeepSeek R-1 – What matters

    ?? Stargate & DeepSeek R-1 – What matters

    In the past week, a lot was written about the US government’s “Stargate” partnership with OpenAI AND DeepSeek R-1…

    12 条评论
  • Davos Daily, Day 1

    Davos Daily, Day 1

    The energy here is different this year, so I’ll share my daily takes from the Forum to help you understand what it’s…

    6 条评论
  • ?? Join me live on AI, deep tech & geopolitics

    ?? Join me live on AI, deep tech & geopolitics

    Hi all, I am going live in two hours from DLD — one of Europe’s most important annual events focused on the…

    5 条评论
  • Five contrarian ideas about genAI in the workplace

    Five contrarian ideas about genAI in the workplace

    ChatGPT alone sees over 300 million weekly users—roughly 7% of all mobile phone owners worldwide. Nearly a third of…

    13 条评论
  • ?? AGI in 2025?

    ?? AGI in 2025?

    We can't ignore Sam's bet that..

    11 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了