What does it really mean to be "empathetic"?
Shankar Thayumanavan
Author & ICF Certified Leadership Coach | Arbinger Master Facilitator | Positive Psychology Expert | Transforming Team Mindsets for Superior Outcomes | Guiding Individuals to Discover Their Deeper Spiritual Purpose
The word "empathy" as defined in the dictionary is "the ability to share someone else’s feelings or experiences by imagining what it would be like to be in that person’s situation". This word has become quite overused in professional circles of late. Would like to explore the deeper significance of the "act of empathy" in this post.
In order to appreciate what "empathy" really is, we need to understand the psychological make up of us human beings - what we call as the "Me". "Me" is a conditioning of the past. It is the sum total of our accumulated past experiences stored in memory as knowledge. The moment we identify ourselves with this "Me", we create a sense of separation between ourselves and the people around us. We create an image of ourselves and an image of others. So the interaction happens between these images that we have created, than the people themselves. In essence we are not in a position to relate to the other person once we have created an image of them based on our past experiences. For eg. let us say someone insults or hurts us. The next time we meet them we have an image of them as "someone who has hurt us" and the image of ourselves as "someone who has been hurt". So when we carry these images of the past, are we really able to relate to the other person?
These images that we carry cause the sense of separation between ourselves and the people around us. They are the source of all conflict and one's inability to "empathize" with the other person. We fail to truly understand the other person, rather see them through the lens of our conclusions, prejudices and biases about them. That way we simply fail to listen to the other person. How can there be "empathy" when we cannot "listen" to the other person?
How to end this sense of separation that we ourselves have created? Is this even possible? Of course it is provided we develop the right perception.
What does right perception mean? It means we are able to pay complete attention to the problem that we are confronted with. The problem could be of the nature of a conflict with the other person. Right perception means to be able to simply see what is happening without bringing in a sense of separation between the "Me" and the "You". This comes with a profound realization that the "Me" is the "You" and the "You" is the "Me". In other words there is no difference between the "Observer" and the "Observed"
With this deeper understanding we are in a position to keenly observe the images that get created of ourselves and others, the next time we face a conflict. In this keen observation with complete attention, the images cease to be and so does the sense of separation. Till this happens, whatever efforts we make towards "empathizing" are best superficial ideas which still retain the "Me" and to that extent are limiting, self-centered and egotistic acts leading to more chaos and conflict.
Designer of Digital Solutions | Lead Change with Enterprise Architecture
4 年Taking "Me" out of the equation could be lot easier compared to understanding the context that determines the "observed's" feeling. This will include the past experiences - said and unsaid of the observed. Even when you blend and make observed and observer the same, it is a challenge when there are lot of context that needs to be reconstructed from pieces that are not explicitly said by the observed. Lot of secondary reading and research may be needed before the observer and observed can visualise the same image rendered on the later's canvas
ICF Certified Leadership & Executive Coach, Mentor Coach, EMCC Senior Practitioner, Change Management Consultant and Trainer
4 年Great read Shankar
Fractional Chief of Staff | Strategic Advisor | Empowering CEOs/Founders to Design Human-Centered Organizations and Achieve Personal + Performance Excellence | Open to Fractional Chief of Staff Roles
4 年I agree that our feelings connect us as humans. It is the allowance and acceptance of another’s feelings that open the pathway for that connection and ultimately the ability to uncover needs which is the goal in creating innovation. This doesn’t necessarily mean we will share the same feelings about an experience. What leaves one person feeling sad and powerless, another may feel angry and empowered. However empathy is about not making one right and one wrong (that’s ego) but accepting of their emotions. Even if you felt the opposite emotion you still as a human understand the feeling of sadness and can empathize.Thanks Shankar for it is our thoughts and judgments about others emotions that separate us, that inhibit our relationships and our innovations.