What does the Mansion House speech mean for market participants?
The main melody of the Mansion House speech is clear. Growth?is a top priority for the Government. Financial services have an important?role to play, both through the expansion of the City itself, and by financing growth in other sectors.?
The melody is accompanied by an orchestration?of deregulation. The reforms introduced after the Financial Crisis have gone too far, and place too much emphasis on risk.
The remit letters to the regulators are more nuanced (here and here). The regulators are encouraged to continue meeting their primary objectives, but to do so in a way that allows for informed risk-taking. In the FCA letter this is applied to consumers as well as to market participants??
To be fair, the regulators have already heard the Government's music, and are playing some of the?instruments in their toolbox in harmony. The FCA is considering the boundary between retail protection and commercial insurance in the London Market. It has also put out a Call for Input asking for examples of regulations that may now be redundant. The PRA has now completed an overhaul?of Solvency II, with many deregulatory facets.?
BUT. The Chancellor does not provide many specific new examples of deregulation. The Certification Regime part of the SM&CR is to be abolished. Some further thought has gone?into the relationship between the FCA and the FOS, with a view to greater predictability in mass redress - though I recall that this has been tried a few times before. And note that there is no roll-back of the FCA's flagship Consumer Duty. Although promoting growth and more risk-taking, the Government shows no signs of reducing consumer?protection.
领英推荐
So what does this mean for market participants??
Hugh Savill , Senior Adviser
Head of Strategy and Regulatory Change at Phoenix Group. On secondment as Executive Business Manager to the Group CEO.
3 个月"The PRA has now completed an overhaul?of Solvency II, with many deregulatory facets." Quite a generous interpretation, considering the significant additional burdens that have "balanced" the slight relaxations or corrections to the old regime.
Group Compliance Director (SMF16 & SMF17) - NFP Europe
3 个月Revoking the certification regime is quite frankly a bonkers move. This will 100% dilute daily accountability for key functions within the business.