Building an In-House Cloud Development Environment Is Ruff
Some of the most innovative engineering and DevOps managers sometimes need to correct the mistake of treating a new software initiative as a single, well-defined one-off project. For example, let’s say that the internal initiative is engineering a simple, clearly defined cloud development environment.
Take it from these executives who tried building:
Mommy, I want a development platform!
Building software internally to service your company’s developers is often an endless, ongoing project to maintain and scale while accounting for many evolving complex connecting technologies worldwide. The blind desire for companies to have their homegrown development platform is often like the youthful enthusiasm to get a cute puppy.
In both cases, puppy love quickly gives way to the realization that there are long-term, serious responsibilities associated with its care. You have to ensure they are safe, secure, and bug-free. If there’s a problem, you must stop what you’re doing and take care of them morning, noon, and night. They both require much attention.
It turns out that owning a puppy - fleas et al. l - is a lot of work and costs a lot of money. So is building and managing a homegrown development environment. But it's easy to understand how engineering teams fall in love with the idea of building development environments. After all, who knows what engineers need better than the engineers themselves?
When software projects outside a company's core business are built, it usually starts when a developer or lead identifies a specific pain point in isolation and engages internal engineering resources to develop an in-house solution. At first glance, this approach makes sense, as internal engineering teams are good at building projects with a limited, well-defined scope. However, as your development team grows and your projects scale, so do the platform's requirements. Complex business processes often span multiple departments, including collaboration with - but not limited to - DevOps, security, product, QA testing, and more.
Raising a Development Platform is a Big Responsibility
More projects, people, and product features mean more potential problems. Sounds like rap lyrics, but this is the truth when it comes to building, especially a cloud development environment. You build it, you own it.
As puppies grow into big ferocious dogs, daily responsibilities continue and challenges can mount. It's the same problem development teams have with their homegrown solution. This predicament begs the question:?why spend countless hours having your most valuable resource capital (your engineers) architect a solution that already exists and is proven in the market?
For instance, generally, a vendor has already solved the same problem hundreds of times, bringing clients the benefits of best practices based on others' experiences. In addition, in most cases, the vendor gains efficiencies because of its large customer base, so it can often charge less for implementing and maintaining an established product than it would cost to support a one-off, homegrown solution.
When you flip the script, the solution provider owns the burden of product development, quality assurance, maintenance, platform migration, security,?and patch fixes. In contrast, in-house development requires years of continued development beyond the initial project scope. There’s an opportunity cost and total cost of ownership associated with that that is often overlooked.
Okteto customers who first tried building internally found it required an enormous allocation of resources and budget to create, implement and maintain something as comprehensive and proven. Whether to build or buy a cloud development environment revolves around these four key considerations:
*Ensuring features and functionality were best-in-class
*Supporting performance and maintenance at scale
*Managing the allocation of resources against core business needs
*Realizing the total cost of ownership is more than what it seems
Working with a proven partner to deploy a proven solution allows you to solve the problem more quickly and ensures complex questions, such as Kubernetes updates and security breaches, are answered with comprehensive support and development. Additionally, working with a reputable provider to deploy a proven development platform will allow companies to get up and running more quickly and ensure that teams can focus on what developers do best: innovation.
Ask yourself how much time and money it will take to buy software that fits most of your needs or build a solution from the ground up. And how much will either solution cost you long-term? For instance, creating a cloud development platform with the sophistication to work with Kubernetes could take three to five years. When you buy software, you get a well-trained best friend that the vendor constantly cares for, grows, and babysits.
While developing a solution in-house may initially seem like the best way to address your business challenge, more and more technology leaders are seeing the benefits of buying over building. Commercial solutions provide speed, scale, and efficiency that in-house solutions can’t match.?Building a cloud development platform can be ruff to manage and secure. As a result, more companies are asking cloud development vendors, "How much is that doggy in the window"?
Thought Leadership Writer and Editor
2 年Nice job extending the puppy metaphor and the headline is irresistible. Good marketing.