What are the differences between corporate and military leadership?

While there are differences between corporate and military leadership, it's important to note that leadership skills and principles can be somewhat transferable. Influential leaders in both domains often possess adaptability, communication skills, and the ability to inspire and motivate others. The advantages of military leadership are often lost in the recruiting process of most corporations.

In my analysis of diversity hiring focused on those who have honorably served our great nation, I have identified a disturbing trend. Corporations hire veterans only for lower-level positions, such as working in warehousing and making deliveries, as these roles are all about grinding, which those in the military have evident mastery of. However, corporate minds have not appreciated the value position of military leadership and what it can bring to the executive leadership teams.

Below are some key differences between corporate and military leadership:

Organizational Goals

Corporate Leadership: In the corporate world, the primary goal is often profit and shareholder value. Leaders are responsible for achieving business objectives, maximizing revenue, and minimizing costs to ensure financial success.

Military Leadership: The military's primary goal is national defense and security. Military leaders are focused on accomplishing missions, maintaining discipline, and ensuring the safety and well-being of their troops. Service to one's country and society reigns supreme over individual needs.

Hierarchy

Corporate Leadership: Corporations typically have a more flexible and dynamic organizational structure. Leadership roles vary widely, and executives and managers often make decisions collaboratively.

Military Leadership: The military operates with a strict hierarchical structure. Orders flow from the top down, and there is a clear chain of command. Subordinates are expected to follow orders without question, which is crucial for maintaining discipline and achieving mission success.

Decision-Making Process

Corporate Leadership: Decision-making in the corporate world often involves a collaborative and consensus-driven approach. Leaders may seek input from various stakeholders and consider various options before deciding.

Military Leadership: Military decisions are typically more centralized. Higher-level commanders have significant authority, and decisions are made swiftly and decisively. In combat situations, there may be little time for extensive deliberation.

Risk Tolerance

Corporate Leadership: Corporate leaders often deal with financial and market risks. They may take calculated risks to pursue business opportunities, but excessive risk-taking can lead to financial losses and negative consequences for the organization.

Military Leadership: Military leaders must assess and manage physical and operational risks, often in high-stakes and life-threatening situations. They are trained to make decisions that prioritize mission success and the safety of their personnel over more trivial concerns.

Performance Metric

Corporate Leadership: Corporate leaders are typically evaluated based on financial performance metrics such as revenue growth, profitability, and market share. Success is often measured in terms of financial outcomes.

Military Leadership: Military leaders are evaluated on mission accomplishment, discipline, troop welfare, and adherence to military regulations. Success is measured by achieving operational objectives and the troops' well-being.

Leadership Style

Corporate Leadership: Leadership styles in the corporate world can vary widely, from transformational and collaborative to more autocratic or laissez-faire, depending on the organization's culture and leadership philosophy.

Military Leadership: Military leadership often emphasizes discipline, obedience, and a command-and-control style. Leaders must lead by example and maintain a strong sense of duty and responsibility.

Conclusion

As Americans, we can and must do better. Our economy will suffer until we regain authentic leadership and learn that diversity must be more than virtue signaling but a tool to leverage our best and brightest at every opportunity. Both sides of the political spectrum can benefit from restoring genuine leadership practices in corporate environments.

A quick internet search shows articles from many recognized business leaders who endorse hiring veterans as a good business practice. Why? Veterans bring the following attributes and characteristics to the workplace:

• Proven leadership and leadership readiness?
• Mission-focused approach to work
• Experience working in diverse teams and organizations?
• Adaptable and immediate contributors
• Strong work ethics?

• Strong performance under pressure
• Creative problem-solving
• Self-starter
• Integrity

Please leave a comment and share with others who have served to raise their profile across Linkedin...

#enterprisearchitecture #enterprisearchitect #harvardbusinessreview #harvardbusiness #wallstreetjournal #mckinsey #mckinseydigital #mckinseyinsights #forrester #insurance #mba #mbalife #economics #economy #economicgrowth #economicoutlook #humancapitalmanagement #humanity #armedforces #usarmy #usnavy #uscg #semperfi #veteransday