What is the Difference Between Interviewing For Skill and Hiring for Character?

When it comes to hiring for a position, it can be a difficult decision for employers to make. Do they focus on finding someone with the specific skills and knowledge the job requires, or do they look for someone with the right character traits to fit in the culture of their organization? The answer is not always simple. In this post, we will discuss the differences between interviewing for skill and hiring for character and the pros and cons of each approach. We will also explore which approach is best for different types of positions and organizations.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Interviewing for Skills

Interviewing for Skills is a widely used practice by employers to help them assess the capabilities of potential new hires. This process enables employers to evaluate a candidate’s skill level and assess their qualifications for a particular job. However, there are both advantages and disadvantages to interviewing for skills, and employers should consider both when deciding whether to use this approach.

One of the primary advantages of interviewing for skills is that it allows employers to get a better sense of the candidate’s actual skill level. By asking questions and assessing answers, employers can determine whether the candidate has the necessary skills for the job. Additionally, interviewing for skills can help employers better assess the candidate’s personality and ability to communicate. This can be beneficial in determining if the candidate is a good fit for the organization.

On the other hand, there are some disadvantages to interviewing for skills. One of the biggest is that it can be time-consuming and expensive. Interviewing for skills requires employers to invest a significant amount of time in order to ask the right questions and make accurate assessments. Additionally, interviewing for skills can be subjective, as the interviewer’s own biases can influence the assessment. Similarly, interviews can be affected by a candidate’s social skills, which may make it difficult to accurately assess the candidate’s actual skill level.

Overall, interviewing for skills is a valuable tool for employers, but it is important to consider the pros and cons before deciding to use it. It is a time-consuming and expensive process, but it can provide employers with valuable information about the candidate’s qualifications and personality.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Hiring for Character

Hiring for character is a strategy that is increasingly gaining popularity among businesses of all sizes and industries. This approach focuses on assessing a potential employee’s personality traits, beliefs, and values rather than their skills and experience. While it can be an effective way to find the right person for the job, it also has its drawbacks. Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of hiring for character.

Advantages

1. Improved Company Culture: When you hire for character, you are essentially looking for individuals that align with the values and culture of your business. This can help improve the overall atmosphere of your organization and ensure that everyone is on the same page.

2. Loyalty: Hiring for character means that you are looking for people who will be loyal to your company. People who have strong values and beliefs are more likely to be dedicated to their job and stay with your organization for a longer period of time.

3. Better Communication: Hiring for a character can also lead to better communication and collaboration within the workplace. People with similar set of values and beliefs are more likely to understand each other and work together more effectively.

Disadvantages

1. Difficult to Measure: Character is a difficult trait to measure and assess. It can be hard to accurately gauge a potential employee’s values and beliefs during the hiring process.

2. Lack of Skills: While hiring for a character can lead to a more cohesive workplace, it can also mean that your team may lack certain skills and experience. If a candidate has the right values but not the right skills, they may not be the best fit for the job.

3. Discrimination Risk: When hiring for character, there is a risk of unconsciously discriminating against certain groups of people. It is important to be aware of this and ensure that your hiring process is fair and unbiased.

Ultimately, hiring for the character is an effective strategy for finding the right person for the job. However, it is important to be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of this approach in order to ensure you are making the best decision for your organization.

Bottom Line

The decision to hire for skill or character is ultimately up to the individual or organization. Both have their advantages and disadvantages, and it is important to consider both when making hiring decisions. Ultimately, it is important to keep in mind that both skill and character are important and it is often beneficial to hire for a combination of both. After all, the most successful teams are those who have the right combination of skills and character to get the job done.

#skill #character #strategicadvisorboard