What could have possibly gone wrong ?

What could have possibly gone wrong ?

From the pictures it is evident that vessel has swung violently to starboard without any speed reduction.

In this confined waters the most important aspect of navigation is to keep the vessel at the center of the channel (channel is not exactly U shaped more like cross between V and U) so vessel has to remain at the center with respect to the cross sectional profile.

Any displacement from the center line needs to be corrected immediately ,else vessel may swing to one side in an uncontrolled manner which is called "bow cushion effect" , if laterally displaced it may get sucked to the bank called "bank suction effect".

Based on the above fact and on my transits through Suez as VLCC master I think below are the few most probable scenarios ranked from highest to the lowest probability.

1) Steering Error

Vessel may have been drifting to one side and pilot orders port 10 rudder and the helmsman gives starboard 10 rudder(instead of port rudder by mistake a starboard rudder movement). Fatigue can easily set in when a person steers for prolonger period, once fatigued such confusion is known to happen.

AT this stage of swinging Pilot realizes the vessel needs more rudder and orders "port 15" and looks up to see the rudder is not port but starboard. Vessel now at rate of turn more than 10 deg/min to starboard , gathers momentum and within seconds runs aground at full speed. This whole event could happen in less than a minute which explains lack of VHF communications(at least until now no report of that in any media).

2)Pilot Error

Similar like above but pilots gives the wrong order, can happen due to fatigue/compaceny etc.

3)Steering malfunction

In this case the helmsman gave right rudder but telemotors or associated machinery responded differently. This event will initially cause a huge confusion in a normal bridge setting as alarms will be from various panels, reaction time may not be sufficient to respond and correct the situation.

4)Steering failure

 That is any hydraulic or electrical failure, this even may be a rare event and if this has happened there would have been time to warn others and slow down the engine etc.

5) Engine failure

Not a likely event , even if the engines fails the vessel will have enough momentum left to steer, warn others and take some evasive action including letting go anchors.

6) Cyber attack

Almost NIL as vessel most probably may be struggling to get proper data connection on VSAT. I know many people ashore exaggerate this threat and many at sea may equally discard this threat. If we realistically look at this risk then we can see how improbable this can be in a merchant ship as the net speed is extremely slow and only very few are even connected to the internet directly.

Steering system may be interfaced with rudder but again the whole bridge system is connected only occasionally to a very low bandwidth VSAT system, so I feel this threat is still not as probable as it is being made out to be, in future this risk will slowly creep up the list from being a low probable even to a highly probable event ,but as of now this will stay relatively low.

We will have to wait for the VDR recordings and proper investigation reports to conclude on this event, from looking at all the similar past events I will bet on the first or second scenario.

(All the opinions are completely personal and speculative like every other opinions currently being discussed)



Sohail Nazir

Fleet Technical Manager Pentacontinent DMCC

3 年

Your assessment is meaningful.

Premal Trivedi

Qualified Independent Director (IICA/MCA) | Ex-TATA | Fellow CA (ICAI) | DISA (ICAI) | CS Finalist (ICSI) I Risk & Corporate Governance Advisor I Open to Board, AC and Risk Management Committee Positions

3 年

Interesting analysis! Overloading owing to oversupply ... with bigger vessel size could be one apparent reason. The fact that ?shipping industry handles 90 percent of the world’s goods, and the ships size is becoming gigantic. Demand for shipping goods by sea has surged during the?Covid-19?pandemic, with spot prices for empty containers is estimated to have risen by more than 400 percent.?To add fuel to this fire, industry has lost more containers falling off the ships in recent months which is double the average of 2018 & 2019. Thanks for sharing. Also, read my like to read post on this subject : https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/premal-trivedi-81918015_containershipping-supplychain-logistics-activity-6780388943004336128-aa6H

Sagar Paranjpe

Captain at Maersk Tankers

3 年

While we are speculating. How about a combination of shared awareness, confusion, factors over-ruling safe navigation, loss of situational awareness, incorrect helm order/incorrect compliance by helmsman...Where she has grounded, there was no turn. The path behind and the route ahead were straight. So comes in the theory that she was off-centred and helm was needed to bring her back to middle of the canal.?My guess is that she had just passed Suez port. That’s where usually 1st change of pilots will take place. From sea pilot who helped her enter the canal to canal pilots.?In this region, with new pilots on board starts new negotiations / bargaining / deal-making...and even threatening when the Captain doesn’t fulfil their demands. Any seafarer who has ever transited the Suez Canal knows what’s being mentioned here.Maybe such ensuing drama of “give me-no can’t” was so engrossing that it shifted the focus & attention of the bridge team away from task at hand.?

Stephen Illingworth

Master (deep sea retired)

3 年

High cross winds and sandstorm has been mentioned so there is the possibility of a loss of visual references leading to the vessel moving off the channel centre line for a critical period. All the other factors of interaction and bank rejection then come into play. Vessel at deep draught also, so possible intake of sand and sediments (at channel limits) into the sea water cooling systems for ER and auxiliaries resulting in propulsion and power failure. At this stage it's pure conjecture!

Jan Slabbert

Shipping Lawyer | Shipping, the love of my professional life.

3 年

Very nice article. I think Captain Anand Raj is also right that the possibility of a cyber attack is extremely low. There have been cyber attacks on vessels, but those were almost all on oil rigs. The interesting part is claims that the vessel suffered a blackout. If indeed so, it would be interesting to know the root cause of the incident.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Capt.Anand Raj,CFA的更多文章

  • Blame the crew culture

    Blame the crew culture

    There are two vessels(a barge and a Tug boat) lost during this cyclone Taukate in the Arabian sea, both could have been…

    18 条评论
  • lMO 2020 Suplhur cap and its negative environmental impact.

    lMO 2020 Suplhur cap and its negative environmental impact.

    The 2020 requirement set by IMO to reduce the HFO sulphur percentage from 3.5% to 0.

    4 条评论
  • Lifeboats as Designated Rescue Boats.

    Lifeboats as Designated Rescue Boats.

    I feel designating one of the davit launched lifeboat as rescue boat is one of the cruelest jokes onboard a modern…

  • SOG vs SOW for RADAR /ARPA

    SOG vs SOW for RADAR /ARPA

    I know this is a controversial topic , but would like to know your practical view points . My view is as below…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了