What is Corporate Governance? Simple Illustration
Arif Zaman FCCA, CIA, CISA, CPA, CFE, CCSA, CRMA, CRBA
Head Internal Audit & Risk | xEY I xEmaar I xTelenor | Consultant | Trainer | Speaker | Author I YouTuber
I define Corporate Governance the way by which we can run the business effectively.
I always thought Corporate Governance (CG) is a pretty simple concept, but after a decade in a professional environment, I realized the concept is still confused by many professionals. Therefore, today I thought to give a brief explanation of the CG concept. There are many definitions of the CG, but I chose to keep this discussion simple in my own way to avoid unnecessary technical jargon.
Agency Theory
Before explaining the concept, it is important to understand the agency theory. Agency theory is used to understand the relationship between the Agent (company’s management team or managers) and the Principle (shareholder/business owner). The owner/shareholder of the company hires the executive managers to maximize their wealth, however, the executive managers (inherently) may have conflicting self-interest to maximize their income at the cost of the owner’s wealth.
In economics, we say moral hazard occurs when one person takes more risks because someone else bears the cost of those risks. We have seen this example in our daily life. The politician takes a decision on behalf of voters at times in their self-interest (help in their political agenda), which eventually affects the voters in the long run usually manifested by the negative consequences of their decision.
Similarly, in business, the executive management takes a decision which serves them to meet their short-term target to maximize their pay cheque (performance-based incentive) at the cost of company long-term growth. The following famous business scandals and many more demonstrate the agency problem:
- The fall of Enron – The executive manipulated the accounting report that made the stock seem more valuable than it truly was. After the scandal was uncovered, thousands of shareholders lost millions of dollars as Enron share values plummeted.
- Goldman Sachs and the real estate bubble – The financial analysts invest against the best interests of their clients in much risky mortgage-backed securities known as CDO’s, then sold them betting that the mortgages would undergo foreclosures. The bubble busted in 2008 and the prices of those CDO’s dropped, and the investors suffered at the cost of executive management decision.
How To Overcome The Agency Problem
The shareholders are sitting outside the organization and delegate to power to the executive management to run the business on their behalf to maximize their wealth while securing their long-term business sustainability and profit. The shareholders take some initiative under the CG concept to oversee the work of executive management, these are:
- The shareholders form a Board and nominate the Board of Director to oversee the work of the executive management.
- The Board make committees (comprises of the board member) to give special attention to certain areas e.g. remuneration and nomination committee (to oversee and decide the selection and remuneration of the executive management), audit committee (to oversee the companies operational controls effectiveness), risk committee (to oversee the risk exposure affecting the business) etc.
- These committees are assigned certain role and responsibilities and they make accountable management to perform their duties in the best interest of shareholders.
- The management develop operating procedures in the form of Policies and Procedures to run the business effectively.
- The management is accountable to the Board and it's committees on their performance.
- Eventually, these committees report to the Board and the Board is accountable in front of the Shareholders to safeguard their interest.
Does CG Effective To Curb Business Wrong Doing?
Not really, but these initiatives are a positive move in the right direction. It is always a challenge to regulate human greed which is ultimate behind most of the financial wrongdoing in companies.
Based on the above initiative, we can conclude the concept of CG is nothing but “the way by which we can run a business effectively”.
There are certain bodies in the world that have device the concept of CG into a set of rules and regulations and sometime in the form of legislation e.g. the United States Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) to protect shareholders and the general public from accounting errors and fraudulent practices in enterprises, and to improve the accuracy of corporate disclosures.
CG is still a new concept and evolving with the changes in the business environment. Like any other laws and regulations, the concept and the application of CG is maturing, and the legislators and government bodies are playing the catch-up roles to regulate the business doings in more ethical and effective manner.
If you find it useful, don't forget to Like and Share to impart knowledge and if you have something to add, comment below!
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Arif Zaman brings with more than a decade of proven experience in internal audit, risk management and fraud investigation. He is the Head of Internal Audit at Private Joint Stock Company based in Dubai, UAE. He holds a MSc in Professional Accountancy from University of London and BSc Hons in Applied Accounting from Oxford Brookes University along with an impressive set of professional certification including ACCA, CIA, CISA, CFE, CCSA, CRMA, CRBA, CPA and CGA etc.
For more immediate reading, here are some other posts I have written:
Technical Article
How to become Internal Auditor? How to Gauge Audit Department . Do not trust Artificial Intelligence . How to establish Internal Audit Department in 8 simple steps . Corporate Governance . Risk Appetite . Road Map to Data Analytics . Political pressure on CAE . Difference between the role of internal control, compliance, risk management and audit? . Internal audit is a dying career? . Internal audit - Innovate or stagnate . Internal audit insight from IIA President . Auditing business ethics . Business email compromise . Create a risk register in 4 steps . Cloud computing - Internal audit perspective . Annual risk assessment (4 steps) . Annual audit planning process (5 steps) . Role of internal audit in risk management . The impact of emerging technology on auditing . Family business governance . New IPPF 2015 (summary) . Internal audit function maturity curve . Real story - Ponzi scheme
Others
Feel like you are falling apart . My most vivid childhood memories . I think of my failure as a gift . Life changing story - From admin staff to TV anchor . Remove toxic people from your life . Africa is not a country . The best time of the day to do things at work . Build your personal brand . Pass the 6 second CV scan test
- CPA, CS, CIAQA
6 年Some of the components used to evaluate CG are fragmented but effective eg.Board evaluations that give an indicator of even board decisions and risk appetite
Head of Audit | Auditor, Financial Analyst, Engineer and Fraud Examiner | Streamlining Governance, Risk & Compliance
6 年Many current CG practices are unethical, impose risks for both directors and the firm as well as deny competitive advantages to organisations. However, none of the codes advocating best practices of CG appears to offer a test for defining when good governance is achieved. As it is now? corporate failures can still occur unexpectedly, even when firms are considered to have fully complied with governance codes…so why use them
Head of Audit | Auditor, Financial Analyst, Engineer and Fraud Examiner | Streamlining Governance, Risk & Compliance
6 年Great Read CG in most cases is used to enable the organisation to strengthen investor's confidence or public image but in it self- may not 100% assurance to the shareholders
CEO | CPA | Board Director | Big 4 Partner | Cybersecurity I Business Development | M&A | Innovation | Strategy | Private Equity Board of Advisors | Managing Partner, RSI Assurance | Managing Director, Mirante Partners
6 年Neville, in the USA there is a direct report relationship to the Audit Committee Chair in most public companies. If you know something about the profession you would know that the WorldCom fraud was uncovered by Internal Audit, albeit not timely at all.
Controller at Safefleet/RVS
6 年One of the oversight in CG that enabled companies such as Enron and WorldCom is that there is really no independence between the head of Internal Audit and management. Yes we have the boards such as the Audit Committee; but the head of IA reports to the CFO or someone in the hierarchy on the management side. True independence allow for IA to report material findings to the boards without reprisal from management. This is an area of CG that really needs a change. Comments welcome.