What to Check Before You Decide to Apply a Linear Regression Model
In our last post, we talked about the assumptions of the linear regression model: linearity, homoscedasticity, independence, and normality. These assumptions serve as the foundation for building a reliable linear regression model. However, validating these assumptions is just the beginning. Before you jump into applying linear regression, it's crucial to evaluate other aspects of your data to ensure you're not violating any other underlying assumptions or exposing your model to misleading results.
Here are several key things you need to check before you apply a linear regression model to your data:
1. Heteroscedasticity
Heteroscedasticity occurs when the variance of the residuals (errors) in your model is not constant across all levels of the independent variables. This violates one of the core assumptions of linear regression, which assumes constant variance (homoscedasticity).
How to Detect It:
- Residuals vs. Fitted Values Plot: Plot the residuals (errors) against the fitted values. If the plot shows a random scatter with no pattern, this suggests homoscedasticity. However, if the plot reveals a funnel shape (where the spread of the residuals increases or decreases with fitted values), it indicates heteroscedasticity. In this case, you may need to transform your dependent variable or include nonlinear terms in the model.
- Scale-Location Plot: This plot shows the standardized residuals versus the fitted values. If you don’t see a horizontal line with evenly spread points, it indicates that heteroscedasticity is present. The variance of residuals should be constant across all levels of fitted values, and any deviation from this indicates a problem.
Solution: If heteroscedasticity is present, you may need to transform the dependent variable (e.g., applying a log or square root transformation) or introduce nonlinear terms in the model to stabilize the variance.
2. Normality of Residuals
Linear regression assumes that the residuals (errors) are normally distributed. This is particularly important for conducting hypothesis tests and building confidence intervals. Non-normal residuals can lead to biased statistical tests.
How to Detect It:
- QQ Plot: A QQ plot compares the distribution of residuals to a normal distribution. If the residuals are normally distributed, the points should form a straight line. Significant deviations suggest non-normality.
Solution: If residuals are not normally distributed, you can apply transformations (log, square root transformation, etc.) to the dependent variable or use other methods like robust regression that are less sensitive to non-normal residuals.
3. Outliers
Outliers can disproportionately influence the regression model, leading to skewed predictions and incorrect inferences. It’s crucial to identify and assess their impact before proceeding.
How to Detect It:
- Cook’s Distance: Cook’s distance measures how much an observation influences the regression model. It calculates how much the predicted values for the dependent variable would change if the i(th) data point were removed. If the Cook’s distance for an observation is large (greater than 1), it suggests that the point has a significant impact on the model and may be considered influential.
Solution: You can choose to remove or adjust for outliers, but it's important to first assess why they exist in the dataset. In some cases, robust regression techniques can be used to reduce the impact of outliers.
4. Multicollinearity
Multicollinearity occurs when two or more independent variables are highly correlated. This can cause instability in the estimated coefficients, making the model unreliable and difficult to interpret.
Example: Consider a scenario where you're trying to predict user engagement on a platform, and two predictors are the number of Instagram posts made and the number of notifications received. These variables are likely highly correlated because both are related to user activity — more posts generally lead to more notifications. If these two variables are included in the model without considering their correlation, the model will struggle to distinguish their individual effects on user engagement, resulting in inaccurate coefficient estimates.
How to Detect It:
- Variance Inflation Factor (VIF): VIF quantifies how much the variance of a regression coefficient is inflated due to multicollinearity. A VIF value greater than 5 (or 10) indicates significant multicollinearity.
- Correlation Matrix: A high correlation (e.g., > 0.9) between two or more independent variables suggests multicollinearity.
Solution: To address multicollinearity, you can remove highly correlated variables, combine them into a single variable, or use dimensionality reduction techniques like Principal Component Analysis (PCA) or Partial Least Squares (PLS).
5. Confounding Variables
Confounding variables are third variables that are correlated with both the independent and dependent variables. These variables can distort the observed relationship between the predictors and the outcome, leading to incorrect conclusions.
Example: Suppose you are studying the effects of ice cream consumption on sunburns and find that higher ice cream consumption is correlated with a higher likelihood of sunburn. However, the true cause of both higher ice cream consumption and increased sunburn might be temperature. Higher temperatures lead to both more people eating ice cream and more time spent in the sun, which increases the risk of sunburn. In this case, temperature is a confounding variable, and not controlling for it could lead to the false conclusion that ice cream causes sunburns.
How to Detect It:
- Domain Knowledge: Confounders are often identified based on a deep understanding of the subject matter. Any external variable that affects both the independent and dependent variables could be a confounder.
Solution:
- Stratification: Divide the data into subgroups based on the confounding variable(s) and analyze each subgroup separately.
- Matching: Pair individuals with similar values for the confounder(s) across different levels of the independent variable or treatment. This ensures that the confounder is balanced across groups, allowing for a more accurate comparison.
- Multivariable Regression: Include the confounding variable as an additional predictor in the regression model.
Conclusion
As we discussed, validating core assumptions is essential, but it's just the first step in applying a reliable linear regression model. Addressing issues like heteroscedasticity, normality of residuals, outliers, multicollinearity, and confounding variables is crucial for ensuring the validity of your results. By using diagnostic tools and applying solutions for each problem, you can build a more robust model and avoid misleading conclusions.
Source
Book "Ace the Data Scientist Interview"