?? What chatbots make cheap
Credit: Midjourney / Exponential View

?? What chatbots make cheap

In the 1970s, few companies could afford computers. Large mainframes were expensive.?The IBM System/370?cost $4,674,160 in 1970 (about $35m in todays terms). The desktop PC revolution changed that. By the early 1980s, the entry price for a usable computer was more than 1,000 times lower than a decade earlier. Over the next 20 years, their sticker price declined gently, but their capabilities (described by?Moore’s Law,?Kryder’s Law,?Keck’s Law?and?Gilder’s Law) improved dramatically.?

The result was a huge expansion - a democratisation - in the number of organisations that could afford a computer. No longer was it NASA or Midland Bank or?American Airlines. Small firms were able to take advantage of digital computing. My parents’ small accountancy practice, initially just my late father and my mum in the East End of London, could afford an?Apple II Europlus?computer with 64k RAM and two floppy discs. Running an integrated accounting package from Basingstoke’s Padmede Computer Services, our computer supported the early growth of my dad’s practice.?

No alt text provided for this image
Source: Practical Computing Magazine

We’ve lived through the impact of technology’s exponential deflation. It leads to a democratisation of capabilities. Things only governments or large firms have access to become available to more and more firms across the economy.

Let’s use that lens to look at the impact of the modern cohort of AI tools based on large-language models, in particular chatbots.

I’ve been using OpenAI’s chatbot, ChatGPT, pretty heavily as an assistant over the past weeks. But I also use Bearly (for summarisation) and other tools, like WordTune. What expensive resource do these software machines mimic?

Continue reading this essay here.

ChatGPT is quite useful. It helps me move faster. It helps me when I’m not inspired. Etc etc … but after a while it’s a bit annoying and repetitive. And somehow I have a feeling it makes me overthink, over analyze…it makes me less creative! AI is all about efficiency and productivity. And too much of these can (in the long run) make us less creative and adaptable. So I think as we embrace these technologies (and I really think they’re quite useful) I hope we use our spare time challenging our creativity and other human skills.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Azeem Azhar的更多文章

  • ?? What's the deal with Manus AI?

    ?? What's the deal with Manus AI?

    Six things you need to know to understand the hype The online discourse around Manus AI typically falls into three…

    8 条评论
  • AI’s productivity paradox

    AI’s productivity paradox

    I want to play a game of counterfactuals..

    10 条评论
  • Why the AI surge isn't like 1999

    Why the AI surge isn't like 1999

    Economist Paul Krugman sees parallels between the late-90s tech bubble and today’s AI frenzy. In my conversation with…

    4 条评论
  • What OpenAI’s Deep research means for search

    What OpenAI’s Deep research means for search

    Originally published in Exponential View on 4 February OpenAI released yet another add-on on to its growing suite of AI…

    4 条评论
  • ??DeepSeek: everything you need to know right now.

    ??DeepSeek: everything you need to know right now.

    My WhatsApp exploded over the weekend as we received an early Chinese New Year surprise from DeepSeek. The Chinese AI…

    38 条评论
  • ?? Stargate & DeepSeek R-1 – What matters

    ?? Stargate & DeepSeek R-1 – What matters

    In the past week, a lot was written about the US government’s “Stargate” partnership with OpenAI AND DeepSeek R-1…

    12 条评论
  • Davos Daily, Day 1

    Davos Daily, Day 1

    The energy here is different this year, so I’ll share my daily takes from the Forum to help you understand what it’s…

    6 条评论
  • ?? Join me live on AI, deep tech & geopolitics

    ?? Join me live on AI, deep tech & geopolitics

    Hi all, I am going live in two hours from DLD — one of Europe’s most important annual events focused on the…

    5 条评论
  • Five contrarian ideas about genAI in the workplace

    Five contrarian ideas about genAI in the workplace

    ChatGPT alone sees over 300 million weekly users—roughly 7% of all mobile phone owners worldwide. Nearly a third of…

    13 条评论
  • ?? AGI in 2025?

    ?? AGI in 2025?

    We can't ignore Sam's bet that..

    11 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了