What are the best questions for an investor or founder to ask?

What are the best questions for an investor or founder to ask?

(SemiIntelligent Newsletter Vol 3, Issue 16)

The Heilmeier Catechism. It is a set of questions originally developed by George H. Heilmeier, a former DARPA director, to help evaluate and prioritize research projects. The Heilmeier Catechism consists of the following questions:

  1. What are you trying to do? Articulate your objectives using absolutely no jargon.
  2. How is it done today, and what are the limitations of the present approach?
  3. What is new in your approach and why do you think it will be successful?
  4. Who cares? If you are successful, what difference will it make?
  5. What are the risks and payoffs?
  6. How much will it cost? How long will it take?
  7. What are the midterm and final "exams" to check for success?

These questions are designed to force researchers and project leaders to think critically about their proposed work, its novelty, potential impact, risks, and feasibility. The catechism emphasizes clear communication, understanding the current state-of-the-art, and defining measurable success criteria. It is widely used in various research and development contexts to evaluate and guide projects.

I decided to apply it to a problem that I have been considering for some time. It was much more challenging than I expected to get clarity and that is why it is a really good tool!


Objective

The objective is to develop a program that promotes career paths for leaders, enabling them to navigate between public and private sectors. This initiative will support the development of individuals through DARPA-funded projects that produce commercially viable technologies that are considered dueal-use.. The dual-use technologies are defined as those beneficial to national security agencies such as the Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), as well as to commercial private sector entities.


What are you trying to do? Articulate your objectives using absolutely no jargon!

The goal is to establish a program that prepares professionals to invest and engineer deep tech pertinent to both national security and the commercial sector, facilitating their transition between governmental and private industry roles. Moreover, this will have the added benefit of driving closer collaboration between the public and private sector. This is advantage present in countries like China and Israel today.


How is it done today, and what are the limitations of the present approach?

Currently, structured pathways for professionals to seamlessly transition between public and private sectors while engaging with dual-use technologies are limited. Challenges include cultural differences, the complexities of obtaining and maintaining security clearances, and insufficient incentives for professionals to move across sectors. In addition, ownership rights and financial incentives are lacking and confusing.


What is new in your approach and why do you think it will be successful?

The innovative approach includes financing the development of dual-use technologies through DARPA, coupled with a career development plan that supports the professional transitions between governmental and commercial sectors. This strategy is expected to be successful due to the alignment of incentives, shared goals across technologies, and the establishment of a talent pipeline that benefits both sectors.


Who cares? If you are successful, what difference will it make?

Today, the time required for the government to deploy new technologies is equal to multiple product life-cycles in the private sector. The right incentives will shorten the path from invention to deployment for national security while at the same time reserving the value for commercialization. Professionals in these sectors would gain access to diverse experiences and enhanced career progression opportunities. The program is also likely to facilitate faster commercialization of government-funded technological innovations.


What are the risks and payoffs?

Potential risks include conflicts of interest, issues related to intellectual property rights, and the cultural integration challenges between sectors. Conversely, the expected payoffs are significant advancements in technology, economic growth, and a workforce that is both flexible and adept at handling dual-use technologies.


How much will it cost? How long will it take?

The financial requirements encompass funding for DARPA projects, administrative expenses, and incentives for participating professionals and companies. The implementation timeline envisages a phased approach, starting with pilot projects and progressing to a full-scale rollout over several years.


What are the midterm and final "exams" to check for success?

The midterm assessment will focus on the number of professionals who successfully transition between sectors, the development of successful dual-use technologies, and participant feedback. The final evaluation will measure the impact on national security capabilities, the launch of commercial products, and metrics related to talent retention and career advancement.


Summary

This analysis, guided by the Heilmeier Catechism, highlights the critical considerations, potential benefits, and challenges of the proposed program. It offers a detailed and structured evaluation of the concept, ensuring a thorough understanding of its objectives, innovative elements, impact, risks, and success measures.


Further Reading

https://www.depts.ttu.edu/research/ordc/Resources/heilmeier-catechism.php

https://medium.com/art-of-the-start/the-heilmeier-catechism-a-recipe-for-managing-innovation-41511be748a

https://research.utdallas.edu/blog/nine-questions-to-a-focused-proposal

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Robert Seltzer的更多文章

  • Social Media Detox

    Social Media Detox

    I'm taking a break from social media, and this time, I'm not setting a return date. I've realized that across all my…

    2 条评论
  • Measuring Data Quality: Metrics and KPIs

    Measuring Data Quality: Metrics and KPIs

    (SemiIntelligent Newsletter Vol 3, Issue 32) This is my last newsletter, for now, on data and data quality and its…

    2 条评论
  • To Err is Human: Addressing Data Bias in AI Models

    To Err is Human: Addressing Data Bias in AI Models

    (SemiIntelligent Newsletter Vol 3, Issue 31) Data bias in AI models can lead to skewed results, unfair treatment, and…

    3 条评论
  • Data Augmentation Techniques for AI Training

    Data Augmentation Techniques for AI Training

    (SemiIntelligent Newsletter Vol 3, Issue 31) Training AI models with insufficient or low-quality data can lead to…

    1 条评论
  • The Ethics of Data Quality in AI

    The Ethics of Data Quality in AI

    (SemiIntelligent Newsletter Vol 3, Issue 30) The integrity of AI applications is fundamentally dependent on the quality…

  • Tools and Technologies for Data Quality Management

    Tools and Technologies for Data Quality Management

    (SemiIntelligent Newsletter, Vol 3, Issue 29) Managing and improving data quality is essential for the success of AI…

  • The Role of Human Oversight in AI Data Curation

    The Role of Human Oversight in AI Data Curation

    (SemiIntelligent Newsletter Vol 3, Issue 28) In the world of AI, data is the bedrock upon which algorithms build their…

    1 条评论
  • Case Studies: Overcoming Data Quality Challenges

    Case Studies: Overcoming Data Quality Challenges

    (SemiIntelligent Newsletter, Vol 3, Issue 27) Data quality is a critical factor in the success of AI projects. Poor…

  • The Impact of Incomplete Data on AI Models

    The Impact of Incomplete Data on AI Models

    (SemiIntelligent Newsletter Vol 3, Issue 26) Incomplete data is a common issue that can severely undermine the…

  • Strategies for Ensuring Data Accuracy in AI Datasets

    Strategies for Ensuring Data Accuracy in AI Datasets

    (SemiIntelligent Newsletter Vol 3 Issue 25) I am continuing the data theme in the newsletter. I am also striving to…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了