The Wellness Gender Surcharge

Multivitamins, our daily well-being companions, sometimes carry more than just nutrients – they harbor subtle gender stereotypes. Think pink, flowery bottles labeled "beauty" or “metabolism-boosting” for women and robust, metallic containers shouting "strength" for men. These assumptions not only reinforce societal expectations but they oversimplify diverse health needs. The marketing spectacle doesn't end there; it affects pricing too. Essentially identical formulations, differing only in gendered packaging, often cost more for women, reminding us that wellness sometimes comes with a gender surcharge.

Check out how researcher Brittany Melton characterizes vitamin marketing as a disparity in emphasis, sometimes depicting men as 'professional' and women as 'decorative.'

Question of the Week:

Other than the supplement aisle, where have you observed a “pink tax,” a markup on goods and services marketed to women and for which men pay less for similar products and services? We’ll go first. Did you know some states have a different kind of “pink tax?” The pink tax refers to the sales tax on menstrual products like tampons and pads. While considered essential for many women, some states label them as a luxury, imposing sales tax, unlike groceries and medicine, which are exempt.

Want more insights like this? Subscribe to Radicle Journal and keep up with the latest at Radicle Science.