Weekly Links: The SECURE Act Provides Greater Access to Multiple Employer Plans
The Weekly Links Newsletter Logo

Weekly Links: The SECURE Act Provides Greater Access to Multiple Employer Plans

While multiple employer plans (MEPs) were in existence prior to the passage of the SECURE Act, small business will now have greater access to such plans. A MEP is a plan maintained by two or more unrelated employers. These plans allow employers to form a pooled 401(k) retirement plan, but still have separate accounts for each adopting employer, with different plan designs for each employer. By doing so, businesses can provide retirement plans with lower costs by utilizing the same administrative structure. Furthermore, these plans require a lesser compliance burden than if each employer offered the plan separately.

Prior to the SECURE Act, the Department of Labor (DOL) required plans be tied together by “genuine economic or representative interests.” This generally meant that employers must have a prior connection, such as membership in the same association. In addition, these plans were further burdened by separate nondiscrimination testing, and if one company’s plan failed to meet this testing criteria, the whole plan could be disqualified — often called the “one bad apple” rule. Because of these burdens, MEPs are fairly uncommon these days.

With the passage of the SECURE Act, employers are now allowed to enroll in “open” MEPs for unrelated small businesses. Furthermore, the Act has repealed the “one bad apple” rule, no longer exposing the entire plan to disqualification for a single employer’s nondiscrimination violation. The loosening of these two rules should open the market for MEP 401(k) plans. While these loosened provisions are a benefit to employers, it should be noted that each employer still has the fiduciary responsibility to be prudent in deciding on whether to join a MEP.

The SECURE Act: a good start but far more is needed from The Brookings Institution

Recommended Reading

Get There Itis

We’ve all been there. Are plans are laid out, and we’re all set to take off. But then something happens. It could be weather, or it could be something more personal. Nonetheless, it can veer us off path; or stop us entirely. Not ones to give up, we push forward, ignoring the signs. Then, the foreseeable happens. That even gets in our way and causing more harm than if we decided to adapt to new conditions. As Carolyn of The Financial Bodyguard write, this plan continuation bias can be live or death. She goes on to tie this to our financial life and suggests some ways to prevent this bias.

Got a Raise? It’s Time to Bump Up Your Savings, Too

You’ve gotten a raise and now comes time to increase your savings. But, as usual, you end up spending that extra income. You’re not alone, many workers do the same. It even has a name, “lifestyle creep.” It’s the process of increasing the cost of your lifestyle in step with the increase in your income. Paradoxically, when you get a raise, you should actually increase your savings rate. Which helps ensure you’ll have enough to afford the same lifestyle in retirement. As Ann Carrns writes for The New York Times, “Each time you get a raise, spend a percentage of it that’s twice the number of years to retirement — and save the rest. “

Visualizing Unequal State Tax Burdens Across America

Taxes are one of the biggest expenses we all incur. While states vary with the amount, they tax, we all pay some level of tax. Whether that’s state income tax, property taxes, payroll taxes, or the like. But what does the effective tax rate look like across income brackets? As Jenna Ross of the Visual Capitalist shows some states are more equitable than others, with Washington coming in first (or worst). While the effective tax rate of the top 1% was just 3%, the effective tax rate of the bottom 20% is an astonishing 17.8%! Which means the ETR of the bottom 20% is 6x higher than that of the top 1%.

Virtual Financial Advisor: Next Big Thing or Expensive Fad?

Nowadays you can buy virtually anything online. You can buy groceries, toiletries, furniture, legal advice, even homes! So why should financial advice be any different? In the digital age it makes sense that more advisors are turning to the virtual world to service clients. But what about those advisors whose whole business is virtually based? Patrick Brewer over at Model FA discusses 5 reasons why he believes this digital model is just an expensive fad.        


Anne Liebgott ? Founder

AW?SWITZERLAND ? AW●ASIA PACIFIC | MIDDLE EAST ? Directories of wealth management, private banking, and other services for US, Canadian, and Latin American clients ? americanswelcome.swiss ? americanswelcome.asia

4 年

Interesting changes!

Ryan Lane, CPA

Associate Manager at QuidelOrtho | Board Member at Flower City Tissue Mills | Simon MBA Candidate

4 年

Carolyn Gowen Patrick Brewer, CFA, CPA

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了