Weather Modification

Weather Modification

I find the contradictory aspect of any subject to be worthy of investigation and such is the case with weather modification. In this case, 'the media' appears to be more confused than the public on this subject as you can see from the above image that appeared on Monday, 21 October, 2024.

Real Data?

From the "Proceedings of 3rd International Conference CND GS’2022" by Ukraine-based Olena SHEVCHENKO, Kira HORIACHEVA:

"The (1966) National Academy of Sciences report, for example, says: "In a sense, weather modification today is a reality. Man can and does interfere with the atmosphere in a number of ways. His ability to produce deliberate beneficial changes is still very limited and uncertain, but it is no longer economically or politically trivial.""

The report mentioned can also be found here...

...and here:

3rd Party Research?

This is from the ScienceDirect article "Knowledge for a warmer world: A patent analysis of climate change adaptation technologies" by Kerstin H?tte and Su Jung Jee:

"While not judging about the complementarity of mitigation and adaptation in general, our results suggest how policymakers can harness these technological synergies to achieve both goals simultaneously."

History of Weather Modification Patents?

This image is from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365216760_Application_of_Technologies_for_Influencing_the_Weather_in_Contempoprary_Geopolitical_Situation

Yes, weather modification has a long history, but decide for yourself if this is really being done, and remember, patent lists alone, such as Sirius Report's "List of 100 US Patents Related to Weather Modification", or a search through the large media outlets will not be enough to make a logical decision, as you can see from above they may only lead to more confusion.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Engine EcoPhils, Inc.的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了