Weak Leadership 101
“Victory often leads to blind spots.” – Unknown
By now, everyone knows the story of Theranos.
It’s been the subject of countless news feeds, a breathless legal saga, and even a Netflix miniseries.
In a nutshell, Elizabeth Holmes (the founder of Theranos) captivated investors, the media, and even major retail chains like Walgreens with a promise: blood testing that could detect hundreds of conditions with just a finger prick. Investors poured in hundreds of millions. The company soared to a $9 billion valuation, and Holmes was hailed as the next Steve Jobs.
But what was REALLY going on? Theranos never had the technology it claimed. Instead of basing their confidence on solid data and testing, leaders and investors alike saw the staggering valuation, the media buzz, and the industry hype as signs of “success.” The process behind their decisions? Ignored. As long as outcomes looked good on paper, they didn’t question the integrity of the work behind them.
While the leadership at Theranos was toxic, one has to call out the leaders and investors who enabled that toxicity. The hype was generated by THEIR support. The big lie was perpetuated by THEIR lack of due diligence. They were weak leaders.
Weak Leadership Is Far Too Common
But this wasn’t a one-time failure. We can generate a long list of examples where leaders failed their stakeholders, including:
Which begs the question why? Why are there soooooo many cautionary tales of weak leaders who enabled dysfunction?
As I mentioned in my last newsletter, I see the sin of resulting as a MAJOR root cause. Resulting is when we judge decisions solely by their outcomes, not by the quality of the decision-making process itself. It’s the belief that if something worked out, the decision was solid, and if it failed, the decision was flawed. But that kind of thinking? It’s a trap.
And here’s the bigger problem: most leaders don’t realize they’re guilty of resulting.
Why Do Leaders Keep Resulting?
Leaders today are under immense pressure. But why do they keep falling into the trap of resulting? It comes down to five core reasons:
When you combine these five factors, you get leaders who are constantly chasing outcomes. They don’t stop to question the path they took to get there. And the cost of that? It’s high. Because when you’re only focused on results, you’re trapped in a reactive cycle—constantly scrambling to catch up with the next win, ignoring the quality of the decision-making process that truly defines long-term success.
The Ego-Fear Loop: Resulting’s Silent Partner
So what happens when leaders make decisions based only on outcomes? They enter what I call the “ego-fear loop” - a self-destructive cycle that stunts growth and limits potential.
Imagine this: a leader lands a major win. Their ego inflates, and they start believing they’ve got the magic touch. They get used to the praise and admiration that comes with success, so they start fearing failure. This fear triggers the ego again, and they double down on the same approaches to keep the “winning” streak going.
The ego-fear loop distorts their core drives:
In the end, they’re not leading with clarity and empowerment… they’re leading to protect their own egos.
Resulting fuels this loop by feeding into those fears. When leaders judge solely by outcomes, they’re constantly reacting, trying to replicate past wins or avoid past failures without really understanding the mechanics behind either. This reactive approach doesn’t just impact the leader - it seeps into team dynamics, strategy, and even the company’s culture.
领英推荐
This is the very defintion of weak leadership.
Breaking Free from Resulting and the Ego-Fear Loop
Leaders can escape the resulting trap by shifting focus from outcomes to quality decision-making. That means slowing down, analyzing decisions irrespective of outcomes, and encouraging their teams to dig deeper into what worked and what didn’t. Ultimately, it means that leaders will see the responsibility of creating a great decision-making environment as CORE to their roles.
But for this to happen, leaders must break free from the ego-fear loop. They must realign their drives. They need to value competence over success, emphasizing growth and learning, not just outcomes. They need to focus on building genuine relationships rather than chasing significance and recognition. And they need to cultivate autonomy over control by embracing risk—not running from it.
Let’s face it: the pressure to deliver results will never go away. But if we want sustainable success, we need to shift how we define “winning.”
High-performance leadership comes not from chasing wins but from learning how to win better.
Holomua. Onward and upward.
An extra thought:
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
~ Winston Churchill
In case you missed it…
Does Your Leadership Have THIS Cancer?: https://youtu.be/8XVsmWQbFo0
A fascinating breakdown of change strategies from Jennifer George : https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/jennegeorge_changecommunications-communications-leadership-activity-7256806692724645890-2tMB?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
Are you suffering from the BIGGEST leadership blindspot? See for yourself at https://youtu.be/bkjgB4-nbAA
Here’s what I have been consuming…
An interview with former Google X Chief Business Officer Mo Gawdat that EVERYONE should hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxVNR0Om-lA
Why Are Workers So Sad? https://www.fastcompany.com/91087395/why-are-workers-so-sad-these-researchers-offer-clues-and-recommendations
A US political insight we should ALL know (it's non-partisan, I promise): https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/red-blue-mirage-election-night-vote-counts-make-hard-tell-will-win-rcna175475
When you are ready, here are a few ways for us to continue your journey together.
In a world of empty suits, I’m leading a movement of authenticity, integrity, and trust inside the sales profession
4 个月The first time I heard the word "resulting" was from you Tim Ohai so freaking good.