We Need To Talk About Race
Image by: Paul Ayre

We Need To Talk About Race

For the last 12 months I have been publishing regular articles on racial inequities in the arts with the aim of driving more open conversations about racial bias, its causes and practical solutions. While engagement with the articles is high, there is hesitancy among all demographics when it comes to sharing opinions publicly. More than 50% of responses I receive have come via direct messages rather than publicly shared comments.

When asked, people gave a variety of reasons for choosing not to share their views publicly. These include issues of privacy, employer constraints (such as working for a public broadcaster), not wishing to appear ill-informed and a belief that as a white leader you should leave the conversation about solutions to racial equity to people with ‘lived experience’. Each of these reasons – and there are more – would merit an article on its own. In this piece, I focus on what I think is the biggest barrier to participation: political correctness.

The readers of my articles – who include senior leaders, managers and administrators in the arts – often have strong, interesting and important perspectives. However, when asked, people from all communities say they are uncomfortable sharing their opinions because they are fearful of saying the wrong thing and being judged.


Fear of saying the wrong thing

Conversations on race generate emotion. They can ‘trigger’ people and opinions can be received with judgement. They can become a minefield of political correctness. When sharing views on the extent of racism, its causes and how it might be solved, you risk causing deep offence if your opinions are deemed to be insufficient (not radical enough) or inappropriate. Online, this can lead to personal attacks which can quickly be amplified, ending in condemnation and a risk to professional reputation.

The term ‘racist’ is one of the most unacceptable labels in our society. No one will publicly admit to being racist; not even supporters of far-right political parties, much less more left-leaning communities in the arts. Any potential accusation sparks fear to the heart, making open debate more difficult.

The severe and multiple impacts of racial injustice make negative reactions natural. But if our goal is to end racism, we must question the extent to which public shaming helps us – or not. Racial prejudice can’t be ended without forensic diagnosis of the problem. To achieve this, open conversations are critical. The more people engage, the better our collective understanding of the problem and the more effective the solutions become.

There absolutely needs to be room for challenge, but challenge that is constructive. This is harder to do when tensions are high. To take some heat out of these conversations and shed more light on the extent of racism, it’s important to find a new and more socially acceptable definition of the term ‘racist’. One that people don’t necessarily feel proud of but can at least ascribe to, with regret but not shame.

De-weaponising the word 'racist'

Ibram X Kendi’s work on anti-racism helps with this. He contends that there’s no neutral position on racism: if you are not pro-actively ‘anti-racist’ then you are racist. He defines racism as any idea which suggests that Black communities are responsible for the systemic disadvantages we experience. What’s interesting is that, for Kendi, although holding such views is highly problematic it is not sufficient cause for writing someone off.

He understands that this thinking is itself a product of systemic racism and that we are all subject to it. Black, white, left wing or right wing. Racism in his world has no colour or political affiliation. He freely admits to having held racist opinions himself and says the same of some of his heroes like Frederick Douglass and Barack Obama. So, for him, racism should not be used pejoratively, but simply as a descriptor of a way of thinking.

In conversations about race, the reaction to anything deemed ill-informed or politically incorrect is often criticism in which racial prejudice is either inferred or implied. Any accusation or suspicion of racism is toxic so many prefer to remain silent or express their views in a safe space rather than running the gauntlet of sharing their opinions publicly. Kendi’s widening of the definition makes racism more ubiquitous so it’s harder to judge others as most of us are likely to have been guilty of racism at some point in our lives.

Power and responsibility still matter

None of this lets the predominantly white leadership of our sector off the hook. In fact, it may create the space to better hold them to account. While in Kendi’s view we are all likely to be guilty of racist thinking, ultimately it is still those in power that have most responsibility to change things. Using his approach, we can de-weaponise the word ‘racist’ and reduce its emotional impact in conversations.

With a less polarising definition we are free to name racism where we see it without the shame and possible consequences that come with it. We can avoid the emotion that prevents us from fully focusing on the job in hand, gain a better understanding of this pernicious problem and move towards the implementation of solutions.

This won’t be easy: it will require patience by some, bravery by others and goodwill by all. We are all gatekeepers in these conversations. Let’s begin, one conversation at a time, starting here!

I’d love to know what you think - leave a reaction or comment in the thread.?

Emily Brearley PhD

Development Economist solution42.org

2 年

Thank you Kevin. I spoke about this last year with several aid agencies—which a still very much in a neo-colonial mindset…only mentioning as you asked me to comment but I have not worked in corporate America so I can’t comment there ????

回复
Julian Walker

Writer and trainer/facilitator, fighting racism through critical examination of whiteness

2 年

In my anti-racism work I like to admit "of course I'm racist - how could I not be, having been socialised in a system of white supremacy?" We are all swimming in this sea and wil have internalised some of the false messages we receive, whether that's about superiority or inferiority of ourselves and people who look like us.

回复

It takes me a couple of hours to read and respond to these comments. I'm always slow to do it because of the busy day to day, but I never regret investing the time when I eventually get?here. There are a super interesting set of comments in this thread; some I agree with, some I disagree with, some I don't fully understand, but all (especially given the 'call to action' in this article) are much appreciated.

Eddy Canfor-Dumas

Co-founder and Director at The Centre for Creative Conversation

3 年

I think it would be extremely helpful to this issue to move beyond the language of 'race' – which derives from debunked 19th century concepts of how to classify (and rank) human groups – and have conversations about how to counter prejudice and discrimination in personal, cultural and structural terms.

Kris Putnam-Walkerly

Strategic Advisor to Philanthropists & Foundation CEOs | I help ultra-high-net-worth donors and foundation leaders increase the clarity, impact, and joy of their giving.

3 年

Thank you so much Kevin Osborne for writing and sharing this important article. I think you've hit it right on the head. Fear of being shamed is highly prevalent in the field of philanthropy, which is the field I consult and advise in. Most of my clients - white and BIPOC CEOs and donors - genuinely want to advance racial equity and racial justice in their philanthropy, aren't quite sure how to do it, and fear doing/saying the wrong thing, or in the wrong order. In my experience, foundation board members (who tend to be more predominately white, male, and less engaged in the real work of the foundation and the communities they serve) are even less likely to want to discuss race, their racism, how philanthropy perpetuates racism, or what they should be doing differently. On one hand, I read articles like this one from Vu Le (esp his point #3) and I agree with him and am hugely appreciative that he writes and shares these critiques https://nonprofitaf.com/2021/10/10-predictable-responses-from-white-dudes-when-people-criticize-inequitable-systems/ On the other hand, I also believe that when we feel shame (which basically means you feel "I am bad") and make decisions from a place of shame, we create more shame. And that isn't very helpful. Thank you again for all you are doing to share your ideas and encourage discussion!!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kevin Osborne的更多文章

  • Where I sit on white middle class activism

    Where I sit on white middle class activism

    I have combined my two articles into one document because I think the first gives important context for the second -…

    9 条评论
  • My uncomfortable stance on climate change and racial equity

    My uncomfortable stance on climate change and racial equity

    Edit: upon reflection, a previous article I wrote on "A journey from shame to activism" provides crucial context to the…

    23 条评论
  • A journey from shame to activism

    A journey from shame to activism

    Edit: My latest article "My uncomfortable stance on climate change and racial equity" is now linked to this one via a…

    51 条评论
  • Is money a help or hindrance in fulfilling potential?

    Is money a help or hindrance in fulfilling potential?

    While not making me rich, my early career in the music industry gave me sufficient wealth to be able to take several…

    33 条评论
  • Championing Racial Equality

    Championing Racial Equality

    Growing up, I experienced how the foundations for human potential can be eroded and, in some cases, crushed. These…

    22 条评论
  • Diversity data: colour or ethnicity?

    Diversity data: colour or ethnicity?

    Arts Council England (ACE)’s new National Portfolio investment 2023-26 will increase funding to racially diverse-led…

    73 条评论
  • The arts divided cannot stand

    The arts divided cannot stand

    The UK’s growing Black, Asian and minority ethnic population* inevitably means that the racial funding gap** in the…

    47 条评论
  • Responses to ACE National Portfolio funding expose systemic racism

    Responses to ACE National Portfolio funding expose systemic racism

    It appears Arts Council England (ACE) has achieved a significant improvement in the proportion of its funding going to…

    79 条评论
  • I don’t hate the Arts Council

    I don’t hate the Arts Council

    Through almost monthly blogs, articles and talks on social media over the last two years, I have sought to highlight…

    12 条评论
  • Cost-of-living crisis: how will it impact diversity in the arts?

    Cost-of-living crisis: how will it impact diversity in the arts?

    A few weeks ago, I read an article on the crisis facing the arts which prompted me to think about what it might mean…

    9 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了