We need to figure out what America stands for in the 21st century — and have a foreign policy that reflects it
JOHANNES EISELE / Getty Images

We need to figure out what America stands for in the 21st century — and have a foreign policy that reflects it

In this series, professionals provide advice for the next U.S. president. What do you want POTUS focused on? Write your own #nextpresident post here.

Dear Mister/Madame President, 

The world faces no shortage of crises. Europe is fracturing. The Middle East is burning. China’s economy is slowing and other emerging markets are in various stages of political and economic trouble. Low oil prices are producing panic in petro-states around the world. How you deal with the challenges these problems will create will determine much of your presidential legacy. Let me offer you a bit of advice.  

Start with the big picture first. We now live in a G-Zero world, one in which no one country is willing to do the heavy-lifting in response to the world’s growing number of problems. U.S. foreign policy influence is now on the decline, in part because taxpayers are tired of sending troops and money overseas to fight wars with no clear benefits for U.S. security or prosperity. That’s not going to change any time soon. In a perfect world, I’d tell you to be ambitious, to swing for the fences. But we don’t live in a perfect world, and bold action in today’s global environment—no matter how noble your intentions—may well provoke more problems than they solve.

This doesn’t mean the U.S. should simply retreat, but you’ll need to come up with a real, comprehensive vision of what America’s role in the world should be and align your foreign policy with that. Set priorities and stick to them. Your predecessors George W. Bush and Barack Obama had very different sets of foreign policy strengths and weaknesses, but they both lacked an overarching vision and too often seemed to be improvising. Just look to the Middle East to see how well that worked out. It’s no longer enough to have a great tool kit and a few smart ideas. We need to finally figure out what America stands for in the 21st century, and we need a foreign policy that reflects that, one that sets priorities and sticks to them. That starts with you.

As to specific policy proposals, I have a few. Latin America has been one of the America’s few foreign policy bright spots over the past couple of years. This is a testament to America’s strategic patience, a willingness to wait for the right political openings and then to go in big. We’ve seen this with both Cuba and Argentina in the Obama era. Recent political developments in Brazil and economic developments in Venezuela tell us that similar openings are coming in those countries. The Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal will get wrapped up this year, and you should aim to expand the agreement beyond Mexico, Chile, and Peru to the rest of Latin America, cementing a multilateral system of standards, diplomacy and intelligence that others can join; Brazil will be critical for this.

A few more ideas. Start paying attention to the impact of technology on politics and society—the changes it will bring will be faster and more destabilizing than anything we’ve seen before. That means that you’ll have to start engaging with many more non-state actors, including mayors, CEOs, NGOs, tech visionaries and key public influencers. States are no longer the only movers and shakers in the world, for better and for worse. Ignore them at your own peril.

When it comes to the Middle East, stay as far away as you can—easier said than done, of course. You also need to be there for America’s allies in Asia. Asia, the most economically dynamic and geopolitically complicated region in the world, will be critical to America’s foreign policy future. And don’t forget about Europe, Germany first and foremost (sorry UK). Angela Merkel will need all the help she can get keeping the EU together and afloat, especially as the refugee crisis rages on. She’s probably not going to get that support from her fellow European leaders, who will be dealing with swelling nationalist and anti-EU sentiment in their own countries. The United States can make a real difference here, and a strong Europe is very much in America’s long-term interests, even if the trans-Atlantic partnership is not as strong as it once was.

It’s true that America is no longer the world’s policeman, but if you play it smart, it can be a model for how free, democratic and prosperous countries should act in our 21st-century global order. That’s a goal worthy of a U.S. president.

More posts on this topic:

Evan Nibbe

Junior at University of Texas at Dallas in Computer Science

8 年

Our best bet in terms of what America stands for is making the UN a representative democracy based on the population of each country, where their funding is chosen by the heads of each country from those heads' own tax base. And that UN laws will only be supreme in any area that is in a state of anarchy. We could also get rid of the colonial empire that is the EU, and exchange that for more NATO, we could also make ourselves more democratic by passing some (not "common sense), but smart, laws and amendments: see: https://www.change.org/p/senate-and-house-increase-participation-in-the-u-s-government

回复

Ian is spot on. Lead by example and push our ideas to the forefront and stick to them. Then see who follows building workable coalitions from there.

WILLIAM GIBSON

owner operator at StopS sECRETs CONSULTING CATERING RESTAURANTS HOTELS FRONT OF THE HOUSE BACK OF THE HOUSE BAR HEALTH

8 年

facebook icon Facebook twitter icon Twitter WILLIAM GIBSON WILLIAM GIBSON owner operator at StopS sECRETs CONSULTING CATERING RESTAURANTS HOTELS FRONT OF THE HOUSE BACK OF THE HOUSE BAR HEALTH Edit postView stats Who needs Government for anything? Apr 8, 20160 views 0 Likes 0 Comments Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Can anyone tell me what the point of Government is for? If you say to provide the answer to provide for the people services ? I laugh ,Government can't compete in any field ! Am I an anarchist ? No too many rules I say! Lets just take health education welfare .If we take the money from these huge "systems we can pay every man woman and child in America $70,000.oo EACH ! Then if we stop going to war to help dictator we have more to give to each American.Then if we stop aid to dictatorships we have more.Just divide 300 million into the 5 trillion GNP .And you see what we should get every year .THEN WE SELL OFF ALL THE PROPERTY HELD BY GOVERNMENT oh my !The bottom line this is not TREASON or SEDITION it is a STOCK CONCIDERATION regarding the UNITED STATES OF GOVERNMENT INC. WILLIAM GIBSON Written by WILLIAM GIBSON

回复
rudy lee

Independent Consumer Services Professional

8 年

I knew this in the beginning. But we became too over confident in our abilities, unwilling to come to terms with these realities, so we have to rely on technologies to fix something that may take a long time to remedy...if it wants to be fixed.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了