Are We Having Fun Yet?

Are We Having Fun Yet?

Welcome to a new series I'm starting to get to the root of this question.

For myself and millions and millions of other people living in the US, the past several decades brought incredible advances. Daily tasks like paying bills and depositing checks went from taking hours to taking seconds. We can connect with people around the world in an instant, and talk to them face-to-face through a device we can take anywhere. Diverse, high-quality media became incredibly accessible to consume, as well as to create. And these advances go beyond the frivolous - many medical conditions went from being death sentences to being survivable, many physical differences became less disabling, and civil liberties for many expanded (current threats notwithstanding). More than ever, it can feel like we’re living in a truly modern era, although modernity is a deeply problematic concept.*

Despite progress, there is a strong sense that our mental health and wellbeing is declining. Surveys and other data sources find that rates of depression are increasing across the population, as are deaths from causes related to psychological distress, such as suicide. This has reached such a point that the Biden Administration declared that the U.S. is facing a mental health crisis.

But how could this be? How can we observe such profound suffering amidst such incredible growth and progress? This becomes existentially troubling for our society: if we’re not better off, what is all of this for? When we ask ourselves, as the catch phrase from the cult classic television show Party Down goes, “Are we having fun yet?” the answer should be yes. Is it just that the fruits of this modernity are not equitably distributed? Or is it that those experiencing the sensation of modernity are actually worse off? Or both??

The literature points us in all of these directions. For example, research identifies how growing socioeconomic inequities in recent years have left millions behind, leading to widespread experiences of despair and hopelessness. Other research identifies how new technologies, such as social media, impact our development and daily life, leading to greater loneliness and lower self-esteem. Both of these processes may interact to produce emergent phenomena, such as increasing political polarization, which can bring racism, misogyny, and nativism to the fore, and further impact population mental health.

The literature is also not very conclusive. These theories, and many more, are certainly compelling, and there is some empirical evidence to suggest that they might be true. What we don’t have much evidence about though is which, among the many potential root causes, principally contributed to the decline in wellbeing. It could be, for example, that all three of the theorized causes above contributed, but most of the effect could be explained by another cause, such as changing practices related to family formation and cohabitation.

This lack of certainty puts us in a difficult policy position. If we are facing a crisis of mental health and wellbeing, we need policymakers to act on the upstream root causes. If they don’t, the processes will continue, mental health will further decline, and we will have to rely on increasingly incredible quantities of mental health services to address the population-level distress. The underlying causes may even intensify and exacerbate the crisis, which could spread as other countries follow our developmental trajectory.?

To act on root causes, though, policymakers may need to implement fairly profound policy changes, which may disrupt what we have come to accept as our modern world. Thinking of the theories explored above, this could involve deep redistribution of socioeconomic opportunities, novel regulatory regimes for developing technologies, or national programs to promote social cohesion and solidarity. To ask for the magnitude of policy change likely required, we should be certain that (1) there really is an issue, (2) we have identified its cause(s), and (3) that the intervention we propose will in fact address it.

This series will seek to contribute to answering those three questions, over the course of four sections:

  • Is wellbeing really declining and, if so, for whom?
  • What do we know about the potential root causes of this decline?
  • What specifically were the principal drivers of the decline?
  • How can we address the principal drivers?

Ultimately, this series will contribute toward understanding how we, as a society in this present moment, are doing mentally and emotionally, and provide some steps to deliver on the promise of societal progress that advances mental health and wellbeing equitably for everyone.

What do you think is needed to take on the root causes of the mental health crisis in the US? Any early theories about what the root causes may be? Leave your thoughts and comments below!

*Concepts like “modern” and “modernity” are an issue for a number of reasons: it wrongly (or at least over-simplistically) characterizes history as a march of progress toward the present era; it reinforces oppressive and colonial ideas of progress, disparaging peoples that would not be considered “modern;” and lacks clarity and precision that is helpful in understanding the history of our species.

Love this! Thank you for taking this on! I believe that if we start REALLY upstream addressing social determinants and equity - across sectors - we will make progress with population mental health. But we won't see big changes until the next generation. Slow and steady wins the race. Problem will be finding the will to these investments in science, practice and policy without more immediate pay-off. Look forward to reading more of your thoughts.

回复
Dave Cortright ??

Professional coach, mental health advocate, and effective altruist. Passionate about helping ameliorate the global mental health crisis.

1 年

Hi Nathaniel, I appreciate your data-driven approach and pragmatism in your writing. This is likely an oversimplification, but in all my research I've found the biggest factor in mental health (and physical health!) outcomes is close relationships. This was the major finding of the Harvard Grant study, and I used it to derive Grant’s Razor: “The only thing that truly matters in life are your relationships: with others, but also with yourself.” https://designingthislife.medium.com/grants-razor-the-only-thing-that-truly-matters-in-life-are-your-relationships-569187fe7c52 I'd be happy to chat with you further about the root causes and possible solutions to our current mental health crisis if you're interested. DM me: https://designingthis.life/

Andrew Frawley

Movements, Policy, and Politics for the Future of Mental Health

1 年

Hi Nathaniel Counts - I was sent your work by a friend (Carlos A. Larrauri, MSN) and love this exploration! My organization The Good Life Movement wrote a white paper exploring a lot of this at our founding (and is ultimately trying to solve it). By no means do I think the paper is wholly conclusive, but it outlines several theories with data. Happy to send it but definitely excited to follow along.

Charlene C.

Operations Director at UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine

1 年

Also really looking forward to following along! Love how clear and concise your writing is

回复
Vinu Ilakkuvan, DrPH

Partnering with communities to transform health through policy and systems change

1 年

Nathaniel, I'm excited to follow along for your thoughts on this! As for my early theories, a combination of things - I would echo the points Julie Erickson, MURP made below (ideas that more is better, perception more important than reality, productivity is everything, and "pulling yourself up by your boot straps" more admirable than asking for help) and also the ones you alluded to (socioeconomic inequities, social media/phones, political polarization, family formation/cohabitation). This interview (https://hbr.org/2023/09/harvards-arthur-c-brooks-on-the-secrets-to-happiness-at-work) has been on my mind lately (I just wrote about it this morning - https://deft-artisan-226.ck.page/posts/how-to-keep-people-engaged-in-community-health-improvement-efforts). He points to 4 key elements to having a happy life (I might take issue with the term "happy" but can be replaced with content/satisfying/etc.): 1. faith/philosophy (doesn't have to be religious, but something that provides a sense of perspective on the "smallness" of your own life/world); 2. family relationships; 3. real friendships; 4. work, namely earned success + serving other people. I think the ideas Julie mentioned + issues that you raised impact these 4 things.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了