The world does not need action, but responsibility

You reap what you sow: The whole world is about to go under, but in praxis most is turning their back on the solutions.

Though it is very popular in some regions to exchange bottle deposit for forests in the bottle vending machine in the supermarket, or to buy CO2 quotas in connection with travelling. We need completely different buns on the soup, to transform climate friendliness into a culture that is edible globally. Because the solution only works when we all contribute.

You reap what you sow - it's so basic and simple as a headache - but without any obvious relief.

Black energy and living beyond means - depleting the resources available - is not posing the greatest danger to humanity. We fall victim for our own group psychology, antisocial behavior and general abdication of responsibility on the level of decisions, absolving us all from responsibility for our own actions when we destroy the living conditions.

For better - and worse

Terrestrial and marine ecosystems play an important role in?regulating climate. They currently absorb roughly half of man-made carbon emissions.

Cut in card board:

Biodiversity and ecosystem services actually help us to adapt to and mitigate?climate?change. Working with?nature therefore necessarily has to become a crucial part of our effort to combat?climate?change.

We choose opportunities and opt out of the problems created based on choices we make every single day.

The power of many is the force that both creates and opens up for the solution of crises.

What almost hurts the most is that not only we know what is wrong, but also actually knows what it takes to turn off the climates deterioration and restore good living conditions here on earth.

As things easily get even worse when we extend the short sighted linearity of the current market economy to the Third World.

It is very unfortunate that the world's problems only are in their infancy - honestly, we ain't seen nothing yet - in relation to the third world's potential climate impact, which can only be expected to go one way, and that's up.

Climate changes in the subtropical and tropical regions, with droughts, wildfires / slash and burn agriculture and the development of huge agricultural monocultures to meet the world's need for affordable bio fuel and palm oil, are forcing the land off farmers' hands and intensifying migration from country to the city.

Combined with Sino-African, Oriental and Arctic expansionary economic policies, we will see an ever-increasing climate impact from the third world, and there is very little we actually can do about it.

We need to focus on developing production in just so many ways, and do so in ways that without putting too much strain on the environment, destroy agricultural land or deplete unrenewable resources such as phosphorus and water.

In reality, it will be completely impossible to avoid many of the current problems, but it is important that we work purposefully to reduce their scale.

The economic and redistributive aspects play a crucial role - market supply-demand and political issues is also necessary to attentend to facilitate food supply on the brim of the markets. By short, if many people are too poor to afford buying food, there will be serious hunger problems, no matter how much food we may produce under any circumstances.

The hard question is: How can we ensure the agricultural development are able to meet the demand to supply affordable plentiful food to an exponentially growing world population?

There is no simple answers to this question. It is though crucial to target the development of agricultural production at all levels, both around local and global issues to ensure the supply is plentiful enough to continue to meet the demand.

It is a well known fact that to feed everybody we need to double the world's total crop production by 2050, and this is an overwhelming demand.

To achieve this goal, we must facilitate an annual increase in crop production of approx. 2%. and a few percent annually may reasonable by first, but it must happen in a geo-ecological reality where the production of crops is limited by the declining availability of suitable agricultural land, water and fertilizers, and under conditions of faulting precipitation due to climatic changes.

With a more extensive production, restrictions are also introduced in the biological possibilities that lie in the cultivated crops, their interaction with the environment in which they are grown, and interaction with diseases, pests and weeds.?

As well as demographic factors will pose an increasingly problem for the demand for growth in crop production because the production is under pressure from many other factors, as e.g.:?Inclusion of agricultural land for the development of cities, industry, roads etc. Climate change, which worsens growing conditions in many parts of the world. Increased demand for crops for other purposes, especially for bioenergy. Increasing competition for the limited water resources. Destruction of agricultural land by erosion, salinisation and desertification.

Lack of arable land that can be included for cultivation.?As well of the fact that where new areas can be included, it is often connected with very high costs in the form of loss of natural values, biodiversity and living spaces of indigenous people.

Immediately it seems a frightening situation to look forward to, but here we will question whether the problem is in fact so unmanageable in reality.

If we are to avoid these problems of hunger - and to prevent that the environmental destruction becoming too severe, the message here is that we can not just always expect the market mechanisms to solve the problem by pulling up food production, when ever there is a shortage of food on the market, as poverty is the root cause to much food shortage not lack of supply options.

When we consider whether - or how - to feed e.g. 9 billion people on earth, it is equally important to keep in mind that we already grow enough crops today to easily feed 9 billion people. But fall short because of losses in all areas from field - through the consumer market - to kitchen.

A crucial factor is that instead of using the crops for human consumption, we use many of them as feed for our livestock. Of course, animal husbandry also leads to food production, but a much smaller amount of food is then available than the amount of feed consumed.

To put it another way: We can easily feed 9 billion people, but it will be difficult to feed them meat.

The point is, that we have a food system where in principle enough food already is grown, at a really lacking efficiency. We produce far more kilojoules of energy in the form of crops in the fields than are actually eaten as food, and livestock production is just one of several important reasons for this low efficiency.

Basically this means that when we are becoming in prospect of demanding twice as much food for a larger and more prosperous population in the world, it does not necessarily mean that we are indulged to harvest twice as much in the fields.

The vulnerability in food supply is not related to single regions, but connected by climate problems, politics and market developments across the global horizon.

Question should rather be: What does it take to eradicate hunger and food shortages globally while improving the environment, reducing carbon emissions and reenforce the water balance?

Knowing about how to adapt agricultural methods to a variety of different environments, balancing yields with conservation of biotopes is fundamental to succeed in breaking the vicious circles aggravating climate problems and put nature's autopilot back in action, and a fundamental to secure food supply everywhere and not limited to the most populated areas on earth like the Sahel region.

To achieve this, we must reinterpret the purpose of primary production, the dominant agricultural policies and subsidy schemes. It makes no sense to continue to create an incentive for agricultural practices that degrade the soil's fertility and reduce species richness globally.

Rather, there is a need for incentive schemes that support and reward farmers who use regenerative methods - that are actually possible to implement - and work in tandem with natural processes improving the environment.

It is a misconception that the industrialized world contributes to reducing world hunger - on the contrary, it is an essential part of the root cause to the whole problem.

A text book example - really - of how food consumption in one country depletes water resources in another, and inappropriate waste drastically worsens the climate such as salads, cabbage, corn and bananas and avocados in between South and North America, a relationship that also contributes significantly to driving an endless flow of refugees to the North.

That said, we must also keep in mind that living standards actually also are growing in many developing countries, and both population growth - and an increased prosperity here - are contributing to the growing demand for food.

This is simple market economy, increased prosperity leads to more demand because yet more people in the world can afford to bring enough food on the table, and at the same time many more people who have hitherto lived almost exclusively on plant products can afford to buy more animal foods.

It's a bunch of vicious circles, really..

The future has arrived, and it is is not depending on COP dialogues, but at what everyone of us does about it every day. The Fix is in your hands.

More recycling, greener diets, simple and natural strategies, respect for life, less Martian dreams and supporting natural solutions here on earth is the way forward for all earthlings...

Having the end of the line in sight, anyone can see what is needed are more circularity.

Products that dosn't have to be disposed after use, and reusable ingredients emerged from recycled production rather than new construction.

Imagine we recycled water space station style, we would then even not need waterworks.?

Basing energy consumption on tapping directly from the available solar, wind and geothermal sources, we could live happily without gas tanks and power plants.

All climate?models predicts that?Earth's?global average temperate will rise in the?future, but the amount of warming depends on the decisions we make about fossil fuel and the use of land.

However, decisions about how we make about fossil fuel and the use of land are already in our hands, we have sovereign control over both the prospect of climate development and improvements to the earth's climate in both the short and long term.

The fix take advantage of natural climate solutions?- conservation, restoration and improved land management actions that increases carbon storage in the soil - and of course avoid or delimit greenhouse gas emissions in landscapes and wetlands across?the?globe, because these solutions is addressing both desertification, the recurrent droughts and food shortages.

All of these problems that creates the climate crisis is overturn-able by changing the way we produce our food, and take advantages of energy.

A main key to unlocking many of the crises that threaten entire ecosystems with extinction, is hidden in dietary changes and of course the way we put food on the table.

Through diet, all the people of this planet have a unique influence on our common future. Diet choices not only affect health and world health, but actually World Health.

Greener diets based on more plant protein, less starch and empty carbs, more fruit nuts and less red meat, fewer things fried in oil and more things mixed in Neolithic fashion - if everyone does just that, every single day will bend and flatten the earth's dramatic curves more and pull all the unfortunate biological rhythms down into a healthy level again.

What applies to health also applies to Climate.

Phosphates and nitrogen, biodiversity and global warming and diet are two sides of the same coin.

There is no congruence between the capabilities of both known - yet undeveloped technologies - and the efforts required to improve the air quality and atmospheric composition.

Just as it is of no particular importance for the success rate whether we achieve 50- or 80% , 1,5 or 2,5 degrees of Celcius. The climate goals makes no sense if they are not followed up with the necessary changes in production and the way we live.

Problems is not solved by focusing on improving a handful of clean tech and green energy technologies - as this incentive in reality have just a vanishing effect on the climate changes.

The climate can only be improved if the way we cultivate the soil, use natural resources and affect the ecosystems changes radically and permanently.

The majority of the industrial farmed products is consumed in the industrial parts of the world primarily - and here a fair share of the production never reaches the market because of cosmetic reasons, and 20% of what goes on the market is even being dumped in landfills within the week.

Nine out of ten of the world's 570 million farms are managed by families, making the family farm the predominant form of agriculture, and consequently a potentially crucial agent of change in achieving sustainable food security and in eradicating hunger in the future.

To address the food crisis, putting support to family farmers first on the agricultural agenda is directing the primary effort where food supplies for the majority of the world population actually is produced.

Solutions that support natural restoration - especially locking up carbon, and maintain moist in soil is preferable in tandem with agricultural systems that build up soil fertility ground up, and introduction of ecological methods to sustain fertility is prefereable.

The reason is that life supporting natural cycles already has gone awreck - we need to remedy and take serious precautions to rescue remaining biotops to avoid further damage - and supply more affordable food - as we only farm arable land.

We can only do so by getting organized about how we rehabilitate and restore the natural processes in the long run and adapt the use of resources in a way that nature benefits from the intervention instead of getting deteriorated by the use.

And while we are at it, redevelop more rural areas to avoid attracting more poor population in supercities, as it is neither sustainable nor beneficial to have cities exceeding 30 million +, as this just replenish the water aquifers faster and leave so many more people surrounded by arid land with less food available.

If we are to avoid these problems of hunger - and to prevent that the environmental destruction becoming too severe, the message here is that we can not just always expect the market mechanisms to solve the problem by pulling up food production, when ever there is a shortage of food on the market, as poverty is the root cause to much food shortage not lack of supply options.

In perspective, the worst-affected areas are in sub-Saharan Africa, while Asia is home to the largest number of malnourished people. The Sahel region - home to more than a billion people - though, is so far capable of producing adequate amount food to meet the demands, but is under a constant threat of lack of rain fall - or to much precipitation in the wrong periods - worsening the food crisis locally, causing prices to increase subsequently in one of the most populated areas in the world, always on the brink of a humanitarian catastrophe due to exogenous climate change.

A significant part of the increase in food supply is orchestrated by market conditions outside the third world and is expected to be addressed by ordinary improvements such as:

Reducing losses in the consumer market - streamlining the supply chain from the crop in the field to food that actually is being eaten - in other words, making sure there will be more kilojoules for human nutrition for every kilojoule of crop we grow.

If developments in the markets show that it is actually becoming increasingly difficult to supply the world's population with the food in demand, the price can only be expected to rise - it's market economy 101 - as it will increase both efforts - and investments - in production and efficiency making the food systems more profitable in all stages of food production - at the same time the supply increases.

The bill for food shortage always end with the highest bidder, but the poorest pay the ultimate price.

Demand from the growing economies will continue to affect market prices causing a significant re-segmentation of consumption.

Price levels for livestock products raised on a high consumption of cereals and other crops will rise sharply in price.

In market terms consumption is expected to move towards more vegetables and less animal diets. But at a higher production level.

Other food groups that occupy large areas of cultivated land will also be relatively expensive, leading food production to be more competitive compared to other uses of agricultural land, e.g. it can be expected that it will be able to free up large areas which today are used to produce e.g. bioenergy.

In an even larger perspective, the crisis will open up opportunities for other crops that can be developed that are not even part of the food system we know today.

On the down side, probably the most important obstacle to immediately increase crop production here and now is the increasingly severe shortage of water.

Huge areas of the world today are cultivated with really low yields or simply cannot be cultivated at all due to lack of fresh water.

Ensuring food systems, under market conditions and conditional optimization, will boost security of supply will also expand the rural economy.

Farm sizes - that currently produce 80% of the worlds food - are becoming still smaller, and many smallholder farm households derive the bulk of their income from off-farm activities.

It is imperative to increase production per. workers, especially in low-income countries, to lift agricultural incomes and support a general expansion of rural economic welfare to prevent production losses when families eg. give up cultivating their shrinking lands due to declining incomes.

Time is up for agricultural policies and subsidy schemes that support and reward farmers who use regenerative methods, improve soil's fertility and uphold species richness globally.

To encourage family farmers to invest in sustainable agricultural practices authorities should seek to facilitate an enabling environment for innovation and start set things right again.

We no longer have environmental problems here on earth. The problem has become global. Cooler climate, fresh breathable air, affordable food supply, more arable land, improved public health, and enhanced biodiversity are all increasingly becoming a necessity.

What is needed are more circularity. Products that dosn't have to be disposed after use, and more ingredients emerged from recycled production rather than new construction.

Imagine we recycled water to the same degree as a space station, we would then even not need waterworks.?

Basing energy consumption on tapping directly from the available solar, wind and geothermal sources, we would not need gas tanks and power plants.

More recycling, greener diets, simple and natural strategies, respect for life, less Martian dreams and supporting natural solutions here on earth is the way forward for all earthlings...

A main key to unlocking many of the crises that threaten entire ecosystems with extinction, is hidden in dietary changes and of course the way we put food on the table.

Through diet, all the people of this planet have a unique influence on our common future. Diet choices not only affect health and world health, but actually World Health.

Greener diets based on more plant protein, less starch and empty carbs, more fruit nuts and less red meat, fewer things fried in oil and more things mixed in Neolithic fashion - if everyone does just that, every single day will bend and flatten the earth's dramatic curves more and pull all the unfortunate biological rhythms down into a healthy level again.

What applies to health also applies to climate.

Phosphates and nitrogen, biodiversity and global warming and diet are two sides of the same coin.

Think about that before the coral reefs are bleached out totally and the earth burned down, and the water level and the rain falls engulfs the land.

We suffocate ourselves in bad food - killing the earth, while the poorest die of hunger or suffer the drowning death.

To make a strategic effort, then everything we do has to pass the climate test. You may have heard that there are just a limited span of time to?save?the world from the climate crisis.

But chill, actually, there are no milestones and KPI’s after which the?planet?is going to tick ... and then explodes, and no point at which taking action becomes pointless.

It is never?too late to avoid?or delimit the effects of?climate change.

By short, climate?models predicts that?Earth's?global average temperate will rise in the?future, but the amount of warming depends on the decisions we make about fossil fuel and the use of land. This is really it.

However, decisions about how we make about fossil fuel and the use of land are already in our hands, we have sovereign control over both the prospect of climate development and improvements to the earth's climate in both the short and long term. It is the decision making that are critical.

To remedy we need to take advantage of natural climate solutions?- conservation, restoration and improved land management actions that increases carbon storage in the soil - and of course avoid or delimit greenhouse gas emissions in landscapes and wetlands across?the?globe, because these solutions is addressing both desertification, the recurrent droughts and food shortages.

All of these problems that creates the climate crisis is overturn-able by changing the way we produce our food, and take advantages of energy.

The prospect of future?changes are?expected?to include a warmer atmosphere, a warmer and more acidic ocean, higher sea levels, and larger fluctuations in the expected precipitation pattern. The critical extent of?future impact from climate change?depends on what we do now to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It is really a simple context, the more we emit, the larger?future?changes will be.

Water has shaped nature through all times and moved sediments around and changed landscapes, cut deep ravines and transported loose particles from the heights of the lowest areas.

It follows from the nature of the water that living conditions are created and developed with changes in the availability of water.?Water, like energy, air and soil, forms the basis for life on earth.

The problem with drought is exacerbated by human over-consumption of natural resources, inappropriate nature management: Deforestation and depletion of aquifers and rerouting of natural water currents.

Climate problems drain the narrow convection zone between the lower atmosphere and the upper asthenosphere, where biological and weather phenomenas else drives the water balance, and disrupt the fragile balance where the solid land else becomes naturally irrigated and fertile by natural processes.

Increased extent of loss of polar ice has an increasingly tilting impact on the climate?through the Atlantic Ocean water circulation system, that basically works like a central heating system moving energy around the oceans affecting both weather and climate.

Melt down of the arctic sea ice and inland ice caps, traps the currents ability to systematically imply an adequate cooling effect on the climate, and by a development built-up on a multi-decadal timescale, the effect from this is an up-amplification of climate changes which is almost inevitable unrelated to ongoing short-term efforts.

To make a strategic effort, then?everything?we do has to pass the climate test. You may have heard that there are just eight, or 10, or 12 years to?save?the world from the climate crisis. But calm down, there is no deadline after which the?planet?explodes, and no point at which action becomes pointless.?

There is though a certain time lag between what we do and when we feel it. Eg. in the absence of major action to?reduce?emissions,?global?temperature is on track to rise by 2.5°C to 4.5°C (4.5°F to 8°F) by 2100, according to estimates. But it is never?too late to avoid?or delimit the worst effects of?climate change.

You may have heard that global warming refers to the rise in?global?temperatures due mainly to the increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases?in the?atmosphere, and that climate change refers to the increasing?changes in the?measures of?climate?over a long period of time – including precipitation, temperature, and wind patterns.

Our knowledge about this specific contexts is overwhelming, and many different descriptions of the problem does not make it easier to eye out a clear solution amongst.

But the schism is pretty simple, climate?models predicts that?Earth's?global average temperate will rise in the?future, but the amount of warming depends on the decisions we make about fossil fuel and the use of land.

However, decisions about how we make about fossil fuel and the use of land are already in our hands, we have sovereign control over both the prospect of climate development and improvements to the earth's climate in both the short and long term.

To remedy we need to take advantage of natural climate solutions?- conservation, restoration and improved land management actions that increases carbon storage in the soil - and of course avoid or delimit greenhouse gas emissions in landscapes and wetlands across?the?globe, because these solutions is addressing both desertification, the recurrent droughts and food shortages.

Today humans affect ecosystems both directly and indirectly, and the effects varies from minimal to catastrophic. Through fossil fuel combustion, humans have disturbed the making of the breathable air, changed the quality of the soil and water and altered the types and distributions of plants and animals around the globe.

The extensive use of fertilizers in most places and slash-and-burn agriculture elsewhere is both the smoking gun - and the actual problem - as it forces the soil to chemically deplete and leaves the soil barren and turns the soil back into a rock.

So you see there is hope

Knowledge of astronomic cyclicality, seasonal and climate drivers and how natural instruments and tools play so well making land healthy and fertile again is key to protect and improve our climate.

- and you may realize that it's actually not so hard to fix.

It follows from the nature of the water that living conditions are created and developed with changes in the availability of water.?Water, like energy, air and soil, forms the basis for life on earth.

The problem with drought is exacerbated by human over-consumption of natural resources, inappropriate nature management: Deforestation and depletion of aquifers and rerouting of natural water currents.

The effect of climate changes is draining of the narrow convection zone between the lower atmosphere and the upper asthenosphere, where biological and weather phenomenas else drives the water balance, and disruption of the fragile balance where the solid land else becomes naturally irrigated and fertile by natural processes.

The melt down of the arctic sea ice and in land ice caps, traps the currents ability to achieve adequate cooling effect on the climate, by a development built-up on a multi-decadal timescale, the effect by this is an up-amplification of climate changes which is almost inevitable.

E.g. as the decline in sea ice cover that we are currently experiencing, is caused by weakening of the over-all large-scale?ocean circulation?of the North Atlantic, thus resulting in increased oceanic transport of heat from the equator to higher latitudes.

The North Atlantic Sea is then constantly submerged with an extra surplus of very cold fresh water - paralleled with undercooling of the bottom and serious changes in flora and fauna - as a result of biotopes is relating to certain temperature in the currents - as well as melting of surface ice in addition is hitting the nail in the inevitable climate changes.

Changes in the subpolar North Atlantic impact the AMOC, is happening ever so slowly over the course of multiple decades. These changes in the Arctic is the most critical change agent that alters the AMOCs ability to keep the climate cooled down, thus amplifying the climate changes.

As the ongoing Arctic ice loss thereby increasingly are infusing more cold waters it keeps a critical role in the collapse of one of the planet's largest water circulation systems: The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC).

It is indeed a vicious cycle, and it can only be broken in a long-term effort to regulate temperature and precipitation in an advantageous direction.

The constantly moving system of deep-water circulation by currents - also referred to as the Global Ocean Conveyor Belt - sends warm Gulf Stream salinal water to the North Atlantic thereby releasing heat to the atmosphere and warms Western Europe. The cooler fresh water on the other hand is sinking - you can say it submerges the warmer salinas current - into the depths of the ocean and travels all the way down to Antarctica, and eventually circulates back up to the Gulf Stream.

AMOC has a lower limb of dense, cold fresh water that flows south from the north Atlantic, and an upper limb of warm, salty water that flows north from the south Atlantic as part of the Gulf Stream. AMOC plays a major role in regional and global climate, affecting the Atlantic rim countries—particularly those in Europe—and far beyond.

As ocean circulation weakens, the transport of heat from low to high latitudes is reduced, one could theorize it should lead to sea ice growth. But it is a related mechanism by which sea ice actively affects AMOC on multi-decadal time scales through the impact on climate changes as everything is connected.

Sea ice loss though is the most critical (fast) reason among the mechanisms that contribute to AMOC collapse.

When it comes to (de)regulating global climate, the circulation of the Atlantic Ocean plays a key role to the currently multi-decadal climate changes.

This cybernetic system is running live by certain thresholds of temperatures in a time scale that exceeds geological era's. Energy infuse and ability to cool and warm the right places, circulating the fresh waters from the polar caps with ancient salinas waters by convection and evaporation is governing the very biosphere.

To dampen the development we need to get much more organized about how we rehabilitate the natural processes in the long run and adapt the use of resources, so that nature benefits from the intervention instead of getting deteriorated by the use.

Increased extent of polaris loss has a growing tilting impact on the climate through the Atlantic Ocean water circulation system, that basically works like a central heating system gone wreck, moving energy around the oceans affecting both weather and climate in the wrong direction.

These currents are certainly deemed system drivers that has a long term impact on the climate.

To break the devastating climate effect we need to take use of co-cyclic efforts to reduce the impact on both weather and climate, ie there is a need to launch both long-term and short-term initiatives to achieve that the trend can be reversed.

All of these problems that creates the climate crisis is overturned by changing the way we produce our food, and take advantages of energy.

You may have heard that there are just eight, or 10, or 12 years to?save?the world from the climate crisis. But calm down, there is no deadline after which the?planet?explodes, and no point at which action becomes pointless.

There is though a certain time lag between what we do and when we feel it. Eg. in the absence of major action to?reduce?emissions,?global?temperature is on track to rise by 2.5°C to 4.5°C (4.5°F to 8°F) by 2100, according to estimates.

You may also have heard that global warming refers to the rise in?global?temperatures due mainly to the increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases?in the?atmosphere, and that climate change refers to the increasing?changes in the?measures of?climate?over a long period of time – including precipitation, temperature, and wind patterns.

Our knowledge about this specific contexts is overwhelming, and many different descriptions of the problem does not make it easier to eye out a clear solution amongst.

But the schism is pretty simple, climate?models predicts that?Earth's?global average temperate will rise in the?future, but the amount of warming depends on the decisions we make about fossil fuel and the use of land.

Decisions about how we make about fossil fuel and the use of land are already in our hands, we have sovereign control over both the prospect of climate development and improvements to the earth's climate in both the short and long term.

To remedy we need to take advantage of natural climate solutions?- conservation, restoration and improved land management actions that increases carbon storage in the soil - and of course avoid or delimit greenhouse gas emissions in landscapes and wetlands across?the?globe, because these solutions is addressing both desertification, the recurrent droughts and food shortages.

Today humans affect ecosystems both directly and indirectly, and the effects varies from minimal to catastrophic. Through fossil fuel combustion, humans have disturbed the making of the breathable air, changed the quality of the soil and water and altered the types and distributions of plants and animals around the globe.

The extensive use of fertilizers in most places and slash-and-burn agriculture elsewhere is both the smoking gun - and the actual problem - as it forces the soil to chemically deplete and leaves the soil barren and turns the soil back into a rock.

Knowledge of astronomic cyclicality, seasonal and climate drivers and how natural instruments and tools play so well making land healthy and fertile again is key to protect and improve our climate.

Yes, there is hope

It is never?too late to avoid?or delimit the worst effects of?climate change.

#sustainability?#environment?#climatechange?#sustainabledevelopment