We Are All Product Managers Now

We Are All Product Managers Now

Ten years ago I tried to visualize the difference between a product manager and business analyst. That diagram had some overlap between the roles but left many things on either side of Venn diagram overlap. In the years since the popularity of the product owner role has skyrocketed (peaked perhaps?). On a recent call with a client (large, multi-national, legacy financial services) a debate arose between the distribution of responsibilities between, now, three roles – business analyst, product manager and product owner. Ten years ago I would have worked to separate specific work to specific individuals. Today, in 2024, we are all product managers now.?

Forcing a division reduces collaboration and shared understanding

I once worked with a company where the product manager role was an outward facing role. In other words, their responsibility was to interface with the customer and the market. They would do competitive analyses, speak to customers, run experiments and define the product vision and goals. The product owners in the same company faced inward. They were the liaison with the development team. This included the designers. The only insight into the “outside world” as it were for the product development team was the product owner. They defined specific requirements, wrote user stories, prioritized them in a backlog and managed the project plan. This company also had business analysts. Every feature had to be run past them to ensure it followed business rules, regulations and any other domain-specific constraints.?

The development team had information coming at them from 3 different directions. All of that information was filtered through a single point – the product owner – who inevitably editorialized it to fit their vision for success (hey, they’re only human). Once the team produced something the product owner would share it with the product manager, business analyst and eventually other stakeholders to see how it met their needs. The back and forth cycle was slow, prone to miscommunication and misunderstandings. It kept the teams from talking to each other and to the outside world because every one of these 3 roles kept access to “their” information and insight well guarded. Otherwise, what was the point of their job? My current client’s situation was identical.?

The biggest losers in this situation were the product development teams and ultimately the customers. The team never had a clear sense of why they were doing certain work or why direction had changed. Getting anything clarified took days and sometimes weeks – time that could have been spent refining the product and getting it to market. There was no shared conversation which meant no shared understanding. The system was broken because of roles defined to separate the work rather than bring it together.?

We are all product managers now

If you work in any capacity that seeks to understand the market, discover gaps and opportunities, define a product vision and lead the process of making that vision a reality in a compelling way to your customers, you are a product manager. The specific responsibilities will vary between companies and industries. Your level of technical expertise, domain knowledge and customer understanding will also fluctuate based on the specifics of your context. You will do work that was once covered by business analysts. You will undoubtedly do what product owners have been defined to do. And, despite its malleability and squishiness, you will also be doing product management work. We need a name for all of it. That name is product manager.

The more we divide the role the less successful the end result will be. We need a person building an inclusive, diverse discussion with everyone involved in the making of a product. We need to eliminate the territoriality of roles. We can’t divide our perspective into outward and inward-facing ones. And, most importantly, we can’t keep our teams away from the customer.

My guess is that those who currently carry the product manager title will nod along in agreement with this post. My other guess is that those of you holding product owner and business analyst titles will resist this idea and likely poke some reasonable, well-intentioned holes in my very short argument. I’m ready to hear it. Before you do that, though, please consider how your argument ultimately makes for a better customer experience and successful business. Ok? Let’s go.?

Predrag Rajkovi?

Product & Agile Coach-Mentor-Consultant

6 个月

I agree completely. However, would be interesting to touch upon the topic of how to have a product manager as described, who, yet, has enough time to perform this role in all of its aspects. In other words, if you are not making a division on the level of functions, you have to "simplify", divide, or "limit" the product that the PM is responsible for, so that they have time to do all that is needed.

Scott Varho

Helping those that invest in digital experiences get more from their investment(s). Helping those that build digital experiences get more from the journey.

6 个月

As you suggest, I find the boundaries to be somewhat artificial and yet also somewhat necessary. If your goal is to create impactful products and the work ebbs and flows, then having more fluidity in the tasks increases your probability of achieving that goal. If you want to optimize from individual ownership, well, that rigidity comes at a team-level cost and yet the clarity ensures details are managed (and let's be clear, there are an overwhelming number of details to manage). I'll go further than these roles. As a BA then PO then PM (and eventually head of product/ux/engineering)... I became less and less rigid and invited others to participate in tasks that they were traditionally excluded from (or saved from). Best example - writing user stories. Rather than think I was the only person that could/should write them, I invited others to create them at the end of a conversation clarifying the details. The best outcome from this was getting a feedback loop - e.g. if the engineer I was talking with updates the story and they mis-understood something, I get an opportunity to address it before they work it. This approach also gave us some flexibility around load AND shared ownership boosted collaboration and outcomes.

Georg S. Kuklick

??Award-Winning Design | No-code | Ai Automation | Design Systems since 2006 | ex-Accenture, ex-Unqork

6 个月

Is one single PM doing all the work then, or are tasks and responsibilities allocated to several PMs with different work areas?

Matthew Blackwell

Sr. Lead Product Manager: Acquisition

6 个月

I disagree here. Having a separation between tactical Product Owners and strategic Product Managers enables more time to focus on the future of a product and ensure alignment when there are many scrum teams contributing to a single product. Yes, Product Owners get directly in front of clients to dial in on the specifics of implementing a new feature so they shouldn't be inward facing. However, this also requires Product Managers to give up control over the specifics of how a solution is implemented. They should have an opportunity to validate that the solution is aligned to the Problem to be solved, but need to give the PO along with the rest of their Delivery team the space to drive their own solutions. As someone who has done a combined and separated roles, there's no way I could find the time to look 1-3 years out on discovery while keeping engineering teams fed. It's a different mindset and skillset. Business Analysts don't make sense in an agile world. Making business cases is a task for the PM.

Melissa Barrass

UX/UI Designer

6 个月

David Corrigan May be of interest or pain to you ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jeff Gothelf的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了