Are we adequately prepared for the workforce by Universities??
"Education is the key to success" is a daily statement we use to motivate students and people we want to aspire to greatness. We have all heard those words at some point in our academic journey. Whether at a graduation party speech, a keynote speaker, or a motivational speaker, they tend to find different ways to say it. In my part of the world, it is believed that the higher you go (academic-wise), the better your chances are. Society even provides a false impression about the likelihood of prosperity for a candidate whose degree is attained outside their home country's borders. It does not surprise me any longer when most young people I speak to strive to save funds or ask a family member for financial support to flee the shores of Liberia to attain education abroad. I guess the intention is to better their chance at prosperity (job hunting) or to be viewed as intellectually superior to their comrades with a local degree back home.
People have differing objectives on why they want to attain secondary or tertiary education, and are uncountable. I still tend to believe that in my part of the world, some of the objectives would involve preparing students for the workforce, getting to meet and network with future potential leaders, improving analytical and critical thinking skills, increasing one's earning potential, and helping them stand out from other candidates looking for the same role. For these reasons, people make investment decisions amidst a difficult economic situation in higher education, expecting a solid return on investment.?
For this write-up, my focus is on preparing students for the workforce and if students are getting a positive return on investment. Are we getting our money's worth from the academic programs? Have these degrees/academic programs fully prepared us enough for the workforce? The fancy degrees and the networks will get us in the door, but it's crucial to understand that staying within the workforce requires critical attributes and skillsets. The Gen Z (Gen Z, 1997-2013 or 1995 to 2010 age group ) generation is the youngest in the workforce, forming the vast majority of new entrants. Let's critically evaluate our academic programs' effectiveness and return on investment in this context. The urgency of this issue cannot be overstated.?
A recent poll by education and career advisory platform Intelligent , seeking insight from 1,000 business owners and executives about their views of Gen Z workers, showed that six in 10 employers say they have already sacked some of the Gen Z workers they hired fresh out of college earlier this year. More than half, 53%, feel that Gen Z college graduates are unprepared for the workforce and believe they lack vital skills to stay in the workplace. The most frequently cited reasons for why these new Gen Z hires didn’t work out or looked unprepared were a lack of motivation or initiative (50%), poor communication skills (39%), and a lack of professionalism (46%). Other factors included struggles with feedback (38%) and inadequate problem-solving abilities (34%).
领英推荐
According to the report, Hiring managers are inclined to retain or hire new entrants (within the Gen Z age group) who show initiative at work, exhibit a positive attitude, demonstrate a strong work ethic, are open to feedback/criticism, are adaptable, and are punctual and reliable. Picking these attributes was surprising as the hiring managers had options like solid technical skills, internship experience, work experience, and avoiding office politics among the possibilities afforded.?
Our educational approach in Liberia needs to focus on the right things to prepare students for the workforce. Don’t get me wrong; I am not against traditional teaching methods and curriculum. One must know the alphabet, string letters together, pronounce, and then speak. My qualm lies in where our emphasis lies. If the end game is improving one’s communication skills, then let us embed learning tactics that will do that. We need to focus on what is relevant in today’s world. Emails are used in everyday workday conversations. How many of our programs are teaching email etiquette and workplace conversations? We are still coping with lessons on block-style letter writing (Relevance, please). Who cares? Just be clear with the message. Some tactics students must deploy are copying and pasting, chewing and pouring, and writing it just as you are given by the teacher (not even paraphrasing or summarizing). Still, they are not sustainable or applicable in today’s workforce. So, what is the point of sharing irrelevant information and tactics? Our educational approach/system should be able to answer these questions. It's time for a change.
There are a lot of what-ifs, and we can list them above. The current education system isn’t adequately preparing students for the new workplace environment. The system needs to be revamped to address the required skills to excel in the workplace. The Ministry of Education and significant educational and labor stakeholders should research to understand the needs of the modern-day workforce and tailor their teaching approach and curriculum to the findings. It would be wonderful not just to enter the workforce and be kicked out, but to sustain employment to retain a return on investment in higher education.
Logistics Management Advisor- Global Health Supply Chain -Procurement and Supply Management (GHSC PSM-USAID Project)
1 个月Very informative, I do agreed Ron, during our study we took several hours, reviewed our lesson, even, put our mind and soul in each topic that was read and apply our common sense what was been deliberated, and make one own judgement, but now a day it is different ball game
Registered Midwife at Liberia Midwives Association
1 个月This is true and we need to act now.
MA, BSc, Policy Analyst, Manager, and Development Consultant, Communicator
1 个月Very informative
IT Consultant
1 个月You are right that understanding leads to success. It is unfortunate that the universities are flooded with high school graduates that are already ill-prepared with unfirm foundation. I don’t believe that our society subscribes to meritocracy as ‘it is believed’ whatever-wise. The pseudo-perception that foreign credential triumphs local education is not all delusive as this was the situation post-civil where principals, teachers and professors were mainly foreigners. Many Liberians became victors or victims by either having a degree from outside the country or by having a locally acquired degree. Our history speaks much to this phenomenon regarding the classes of settlers and classes of natives. What has happened over time is that the line has been blurred due to factors like inter-marriages, nepotism, favoritism, and cronyism. My non-Linerian tiertiary study had a lot to do with my free-thinking nature in grade school. Many teachers are lazy, so chewing and pouring was often required, and I failed because I was strong-willed towards understanding and delivering. Now that I am able to think outside the box, I see this phenomenon as a man who lost his key in a dark room, but goes outside under a street light in hope to find it.
Former Associate Field Manager at GiveDirectly
1 个月Great piece and I am sure we can do this when those in charge can give a listening ears and take the necessary action. It has to be now.