WAR ON COPS California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.
The proposed legislation would change the guidance in California’s use of force laws so that police may open fire ”‘only when necessary’ rather than ‘when reasonable,’” Sacramento-based Assemblyman Kevin McCarty (D), said at a press conference Tuesday.
He co-authored the bill with fellow Democrat Assemblywoman Shirley Weber with support from the American Civil Liberties Union and fellow members of the California Legislative Black Caucus. They were joined at Tuesday’s press conference with Sacramento leaders from the NAACP and the Black Lives Matter movement, along with the grandfather of 22-year-old Stephon Clark, last month’s shooting victim.
“We should no longer be the target practice of a ‘shoot first, ask questions later’ police force,” Assemblyman Christopher Holden (D) said, before listing the names of several other unarmed black victims of police shootings.
The legislation is aimed at tackling the reality, as seen in studies, that police kill unarmed black men at disproportionate rates compared to unarmed white men. Supporters of the bill hope raising the standard for when lethal force is permitted will encourage officers to make de-escalation their first line of defense.
The current standard comes from an “over-100-year-old law that too often justifies deadly force incidents,” McCarty said.
In the weeks since Clark’s death, McCarty’s district has been stormed by protestors furious about the emerging details surrounding the shooting. Upward of 300 demonstrators gathered in Sacramento last Friday after an autopsy revealed the young father was shot at least seven times in the back in his own backyard.
“It’s clear that the current law protects the police, not the people,” ACLU legislative advocate Lizzie Buchen said at Tuesday’s announcement as activists recounted similar shooting incidents involving police.
Weber is confident the state can pave the way on this issue.
“If California can’t do it,” she asked, “who can?”
from the the Dale Yeager Blog
Currently doing great things and blessed to do so
6 年It’s sad we can’t back those who have taken the oath to protect us. I just hope the committee has the wherewithal to really understand/ take the time to discover what the problem at hand truly is. Just doing a quick root cause analysis in my head I can tell you it’s not switching the word reasonable to necessary just so someone with their own beliefs can play God with public servants life. I would encourage the authors of this bill and all committee members who will consider this bill to go on a ride-along with at least one police department before even starting the process of considering it. Every person that wants to support this bill for that matter should. It will be eye opening and just might find that restricting our police departments further may not be the right answer, or reaffirm that it is. I’m sure most will or already have if the intention of ensuring the best protection / service to our communities is what’s trying to be achieved. .
experienced manufacturer
6 年And this is the beginning of the end. The average engagement is starts and stops in less than a second, and the average law enforcement time from holster to shot fired is 1.28 seconds. So if you do the math then every police officer will die!! Good job CA!