WANTED!!! PRESIDENT PUTIN

Today, 17 March 2023, the International Criminal Court in the Hague issued an arrest order for the Russian President Vladimir Putin and his children’s right commissioner Maria Lvova-Belova for unlawful deportation of Ukrainian children.

How viral is this order and who has the authority to execute it? It is like the Supreme Court to strip Biden from power, when all the force structures of the country are in the hands of the President.

The Court of the Hague has no jurisdiction to enter sovereign country to arrest someone, but the history of the American Jurisprudence shows that the USA has entered many countries to arrest foreigners and have prosecuted them even without jurisdiction. It is a common practice in the Federal Courts in the USA, and the jail is full with foreigners, dragged from any part of the world, or arrested in the USA upon their arrival in the country. The same have done Israelis by kidnapping a person and prosecuting him in Israel, like the Nazi Adolf Eichmann, who was a German official of the Nazi Party, an officer of the Schutzstaffel (SS), and one of the major organizers of the Holocaust, who was kidnapped in Argentina to be executed, hanged in Israel, Jerusalem in 1962.

Mostly the orders for international criminals from other countries have been not arrests, but direct execution, assassination, and during the Cold War, Carlos the Jackal, concluded long list assassinations, on behalf of many governments.

?

The Hague Court issued an order for the Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milo?evi? in 1999 for crimes committed in Kosovo. The International Criminal Court has no armed forces to enter Yugoslavia, but the President, then Milo?evi?, couldn’t leave the country. Yugoslavia was then in state of war. And Milo?evi? commanded both the army and the police, and nobody could execute the warrant.?

When announced the indictment, Prosecutor Arbour called on all the accused with Milo?evi? to surrender voluntarily, and in the event that they did not, for the Minister of Justice to provide for their arrest and transfer. Of course, that couldn’t be done at that time. The Tribunal served arrest warrants against him and his co-accused on every UN Member State, together with orders to search for and freeze all of their assets, so that they could not use them to evade justice.

None of the accused surrendered or were arrested. But a change in the political scene following the September 2000 presidential elections and mass street protests in October 2000 led to Milo?evi?’s ouster from power. Soon after, in December 2000, the opposition leader Zoran Djindji? became Serbia’s new Prime Minister. In January 2001, the new Serbian authorities placed Milo?evi? under round-the-clock police surveillance in Belgrade, and began investigating allegations that he had misused state funds and abused his office. They later imprisoned him and charged him with misappropriation of state funds and abuse of power.

Throughout this time the Tribunal urged the new authorities in Belgrade to transfer Milo?evi? into its custody to stand trial. The Court President and the Prosecutor insisted that the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia had an international obligation to transfer Milo?evi? to The Hague. Supporting the Tribunal and the rule of law, the United States made US government aid to Yugoslavia conditional on Milo?evi?’s handover to the ICTY.

In 2001, Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Djindji? authorised Milo?evi?’s transfer to The Hague, under the pressure from the USA.

What we see in the structure of power worldwide. If the UN and the International Criminal Court are dependent on the pressure from the USA mainly, then the rest of the countries, who has no majority in the voting, but majority in the world population, has to establish their own Tribunal to issue arrest orders for the Americans and other political leaders, their allies. Because there will be no one to issue orders and execute them for the American leaders if they are in charge of the institutions. And the justice can’t be carried appropriately, because national bias will act in every decision-making. That is the biggest trouble of the justice system internationally and nationally in every country, that there is no one universal criteria and one universal body, who could be independent in any environment and under any conditions. So justice is blind literally, because is closing the eyes when it feels convenient.

We have in the USA also the Magnitski act from 2016, when ??the Congress enacted the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, which allows the U.S. government to sanction foreign government officials implicated in human rights abuses anywhere in the world.

The opposing act was used in Russia against the American officials, including sanctions prohibiting them from entering Russia.

Direct response to the adoption of the Magnitsky Act, the Russian government denied Americans adoption of Russian children, and posthumously convicted Magnitsky as guilty.

Still now Russia has no arrest orders about any other countries officials, and maybe has to think about that option in case they capture Kiev and establish Russian authority, that can arrest anyone who enters Ukraine, or has committed any crime on the Ukrainian territory. And even to capture other countries’ officials when they visit international events in other friendly counties.

Now FBI is doing its business in many countries in Europe, and even president Biden asked the President of Ukraine to fire its Chief prosecutor, who was trying to investigate President Biden dirty deals, conditioning the aid coming to Ukraine from the USA with his removal.

Recently the USA started to threaten anyone with arrest orders, even highly positioned officials in many countries, and at the same time stopped investigations on very corrupt and unscrupulous criminal officials, that are friendly to the USA. Mexico's former public security secretary,?Genaro García Luna, recently has been found guilty of drug trafficking in the USA?and also, El Chapo, the drug lord from Mexico, who was working closely with the ex Mexican President. Similar fate threaten every fallen leader of any country who is not willing to follow the rules of the big American brother.

The fact that USA is locating FBI sections in many countries is like policing in these countries and also spying in these countries in opposition of any anti spy legislations of these countries, but the double standard is a common practice in the current world order.

Recently I wrote about an Ukrainian girl, who was convicted in the USA of exporting Ukrainian kids. The Court convicted her without any jurisdiction, because the crime was committed in another country from foreign citizens. She has been invited to the USA by FBI to testify against the person, a Turkish citizen, who threatened her and her kid to help him in his business with kids, and abused her and raped her all the time, and used her as sex slave. Appeared that the business with Ukrainian kids is much more organized and mafia controlled, because instead to use her as witness, the authorities in the USA sentenced her for many years, and nevertheless of the petitions from the Ukrainian government and her lawyers, the Department of State refuses to release her, or to transfer her to her native country, as is the usual practice with foreigners. On my opinion, the story with the Ukrainian kids will unravel further under different jurisdictions, and now the Court in Hague took a stand under again, the USA pressure.

What will be the response of the Russian President Putin under his arrest order?