Walmart, Amazon Prime and How to Win Customer Loyalty

Walmart, Amazon Prime and How to Win Customer Loyalty

Recently, Walmart announced that it was scrapping its two-year old $49/year shipping membership known as ShippingPass. With a ShippingPass membership, Walmart customers could get two-day shipping on millions of product that Walmart sells. In its place, Walmart is now offering free two-day shipping to all customers with purchase orders of $35 or more. When announcing the launch of this new service, new Walmart ecommerce CEO Marc Lore (formerly CEO of Walmart-acquired of Jet.com) gave a rather interesting explanation:

We are hoping to build loyalty on the fact that you are able to get free two-day shipping…without a membership. This day and age, two-day shipping is just table stakes.”

This explanation is interesting for a number of reasons, most importantly that Walmart is facing intense pressure from Amazon’s ecommerce and distribution prowess. This pressure can be best summed up as, “Can Amazon get to a level of convenience and selection that makes Walmart’s physical stores and proximity a nonfactor at best and a liability at worst?” While Walmart has flirted with same day delivery in the past, leveraging partnerships with Uber and Lyft, Amazon is making 2-hour and even 1-hour delivery an everyday experience and expectation in select cities with Amazon Prime Now. Not to mention Prime Now offers a staggering selection of 50 million items to Walmart’s two million.

Table Stakes Do Not Make A Strategy

In light of Amazon’s continued development of the Prime Service and its growing user base (now at an estimated 66 million users), Lore’s explanation of the new Walmart loyalty strategy doesn’t add up. Calling free two-day shipping “table stakes” and then creating an entire strategy around it doesn’t make much sense. If consumers consider a feature or service table stakes for doing business, they perceive it as a right and an expectation. It’s not a wedge to build a business or lasting customer relationship.

Loyalty programs work on the basis of additional benefits to the customer relationship beyond the cost of doing business that are later realized. To counter, you might say, “But, I’m saving a $99/year going with Walmart." That’s an expected outcome for the trade-off of not using Prime services. This is where the folks at Walmart are making a strategic mistake assessing Amazon Prime’s value proposition around customer loyalty. The value of Prime services compound on each other, from 2-day shipping to 1/2 hour delivery to Prime video (and accompanying Amazon Channels for premium cable) to Amazon Music and a host of other services. The combination of these services provide additional benefits to customers beyond two-day shipping, that are realized later.

A great customer loyalty program is meant to create massive lock-in (due to additional value) that customers voluntarily opt-in to.

Free Doesn’t Equal Loyalty

Walmart is free to create a loyalty program based on free two-day shipping, just don’t expect it to create much loyalty, given the lack of additional benefits and value. One of the most common mistakes that I see in technology companies, especially early-stage startups, is the insistence on giving away products/service for free as way to grow demand and loyalty. Contrary to popular belief, consumers are more than happy to pay for services that enrich their lives and help them accomplish their goals. Consumers will also recognize a sucker’s bet and take a free product if offered.

Competing on price is only a viable strategy when you have a competitive cost advantage over the competition in another service that is highly-valued.That has been Amazon’s playbook with Amazon ecommmerce, Amazon Prime and now Amazon Web Services. Walmart saw the playbook, but learned the wrong lessons. Here’s a tip for Walmart folks trying to make serious go at Amazon: focus on providing a differentiated and highly valuable mobile commerce experience for consumer demographics that Amazon hasn’t penetrated. That would be folks at the the low end (overserved by current offerings), who have an internet access via smartphones (typically Android), but not PC. These folks are already more likely to shop at Walmart over Target given their proximity to Walmart stores. Walmart would be better served focusing on these consumers and building loyalty amongst them with great services.



Thanks for reading! If you’re interesting in learning more about Coin Labs consulting and advisory services, connect with me on LinkedIn or email us at [email protected].

Shelly George (Gregory)

Operations & Strategy Leader | Ex-Meta, LinkedIn

8 年

I would add that excellent customer support is worth paying for, too! Speaking from experience, I have worked with both Walmart and Amazon customer support and Amazon is truly stellar, which has definitely influenced my loyalty to Amazon. Great article!

Kurt Feldner

Advocate For Gold Standard Service

8 年

Targeting the group you mentioned at the end of your article sounds like a great idea, Donald. As for Walmart learning the wrong lesson, maybe it depends on what the subject is. If you're making an argument that Amazon offers more (music, video, etc) and for that reason Walmart's service of free 2-day delivery would mean nothing, I would challenge that point. Just because Amazon provides a larger list of benefits doesn't necessarily mean it takes away from the value of what Walmart is offering. Not all Amazon Prime members care about the music & video "and a host of other services." Instead, they shop with Amazon Prime because of the relationship & familiarity, free shipping & it's well-known customer service. But with Amazon, you can't hop in your car, run to its corporate headquarters or any of their warehouse locations and hold the product in your hand first before you buy. That's the value & advantage Walmart has over Amazon, not to mention the customer doesn't have to pay the $99/year membership fee for Amazon Prime to get free shipping.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Donald Richard的更多文章

  • Trust, Liquidity and Peer-to-Peer Marketplaces

    Trust, Liquidity and Peer-to-Peer Marketplaces

    Trust is both a measurement and multiplier for liquidity “I met the buyer/seller from Craigslist/Facebook…

  • Product Management, Distribution and Other Things You Learn While Building Great Products

    Product Management, Distribution and Other Things You Learn While Building Great Products

    Here’s a non-exhaustive list of lessons I’ve learned since becoming a product manager focused on customer products…

  • Food Delivery, Grocery Delivery and Winnable Markets

    Food Delivery, Grocery Delivery and Winnable Markets

    Owning demand is the most important goal for a marketplace. If a company owns demand, it.

    1 条评论
  • Publishing, Subscriptions and Share of Wallet

    Publishing, Subscriptions and Share of Wallet

    Ev Williams, founder of Medium and Twitter, wrote an interesting piece on Medium.com titled The Rationalization of…

  • Thoughts on Access vs. Ownership

    Thoughts on Access vs. Ownership

    I’ve been thinking more and more about the American middle and lower classes, why they’re struggling and may…

  • Bitcoin, Debt Relief and Bubbles

    Bitcoin, Debt Relief and Bubbles

    I spent the last five days in southwest Virginia/Northeast Tennessee, an area that many affectionately call “coal…

  • Commerce Case Studies: Facebook and Food Delivery

    Commerce Case Studies: Facebook and Food Delivery

    Facebook recently announced that it would be allowing its users to order food delivery directly from its service: You…

    7 条评论
  • What's Your Y?

    What's Your Y?

    It might be because my employer is a major Telco, but I think a lot of about networks, network effects and why they are…

  • Apple's Business Chat Opportunity

    Apple's Business Chat Opportunity

    On June 9th, Apple will unveil “Business Chat for iOS”, a new feature that will allow businesses connect with iOs users…

    1 条评论
  • The Attention Tax

    The Attention Tax

    On a recent Recode Decode podcast, David Marcus, Facebook’s Head of Messenger, stated what should be an obvious…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了