Voyager's Fall: A Closer Look at the Cryptocurrency Firm's Financials and the Role of FTX and Binance
Welcome to the first edition of "In the Minds of Our Analysts."
At System2, we foster a culture of encouraging our team to express their thoughts, investigate, pen down, and share their perspectives on various topics. This series provides a space for our analysts to expose their insights.
All opinions expressed by System2 employees and their guests are solely their own and do not reflect the opinions of System2. This post is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. Clients of System2 may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this post.
Today’s post was written by Aquiba Benarroch.
Voyager, a Canadian public crypto-asset broker, is crypto's most sought-after acquisition target. Two major players, FTX and Binance, made bids for the company worth $1.4B and $1.0B, respectively despite its market capitalization of just $7M and a history of billions of lost customer funds, sour loans, and no profits. These bids raise questions about the reasons behind such high valuations and offers. Below, I analyze Voyager's financials and shed light on the events that led to its downfall and the potential implications of FTX and Binance's bids.
Voyager might hold the keys to the crypto kingdom. Both FTX and Binance bid $1.4B and $1.0B, respectively, for Voyager, a company with:
It makes no sense!
FTX and Binance's offers for Voyager were unjustified by the market or fundamentals and assumed most customer funds are lost and won’t be repaid. Below are the most common ways to justify the value of an acquisition:
? Market capitalization. Voyager’s stock is currently valued at ~$7M.
? Profitability. Voyager is far from being (or expected to be) a profitable business.
? Assets exceed liabilities. Customer funds massively exceed Voyager assets.
??Assets exceed liabilities because most customer funds won’t be repaid.
Based on my analysis, it’s possible that Voyager played an important role in the misappropriation of billions of customer funds by FTX (and Binance?)
Most crypto firms are private and opaque (FTX, Binance, Celsius, BlockFi, etc.). However, Voyager is a Canadian public company with quarterly financials. Let’s analyze Voyager's filings for answers.
Caveats:
Let’s do a quick overview of the company.
Voyager operated a crypto asset brokerage business. Customers deposited funds and traded them via Voyager’s trading partners, primarily in the US (FTX?) and in Cayman Islands (Binance?)
领英推荐
Closing thoughts:
If Voyager only owes $300M in customer funds but holds +$1B assets in crypto and fiat, why is Voyager bankrupt?
I think that most customer funds originated from FTX/Binance and were lost with risky bets. By acquiring Voyager at this valuation, FTX (before) and Binance (now) would come full circle and cover the balance sheet hole left by the missing funds. In addition, the scheme stays under wraps, and no other competitor can access the trades or uncover any wrongdoing related to Voyager.